journal article·2021-07-14Open access

Composition–Structure–Solubility Relationships in Borosilicate Glasses: Toward a Rational Design of Bioactive Glasses with Controlled Dissolution Behavior

Nicholas Stone-Weiss, Henrik Bradtmüller, Hellmut Eckert, Ashutosh Goel

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 27

Abstract

Owing to their fast but tunable degradation kinetics (in comparison to silicates) and excellent bioactivity, the past decade has witnessed an upsurge in the research interest of borate/borosilicate-based bioactive glasses for their potential use in a wide range of soft tissue regeneration applications. Nevertheless, most of these glasses have been developed using trial-and-error approaches wherein SiO2 has been gradually replaced by B2O3. One major reason for using this empirical approach is the complexity of short-to-intermediate range structures of these glasses which greatly complicate the development of a thorough understanding of composition–structure–solubility relationships in these systems. Transitioning beyond the current style of composition design to a style that facilitates the development of bioactive glasses with controlled ion release tailored for specific patients/diseases requires a deeper understanding of the compositional/structural dependence of glass degradation behavior in vitro and in vivo. Accordingly, the present study aims to decipher the structural drivers controlling the dissolution kinetics and ion-release behavior of potentially bioactive glasses designed in the Na2O–B2O3–P2O5–SiO2 system across a broad compositional space in simulated body environments (pH = 7.4). By employing state-of-the-art spectroscopy-based characterization techniques, it has been shown that the degradation kinetics of borosilicate glasses depend on their R (Na2O/B2O3) and K (SiO2/B2O3) ratios, while the release of particular network-forming moieties from the glass into solution is strongly influenced by their role in—and effect on—the short-to-intermediate-range molecular structure. The current study aims to promote a rational design of borosilicate-based bioactive glasses, where a delicate balance between maximizing soft tissue regeneration and minimizing calcification and cytotoxicity can be achieved by tuning the release of ionic dissolution products (of controlled identity and abundance) from bioactive glasses into physiological media.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States

Institut für Physikalische Chemie, WWU Münster, Corrensstrasse 30, Münster D48149, Germany

Department of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, CP 676, São Carlos, São Paulo 13565-905, Brazil

São Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador Saocarlense 400, São Carlos, São Paulo 13566-590, Brazil

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Funda????o de Amparo ?? Pesquisa do Estado de S??o Paulo · National Science Foundation

