journal article·2022-05-11Open access

Recreating Fuel Cell Catalyst Degradation in Aqueous Environments for Identical-Location Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies

Haoran Yu, Michael J. Zachman, Chenzhao Li, Leiming Hu, Nancy N. Kariuki, Rangachary Mukundan, Jian Xie, Kenneth C. Neyerlin, Deborah J. Myers, David A. Cullen

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

The recent surge in interest of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) for heavy-duty vehicles increases the demand on the durability of oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts used in the fuel cell cathode. This prioritizes efforts aimed at understanding and subsequently controlling catalyst degradation. Identical-location scanning transmission electron microscopy (IL-STEM) is a powerful method that enables precise characterization of degradation processes in individual catalyst nanoparticles across various stages of cycling. Recreating the degradation processes that occur in PEMFC membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) within the aqueous cell used for IL-STEM experiments is vital for generating an accurate understanding of these processes. In this work, we investigate the type and degree of catalyst degradation achieved by cycling in an aqueous cell compared to a PEMFC MEA. While significant degradation is observed in IL-STEM experiments performed on a traditional Pt catalyst using the standard accelerated stress test potential window (0.6–0.95 VRHE), degradation of a PtCo catalyst designed for heavy-duty vehicle use is very limited compared to that observed in MEAs. We therefore explore various experimental parameters such as temperature, acid type, acid concentration, ionomer content, and potential window to identify conditions that reproduce the degradation observed in MEAs. We find that by extending the cycling potential window to 0.4–1.0 VRHE in an electrolyte containing Pt ions, the degraded particle size distribution and alloy composition better match that observed in MEAs. In particular, these conditions increase the relative contribution of Ostwald ripening, which appears to play a more significant role in the degradation of larger alloy particles supported on high-surface-area carbons than coalescence. Results from this work highlight the potential for discrepancies between ex situ aqueous experiments and MEA tests. While different catalysts may require a unique modification to the AST protocol, strategies provided in this work enable future in situ and identical-location experiments that will play an important role in the development of robust catalysts for heavy-duty vehicle applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States

Chemistry and Nanoscience Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States

Materials Physics and Applications Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States

Funding

Fuel Cell Technologies Office

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.01610.1016/j.joule.2021.05.016 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.00710.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.007 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10071510.1016/j.coelec.2021.100715 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20050438610.1002/anie.200504386 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat184010.1038/nmat1840 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.212666210.1063/1.2126662 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.15680110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.156801 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.205034710.1149/1.2050347 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.187349210.1149/1.1873492 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11244-007-9000-010.1007/s11244-007-9000-0 ↗
12. 10.1021/jp807143e10.1021/jp807143e ↗
13. 10.1149/1.325827510.1149/1.3258275 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.348510410.1149/1.3485104 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.03810.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.038 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.07310.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.073 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.06.01110.1016/j.apcatb.2013.06.011 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.03410.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.034 ↗
19. 10.3390/catal502092610.3390/catal5020926 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0531514jes10.1149/2.0531514jes ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.05810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.058 ↗
22. 10.1149/2.0171806jes10.1149/2.0171806jes ↗
23. 10.1149/1945-7111/abfcd910.1149/1945-7111/abfcd9 ↗
24. 10.1021/cs501537n10.1021/cs501537n ↗
25. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0459810.1021/acscatal.9b04598 ↗
26. 10.1149/1945-7111/abfe4610.1149/1945-7111/abfe46 ↗
27. 10.1021/ac100306c10.1021/ac100306c ↗
28. 10.1007/s12678-017-0378-610.1007/s12678-017-0378-6 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.1071509jes10.1149/2.1071509jes ↗
30. 10.1038/s41929-019-0304-910.1038/s41929-019-0304-9 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.03210.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.032 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0071810.1021/acsenergylett.1c00718 ↗
33. 10.1021/nl203920s10.1021/nl203920s ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.02710.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.027 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.03.00710.1016/j.coelec.2019.03.007 ↗
36. 10.1021/jp506857b10.1021/jp506857b ↗
37. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0200010.1021/acsaem.9b02000 ↗
38. 10.1039/C9EE01185D10.1039/C9EE01185D ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.00310.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.003 ↗
40. 10.1039/C0EE00248H10.1039/C0EE00248H ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.06410.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.064 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.035206jes10.1149/2.035206jes ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.00310.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.003 ↗
44. 10.1149/2.078306jes10.1149/2.078306jes ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.03.02910.1016/j.apcatb.2014.03.029 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.03510.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.035 ↗
47. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0405510.1021/acscatal.7b04055 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.10210210.1016/j.isci.2021.102102 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13851310.1016/j.electacta.2021.138513 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0302210.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03022 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10083210.1016/j.coelec.2021.100832 ↗
52. 10.1149/1945-7111/abdcc910.1149/1945-7111/abdcc9 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41560-021-00824-710.1038/s41560-021-00824-7 ↗
54. 10.1088/2515-7639/ac031910.1088/2515-7639/ac0319 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0133710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01337 ↗
56. 10.1149/2.0411815jes10.1149/2.0411815jes ↗
57. 10.1149/2.0261805jes10.1149/2.0261805jes ↗
58. 10.1002/anie.20201471110.1002/anie.202014711 ↗
59. 10.1002/celc.20150042510.1002/celc.201500425 ↗
60. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc76710.1149/1945-7111/abc767 ↗
61. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office. 3.4. Fuel Cells. Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2017/05/f34/fcto_myrdd_fuel_cells.pdf.
62. 10.1149/2.0031806jes10.1149/2.0031806jes ↗
63. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6676-9_310.1007/978-1-4939-6676-9_3 ↗
64. 10.1088/0022-3727/38/14/02110.1088/0022-3727/38/14/021 ↗
65. 10.1149/2.0371904jes10.1149/2.0371904jes ↗
66. 10.1149/1945-7111/abe28e10.1149/1945-7111/abe28e ↗
67. 10.1021/j100011a00110.1021/j100011a001 ↗
68. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0420510.1021/acscatal.1c04205 ↗
69. 10.1021/ja907149610.1021/ja9071496 ↗
70. 10.1002/anie.20120725610.1002/anie.201207256 ↗
71. 10.1039/C3SC52411F10.1039/C3SC52411F ↗
72. 10.1149/2.0371510jes10.1149/2.0371510jes ↗
73. 10.1149/08008.0275ecst10.1149/08008.0275ecst ↗
74. 10.1149/2.1091410jes10.1149/2.1091410jes ↗
75. 10.1016/B978-0-444-56369-9.00005-810.1016/B978-0-444-56369-9.00005-8 ↗
76. 10.1016/S0167-5729(01)00022-X10.1016/S0167-5729(01)00022-X ↗
77. 10.1149/1.243124010.1149/1.2431240 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.11710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.117 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.09310.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.093 ↗