Topography and Coating of Platinum Improve the Electrochemical Properties and Neuronal Guidance
Source abstract
Abstract
To improve neuronal-electrode interfaces, we analyzed the influence of surface topographies combined with coating on the electrochemistry of platinum and neuronal differentiation of PC-12 cells. Surface structuring on nanoscale was realized by femtosecond laser ablation. Additional coating with laminin (LA), collagen type I (COL) or poly-d-lysine (PDL) did not change the produced topography. We further demonstrated that impedance could be improved in all cases. The pre-requisites of differentiation - viability and attachment - were fulfilled on the topography. Cell attachment of non-differentiated and differentiated cells and their formation of focal adhesion complexes were even enhanced compared to unstructured platinum. However, without the nerve growth factor (NGF) no cellular outgrowth and differentiation were possible. The topography enabled cell elongation and reduced the amount of rounded cells, but less effective than coating. Differentiation was either comparable or increased on the structures when compared with unstructured coatings. For instance, microtubule associated protein (MAP2) was detected most on the topography alone. But a combination of surface structuring and coating had the strongest impact on differentiation: the usage of COL provoked best cell elongation and beta III tubulin expression, PDL best synaptophysin. LA-coating had no noteworthy effect. These findings point out that innovative electronic devices like cochlear implants include two aspects: (a) nanotopography to improve the transmission of electrical signals and neuronal attachment; and (b) an additional coating to stimulate neuronal differentiation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Conducting polymers and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laser Zentrum Hannover e.V., Hollerithallee 8, 30419 Hannover, Germany
Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Gosselin B. · Sensors · 2009 · 11 · 457210.3390/s110504572 ↗
2. Eusebio A. · J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. · 2011 · 82 · 86910.1136/jnnp.2010.217489 ↗
3. Reich U. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. · 2008 · 87 · 14610.1002/jbm.b.31084 ↗
4. Rose T. L. · IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. · 1990 · 199037 · 1119
5. Weiland J. D. · IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. · 2002 · 49 · 157410.1109/TBME.2002.805487 ↗
6. Cogan S. F. · Mater. Res. Soc. Meet. Boston · 2007 · 26
7. Bieberich E. · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2004 · 19 · 92310.1016/j.bios.2003.08.016 ↗
8. Cecchini M. · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 50510310.1088/0957-4484/18/50/505103 ↗
9. Flemming R. G. · Biomaterials · 1999 · 20 · 57310.1016/S0142-9612(98)00209-9 ↗
10. Lim J. Y. · Tissue Eng. · 2007 · 13 · 187910.1089/ten.2006.0154 ↗
11. Liu H. · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 35410.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.049 ↗
12. Schlie S. · 2010
13. Bettinger C. J. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 540610.1002/anie.200805179 ↗
14. Dellatore S. M. · Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. · 2008 · 19 · 53410.1016/j.copbio.2008.07.010 ↗
15. McNamara L. E. · Tissue Eng. · 2010 · 120623 (13pp)
16. Peng R. · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 600810.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.010 ↗
17. Cyster L. A. · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 9710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00480-0 ↗
18. Papadopoulou E. L. · Tissue Eng., Part C · 2010 · 16 · 49710.1089/ten.tec.2009.0216 ↗
19. Fadeeva E. · J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 24 · 1310.1163/016942410X508000 ↗
20. Schlie S. · J. Biomater. Appl. · 2010 · 25 · 21710.1177/0885328209345553 ↗
21. Keshmirian J. · J. Neurocytol. · 1989 · 18 · 49110.1007/BF01474545 ↗
22. Klesse L. J. · Oncogene · 1999 · 18 · 205510.1038/sj.onc.1202524 ↗
23. Hans A. · J. Biol. Chem. · 2001 · 276 · 725810.1074/jbc.M005107200 ↗
24. Wheeler T. C. · J. Biol. Chem. · 2002 · 277 · 1027310.1074/jbc.M107857200 ↗
25. 10.1089/ten.tec.2011.063510.1089/ten.tec.2011.0635 ↗
26. Geddes L. A. · Ann. Biomed. Eng. · 2003 · 31 · 87910.1114/1.1581292 ↗
27. Cogan S. F. · Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. · 2008 · 10 · 27510.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160518 ↗
28. Kovacs, G. T. A.InEnabling Technologies for Cultured Neural Networks;Stenger, D. A.; McKenna, T. M., Eds.Academic Press:New York, 1994; pp121–165.
29. Stieglitz, T.InNeuroprosthetics: Theory and Practice;Horch, K. W.; Dhillon, G., Eds.Series on Bioengineering & Biomedical Engineering;World Scientific:Singapore, 2004; Vol.2, pp475–516.
30. Vorobyev A. · 2007
31. Fadeeva, E.; Schlie, S.; Koch, J.; Chichkov, B. N.; Vorobyev, A. Y.; Guo, C.InContact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion;Mittal, K. L., Ed.Brill:Leiden, The Netherlands, 2009; Vol.6, pp163–171.
32. Ferrari A. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 50510.1021/nl103349s ↗
33. Lamoureux P. · J. Cell Biol. · 1990 · 110 · 7110.1083/jcb.110.1.71 ↗
34. Achyuta A. K. H. · Biotechnol. Prog. · 2009 · 25 · 22710.1002/btpr.58 ↗
35. Heiduschka P. · Electrochim Acta · 2001 · 47 · 29910.1016/S0013-4686(01)00573-4 ↗
36. Schwarz M. A. · Cell Growth Diff. · 1990 · 1 · 313