References (92)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.11.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.11.001 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10853-016-0563-710.1007/s10853-016-0563-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.12.00310.1016/j.tibtech.2017.12.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.01510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.015 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.00410.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.004 ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.a.3512010.1002/jbm.a.35120 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1012142910.3390/ma10121429 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.01410.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.014 ↗
9. 10.1111/ijag.1220810.1111/ijag.12208 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10856-013-5076-110.1007/s10856-013-5076-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.11.00310.1016/j.jhsb.2004.11.003 ↗
12. 10.3390/app1010342110.3390/app10103421 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.a.3494410.1002/jbm.a.34944 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10439-016-1689-010.1007/s10439-016-1689-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.00710.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
17. Hamilton G. A. · Heart Lung · 1993 · 22 · 308
18. 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90497-w10.1016/0735-1097(91)90497-w ↗
19. 10.1039/c0sm00213e10.1039/c0sm00213e ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.07.00310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.07.003 ↗
21. Jung S. · Wound Repair Regen. · 2011 · 19 · A30
22. 10.1039/c7tb01221g10.1039/c7tb01221g ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b0615510.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06155 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.05410.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.054 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10856-012-4831-z10.1007/s10856-012-4831-z ↗
26. Schoen F. J. · 2020 · 97310.1016/B978-0-12-816137-1.00065-9 ↗
27. Mosier J. · 2017
28. 10.1101/cshperspect.a03530310.1101/cshperspect.a035303 ↗
29. 10.1161/circgenetics.108.84781410.1161/circgenetics.108.847814 ↗
30. 10.1042/cs042028910.1042/cs0420289 ↗
31. 10.1016/0022-3093(78)90020-010.1016/0022-3093(78)90020-0 ↗
32. 10.1016/0022-3093(83)90097-210.1016/0022-3093(83)90097-2 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.08.03310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.08.033 ↗
34. 10.1016/0022-3093(94)90032-910.1016/0022-3093(94)90032-9 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0447010.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04470 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.11989310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.119893 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.02710.1016/j.msec.2015.08.027 ↗
38. 10.7150/ijbs.3235810.7150/ijbs.32358 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598-018-20241-310.1038/s41598-018-20241-3 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.00610.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.006 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.11988910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.119889 ↗
42. 10.1088/1748-605x/ab942110.1088/1748-605x/ab9421 ↗
43. 10.1111/jace.1521610.1111/jace.15216 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.01810.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.018 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.11.03310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.11.033 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.05.03310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.05.033 ↗
47. 10.3390/jfb901002510.3390/jfb9010025 ↗
48. 10.1002/mc.2215310.1002/mc.22153 ↗
49. 10.1002/jcp.2431210.1002/jcp.24312 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0869110.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08691 ↗
51. International Standard. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. Part 14: Identification and Quantification of Degradation Products from Ceramics, ISO 10993-14, 2001.
52. Stone-Weiss, N.; Smith, N. J.; Youngman, R. E.; Pierce, E. M.; Goel, A. Dissolution kinetics of a sodium borosilicate glass in Tris buffer solutions: Impact of Tris concentration and acid (HCl/HNO3) identity, 2020. Submitted.10.1039/D0CP06425D ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.00910.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.009 ↗
54. 10.1002/mrc.98410.1002/mrc.984 ↗
55. 10.1016/0022-2364(90)90130-210.1016/0022-2364(90)90130-2 ↗
56. 10.1016/0022-2364(89)90280-110.1016/0022-2364(89)90280-1 ↗
57. 10.1039/c9cp06064b10.1039/c9cp06064b ↗
58. 10.1021/cm062809210.1021/cm0628092 ↗
59. 10.1021/jp809805z10.1021/jp809805z ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b0054710.1021/acs.jpcb.8b00547 ↗
61. 10.1038/srep0377010.1038/srep03770 ↗
62. 10.1103/physrevb.31.109010.1103/physrevb.31.1090 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.03.03510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.03.035 ↗
64. 10.1111/ijag.1205010.1111/ijag.12050 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.gca.2014.12.00910.1016/j.gca.2014.12.009 ↗
66. 10.1039/an994190216110.1039/an9941902161 ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b1110810.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11108 ↗
68. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b1137110.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11371 ↗
69. 10.1039/c6ra15275a10.1039/c6ra15275a ↗
70. Ebert, W. L. Comparison of the Results of Short-Term Static Tests and Single-Pass Flow-Through Tests with LRM Glass (ANL-06/51); Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), 2007.10.2172/925334 ↗
71. 10.1111/ijag.1204810.1111/ijag.12048 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.02810.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.028 ↗
73. Ebert, W. L. The Effects of the Glass Surface Area/solution Volume Ratio on Glass Corrosion: A Critical Review; Argonne National Laboratory, 1995.10.2172/67461 ↗
74. 10.13182/nt93-a3489810.13182/nt93-a34898 ↗
75. 10.1063/1.34621310.1063/1.346213 ↗
76. 10.1016/s0254-0584(02)00215-810.1016/s0254-0584(02)00215-8 ↗
77. 10.1016/0022-3093(82)90250-210.1016/0022-3093(82)90250-2 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.00510.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.005 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.12.00810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.12.008 ↗
80. 10.1021/j100289a01410.1021/j100289a014 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.07.01410.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.07.014 ↗
82. 10.1557/proc-257-15110.1557/proc-257-151 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.02310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.023 ↗
84. 10.1021/jp034048l10.1021/jp034048l ↗
85. Brauer D. S. · 2016 · 6110.1039/9781782622017-00061 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.saa.2012.02.05110.1016/j.saa.2012.02.051 ↗
87. 10.1021/jp075677o10.1021/jp075677o ↗
88. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b0665410.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06654 ↗
89. 10.1039/c7cp08593a10.1039/c7cp08593a ↗
90. 10.1016/0022-3093(94)90708-010.1016/0022-3093(94)90708-0 ↗
91. 10.1016/s0022-3093(97)90110-110.1016/s0022-3093(97)90110-1 ↗
92. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07139.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07139.x ↗