journal article·2022-06-01

Energy Harvesting by Mesoporous Reduced Graphene Oxide Enhanced the Mediator-Free Glucose-Powered Enzymatic Biofuel Cell for Biomedical Applications

Md Humayun Kabir, Erik Marquez, Grace Djokoto, Maurice Parker, Talia Weinstein, William Ghann, Jamal Uddin, Meser M. Ali, Maksudul M. Alam, Max Thompson, Altug S. Poyraz, Huggins Z. Msimanga, Mohammed M. Rahman, Michael Rulison, John Cramer

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

Harnessing electrochemical energy in an engineered electrical circuit from biochemical substrates in the human body using biofuel cells is gaining increasing research attention in the current decade due to the wide range of biomedical possibilities it creates for electronic devices. In this report, we describe and characterize the construction of just such an enzymatic biofuel cell (EBFC). It is simple, mediator-free, and glucose-powered, employing only biocompatible materials. A novel feature is the two-dimensional mesoporous thermally reduced graphene oxide (rGO) host electrode. An additionally novelty is that we explored the potential of using biocompatible, low-cost filter paper (FP) instead of carbon paper, a conductive polymer, or gold as support for the host electrode. Using glucose (C6H12O6) and molecular oxygen (O2) as the power-generating fuel, the cell consists of a pair of bioelectrodes incorporating immobilized enzymes, the bioanode modified by rGO–glucose oxidase (GOx/rGO), and the biocathode modified by rGO–laccase (Lac/rGO). Scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX), transmission electron microscopy, and Raman spectroscopy techniques have been employed to investigate the surface morphology, defects, and chemical structure of rGO, GOx/rGO, and Lac/rGO. N2 sorption, SEM/EDX, and powder X-ray diffraction revealed a high Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area (179 m2 g–1) mesoporous rGO structure with the high C/O ratio of 80:1 as well. Results from the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, UV–visible spectroscopy, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies indicated that GOx remained in its native biochemical functional form upon being embedded onto the rGO matrix. Cyclic voltammetry studies showed that the presence of mesoporous rGO greatly enhanced the direct electrochemistry and electrocatalytic properties of the GOx/rGO and Lac/rGO nanocomposites. The electron transfer rate constant between GOx and rGO was estimated to be 2.14 s–1. The fabricated EBFC (GOx/rGO/FP-Lac/rGO/FP) using a single GOx/rGO/FP bioanode and a single Lac/rGO/FP biocathode provides a maximum power density (Pmax) of 4.0 nW cm–2 with an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.04 V and remains stable for more than 15 days with a power output of ∼9.0 nW cm–2 at a pH of 7.4 under ambient conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Occupational Health Science, University of North Alabama, Florence, Alabama 35632, United States

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia 30144, United States

Department of Chemistry, Oglethorpe University, Atlanta, Georgia 30319, United States

Center for Nanotechnology, Department of Natural Sciences, Coppin State University, Baltimore, Maryland 21216, United States

Department of Neurosurgery, Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States

InnoSense LLC, Torrance, California 90505, United States

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Department of Physics, Oglethorpe University, Atlanta, Georgia 30319, United States

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy · National Institutes of Health · Oglethorpe University

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr020719k10.1021/cr020719k ↗
2. 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.09.02110.1016/j.elecom.2013.09.021 ↗
3. 10.1002/elan.20120034910.1002/elan.201200349 ↗
4. 10.1039/C3CP54888K10.1039/C3CP54888K ↗
5. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.05210.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.052 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22684410.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226844 ↗
7. 10.1016/0926-6577(64)90192-510.1016/0926-6577(64)90192-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.13310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.133 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0011510.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00115 ↗
10. 10.1039/b617650j10.1039/b617650j ↗
11. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.06.04810.1016/j.bios.2008.06.048 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.13310.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.133 ↗
13. 10.1021/cs200523s10.1021/cs200523s ↗
14. 10.1021/am507801x10.1021/am507801x ↗
15. 10.3390/s2012351710.3390/s20123517 ↗
16. 10.1021/ja029510e10.1021/ja029510e ↗
17. 10.1088/0957-4484/13/5/30310.1088/0957-4484/13/5/303 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20060002810.1002/adma.200600028 ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms136510.1038/ncomms1365 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.07110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.071 ↗
21. 10.1021/am405432b10.1021/am405432b ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b0294910.1021/acs.analchem.5b02949 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bios.2009.12.01210.1016/j.bios.2009.12.012 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-017-12417-010.1038/s41598-017-12417-0 ↗
25. 10.1021/ja207123710.1021/ja2071237 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12257-009-3034-z10.1007/s12257-009-3034-z ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.13610.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.136 ↗
28. 10.1039/c5ra25895b10.1039/c5ra25895b ↗
29. 10.2494/photopolymer.28.35710.2494/photopolymer.28.357 ↗
30. 10.3390/chemengineering301000710.3390/chemengineering3010007 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.11.01010.1016/j.apmt.2017.11.010 ↗
32. 10.1039/B917103G10.1039/B917103G ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.9b1777710.1021/acsami.9b17777 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.02310.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.023 ↗
35. 10.1039/c5ta01432h10.1039/c5ta01432h ↗
36. 10.1038/srep3012810.1038/srep30128 ↗
37. 10.1038/nchem.28110.1038/nchem.281 ↗
38. 10.3390/bios901001810.3390/bios9010018 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20120168010.1002/adma.201201680 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.11.10510.1016/j.snb.2013.11.105 ↗
41. 10.1038/nnano.2013.4610.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
42. Rao C. N. R. · 2013
43. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0043810.1021/acsnano.5b00438 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp905690a10.1021/jp905690a ↗
45. 10.1039/c6ra26636c10.1039/c6ra26636c ↗
46. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e0397210.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03972 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.09.04610.1016/j.snb.2013.09.046 ↗
48. 10.3390/ma810536310.3390/ma8105363 ↗
49. 10.1002/chem.20130038710.1002/chem.201300387 ↗
50. 10.1021/cm060258+10.1021/cm060258+ ↗
51. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.01010.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010 ↗
52. 10.1039/c2cs35026b10.1039/c2cs35026b ↗
53. 10.1021/ac501289x10.1021/ac501289x ↗
54. 10.1039/c4cp00452c10.1039/c4cp00452c ↗
55. 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.10.01610.1016/j.elecom.2014.10.016 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b0001210.1021/acs.analchem.5b00012 ↗
57. 10.1021/ac403250w10.1021/ac403250w ↗
58. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.03.14710.1016/j.snb.2016.03.147 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsami.9b0488410.1021/acsami.9b04884 ↗
60. 10.1021/ac302803610.1021/ac3028036 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.10.01610.1016/j.elecom.2014.10.016 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.06.02110.1016/j.jelechem.2017.06.021 ↗
63. 10.3390/app1023841910.3390/app10238419 ↗
64. 10.3390/ma603101110.3390/ma6031011 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.02910.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.029 ↗
66. 10.1021/j100290a00110.1021/j100290a001 ↗
67. 10.1126/science.108066410.1126/science.1080664 ↗
68. 10.3390/s10070643910.3390/s100706439 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.bios.2012.06.04510.1016/j.bios.2012.06.045 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.00810.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.008 ↗