journal article·2020-09-16

Femtosecond Laser-Induced Vanadium Oxide Metamaterial Nanostructures and the Study of Optical Response by Experiments and Numerical Simulations

Saranya Bhupathi, Shancheng Wang, Mohammad Abutoama, Igal Balin, Lei Wang, Peter G. Kazansky, Yi Long, Ibrahim Abdulhalim

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 37
Publisher page

Abstract

Surface patterning is a popular approach to produce photonic metasurfaces that are tunable when electro-optic, thermo-optic, or magneto-optic materials are used. Vanadium oxides (VyOx) are well-known phase change materials with many applications, especially when used as tunable metamaterial photonic structures. Particularly, VO2 is a well-known thermochromic material for its near-room-temperature phase transition from the insulating to the metallic state. One-dimensional (1D) VO2 nanograting structures are studied by numerical simulation, and the simulation results reveal that the VO2 nanograting structures could enhance the luminous transmittance (Tlum) compared with a pristine flat VO2 surface. It is worth mentioning that Tlum is also polarization-dependent, and both larger grating height and smaller grating periodicity give enhanced Tlum, particularly at TE polarization in both insulating (20 °C) and metallic (90 °C) states of VO2. Femtosecond laser-patterned VO2 films exhibiting nanograting structures with an average periodicity of ≈500–700 nm have been fabricated for the first time to enhance thermochromic properties. Using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, it is shown that at the optimum laser processing conditions, VO2 dominates the film composition, while under extra processing, the existence of other vanadium oxide phases such as V2O3 and V2O5 increases. Such structures show enhanced transmittance in the near-infrared (NIR) region, with an improvement in NIR and solar modulation abilities (ΔTNIR = 10.8%, ΔTsol = 10.9%) compared with a flat VO2 thin film (ΔTNIR = 8%, ΔTsol = 10.2%). The slight reduction in transmittance in the visible region is potentially due to the scattering caused by the imperfect nanograting structures. This new patterning approach helps understand the polarization-dependent optical response of VO2 thin films and opens a new gateway for smart devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, 639798 Singapore

Singapore-HUJ Alliance for Research and Enterprise (SHARE), Nanomaterials for Energy and Energy-Water Nexus (NEW), Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE), 138602 Singapore

Department of Electro-optics and Photonics Engineering, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel

Optoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom

Funding

National Research Foundation Singapore · Ministry of Science, Technology and Space · Ministry of Energy, Israel

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. International Energy Agency. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector; IEA, 2019. https://webstore.iea.org/2019-global-status-report-for-buildings-and-construction (accessed Feb 20, 2020).
2. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.00710.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007 ↗
3. International Energy Agency. Transition to Sustainable Buildings: Strategies & Opportunities to 2050; IEA, 2020. https://webstore.iea.org/transition-to-sustainable-buildings (accessed Feb 20, 2020).
4. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-080615-03464710.1146/annurev-chembioeng-080615-034647 ↗
5. 10.1038/srep0642710.1038/srep06427 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20190206610.1002/aenm.201902066 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.02410.1016/j.joule.2018.12.024 ↗
8. 10.1364/AO.30.00278210.1364/AO.30.002782 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.05310.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.053 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.10910.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.109 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0421210.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04212 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.10994410.1016/j.solmat.2019.109944 ↗
13. 10.1021/am101117210.1021/am1011172 ↗
14. 10.1038/srep0275610.1038/srep02756 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.481387610.1063/1.4813876 ↗
16. 10.1364/OE.23.00A12410.1364/OE.23.00A124 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0223210.1021/acsnano.7b02232 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6TC02694J10.1039/C6TC02694J ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b1217510.1021/acsami.6b12175 ↗
20. 10.1021/la502787q10.1021/la502787q ↗
21. 10.1039/C6RA23504B10.1039/C6RA23504B ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.04510.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.045 ↗
23. 10.1149/1.235970110.1149/1.2359701 ↗
24. 10.1038/ncomms395010.1038/ncomms3950 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20120274910.1002/adma.201202749 ↗
26. 10.1002/smll.20150355310.1002/smll.201503553 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0233610.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02336 ↗
28. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0042610.1021/acssensors.7b00426 ↗
29. 10.1039/c3cc42112k10.1039/c3cc42112k ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0615210.1021/acsnano.6b06152 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.09610.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.096 ↗
32. 10.1109/JSTQE.2016.261418310.1109/JSTQE.2016.2614183 ↗
33. 10.2351/1.471265810.2351/1.4712658 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmat.2019.01.00210.1016/j.jmat.2019.01.002 ↗
35. 10.1364/OME.3.00194410.1364/OME.3.001944 ↗
36. 10.1039/c3lc41171k10.1039/c3lc41171k ↗
37. 10.1364/OL.32.00145910.1364/OL.32.001459 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.03390110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.033901 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0108210.1021/acsphotonics.7b01082 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.504069210.1063/1.5040692 ↗
41. 10.1088/1475-4878/33/3/30110.1088/1475-4878/33/3/301 ↗
42. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM G173-03 Reference Spectra. http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/spectra/am1.5/ASTMG173/ASTMG173.html(accessed Feb 24, 2020).
43. 10.1364/OE.14.01011710.1364/OE.14.010117 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.345650110.1063/1.3456501 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.14210.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.142 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.199199110.1063/1.1991991 ↗
47. 10.1007/s00339-011-6489-710.1007/s00339-011-6489-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2014.03.00210.1016/j.pquantelec.2014.03.002 ↗
49. 10.1021/nn900654v10.1021/nn900654v ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.24740510.1103/PhysRevLett.91.247405 ↗
51. 10.1364/OPTICA.4.00063710.1364/OPTICA.4.000637 ↗
52. 10.1007/s00339010089310.1007/s003390100893 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.10.02210.1016/j.matlet.2007.10.022 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.00910.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.009 ↗
55. 10.1039/C8TC04543G10.1039/C8TC04543G ↗
56. 10.1007/s40195-017-0611-610.1007/s40195-017-0611-6 ↗
57. 10.1039/C6TC03482A10.1039/C6TC03482A ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2006.01.06710.1016/j.jlumin.2006.01.067 ↗
59. 10.1007/s00339-020-3434-710.1007/s00339-020-3434-7 ↗
60. 10.1117/12.89698910.1117/12.896989 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRev.155.84110.1103/PhysRev.155.841 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.171928010.1063/1.1719280 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0051410.1021/acsphotonics.6b00514 ↗
64. 10.1039/C8TC05014G10.1039/C8TC05014G ↗
65. 10.1063/1.355675610.1063/1.3556756 ↗
66. 10.1021/acsami.6b1321710.1021/acsami.6b13217 ↗
67. 10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00881-X10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00881-X ↗
68. 10.1364/JOSAB.29.00266510.1364/JOSAB.29.002665 ↗
69. 10.3390/s1913300310.3390/s19133003 ↗
70. 10.3788/COL20090708.066710.3788/COL20090708.0667 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.03406410.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.034064 ↗
72. 10.1364/OE.27.0A103010.1364/OE.27.0A1030 ↗