journal article·2020-04-08Open access

Molecular Recognition at Mineral Interfaces: Implications for the Beneficiation of Rare Earth Ores

Jonathan E. Sutton, Santanu Roy, Azhad U. Chowdhury, Lili Wu, Anna K. Wanhala, Nuwan De Silva, Santa Jansone-Popova, Benjamin P. Hay, Michael C. Cheshire, Theresa L. Windus, Andrew G. Stack, Alexandra Navrotsky, Bruce A. Moyer, Benjamin Doughty, Vyacheslav S. Bryantsev

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

Ce-bastnäsite is the single largest mineral source for light rare-earth elements. In view of the growing industrial importance of rare-earth minerals, it is critical to develop more efficient methods for separating the valuable rare-earth-containing minerals from the surrounding gangue. In this work, we employ a combination of periodic density functional theory (DFT) and molecular mechanics (MM) calculations together with the de novo molecular design program HostDesigner to identify bis-phosphinate ligands that preferentially bind to the (100) Ce-bastnäsite surface rather than the (104) calcite surface. DFT calculations for a simple phosphinate ligand were employed to qualitatively understand key behaviors involved in ligand–metal, ligand–solvent, and solvent–metal interactions. These insights were then used to guide the search for flexible, rigid, and semirigid hydrocarbon linkers to identify candidate bis-phosphinate ligands with the potential to bind preferentially to Ce-bastnäsite. Among the five most promising bis-phosphinate ligands suggested by theoretical studies, three ligands were synthesized and their adsorption characteristics to bastnäsite (100) interfaces were characterized using vibrational sum-frequency (vSFG) spectroscopy, attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The efficacy of the selective interfacial molecular binding was demonstrated by identifying a bis-phosphinate ligand capable of providing an overall higher surface coverage of alkyl groups relative to a monophosphinate ligand. The results highlight the interplay between adsorption binding strength and maximum surface coverage in determining ligand efficiency to render the mineral surface hydrophobic. DFT calculations further indicate that all tested ligands have higher affinity for Ce-bastnäsite than for calcite. This is consistent with the ITC data showing stronger adsorption enthalpy to bastnäsite than to calcite, making these ligands promising candidates for selective flotation of Ce-bastnäsite.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Extraction and Separation Processes · Iron oxide chemistry and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6119, United States

Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and NEAT ORU, University of California Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States

Department of Chemistry and Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3111, United States

Supramolecular Design Institute, 127 Chestnut Hill Rd., Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830-7185, United States

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Lehn J.-M. · 199510.1002/3527607439 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.19901304110.1002/anie.199013041 ↗
3. 10.1039/C7CS00115K10.1039/C7CS00115K ↗
4. 10.1038/365499a010.1038/365499a0 ↗
5. 10.1002/chem.20090090010.1002/chem.200900900 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja00265a04610.1021/ja00265a046 ↗
7. 10.1038/353549a010.1038/353549a0 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja990885i10.1021/ja990885i ↗
9. 10.1038/4552710.1038/45527 ↗
10. 10.1021/cg010289b10.1021/cg010289b ↗
11. 10.1021/ja037614z10.1021/ja037614z ↗
12. 10.1039/b203285f10.1039/b203285f ↗
13. Rai B. · 201210.1201/b11590 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00090-510.1016/S0301-7516(03)00090-5 ↗
15. Pradip · Curr. Sci. · 1992 · 63 · 180
16. 10.1039/C7CP00811B10.1039/C7CP00811B ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0474710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04747 ↗
18. 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-08570010.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085700 ↗
19. 10.1557/mre.2018.710.1557/mre.2018.7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.01710.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.017 ↗
21. Critical Materials Strategy; U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 2011.
22. 10.1021/es203518d10.1021/es203518d ↗
23. Krishnamurthy N. · 2004
24. Pradip · Miner. Metall. Process. · 2013 · 30 · 1
25. 10.3749/canmin.46.4.77910.3749/canmin.46.4.779 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11837-013-0719-810.1007/s11837-013-0719-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00129-510.1016/S0892-6875(97)00129-5 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.aau762810.1126/science.aau7628 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.02510.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.025 ↗
30. 10.1021/ic020292010.1021/ic0202920 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.10.02110.1016/j.mineng.2013.10.021 ↗
32. Ritcey G. M. · 2006 · 2
33. Zhang J. · Nonferrous Met. · 1982 · 34 · 29
34. 10.19150/mmp.761110.19150/mmp.7611 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.07.02310.1016/j.mineng.2018.07.023 ↗
36. Liu W. · Miner. Metall. Process. · 2017 · 34 · 116
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
39. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.13640610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
44. 10.1021/j100016a02210.1021/j100016a022 ↗
45. 2016
46. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja055169x10.1021/ja055169x ↗
48. 10.1021/ja056699w10.1021/ja056699w ↗
49. 10.1021/ic401089u10.1021/ic401089u ↗
50. 10.1021/ja00205a00110.1021/ja00205a001 ↗
51. 10.1021/ja00205a00210.1021/ja00205a002 ↗
52. 10.1021/ja00205a00310.1021/ja00205a003 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b0468710.1021/acs.jpca.5b04687 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0299510.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02995 ↗
55. 10.1021/jo980842510.1021/jo9808425 ↗
56. 10.1016/0010-8545(93)85036-410.1016/0010-8545(93)85036-4 ↗
57. 10.1021/ic001380s10.1021/ic001380s ↗
58. 10.1021/mp034009u10.1021/mp034009u ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.01110.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.011 ↗
60. 10.1364/OL.43.00203810.1364/OL.43.002038 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.508497110.1063/1.5084971 ↗
62. 10.1080/0144235050022589410.1080/01442350500225894 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0164310.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01643 ↗
64. 10.1021/la900168p10.1021/la900168p ↗
65. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0129010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01290 ↗
66. 10.1021/jacs.9b1053610.1021/jacs.9b10536 ↗
67. 10.1366/000370201195124510.1366/0003702011951245 ↗
68. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0349110.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03491 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.23910.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.239 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.06310.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.063 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.07.02610.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.07.026 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2017.08.00610.1016/j.vibspec.2017.08.006 ↗