journal article·2016-01-13

Interface and Strain Energy Revolution Texture Map To Predict Structure and Optical Properties of Sputtered PbSe Thin Films

Xigui Sun, Kewei Gao, Xiaolu Pang, Huisheng Yang

Publisher page

Abstract

The preferred growth orientation of the sputtered lead selenide (PbSe) thin films on Si(100) substrates was thermodynamically simulated and calculated on the basis of the density functional theory. The results showed that the total free energy variation during the grain growth is dominated by the interface and strain energy minimization under certain conditions, indicating that the preferred growth orientation and related optical properties of the PbSe thin films can be effectively modified by these two energy variations. Thermodynamically, the PbSe[200] and PbSe[220] preferred orientations are obtained when the interface and strain energy minimization dominate the total free energy variation, respectively. A texture map related to the interface and strain energy revolution was obtained, which can be used to predict the structure and optical properties of the sputtered PbSe thin films, and its applicability was confirmed by the real X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy experimental results of four midfrequency sputtered PbSe thin films with designed thickness and microstrain deposited on Si(100) substrates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Physics and Chemistry, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Funding

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · Fok Ying Tong Education Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.486118610.1063/1.4861186 ↗
2. 10.1021/nn901139d10.1021/nn901139d ↗
3. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.10.04810.1016/j.vacuum.2009.10.048 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl025785g10.1021/nl025785g ↗
5. 10.1021/nl902062x10.1021/nl902062x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mee.2007.12.01810.1016/j.mee.2007.12.018 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.08.06910.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.08.069 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl802353x10.1021/nl802353x ↗
9. 10.1063/1.483027610.1063/1.4830276 ↗
10. Ravich Y. I. · 197010.1007/978-1-4684-8607-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.22610.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.226 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10854-014-1799-010.1007/s10854-014-1799-0 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp001488t10.1021/jp001488t ↗
14. 10.1016/S0927-0248(97)00237-710.1016/S0927-0248(97)00237-7 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0013-4686(97)00213-210.1016/S0013-4686(97)00213-2 ↗
16. 10.1039/a706471c10.1039/a706471c ↗
17. 10.1063/1.153490710.1063/1.1534907 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.10010.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.100 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)02528-910.1016/S0022-0248(02)02528-9 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.10020810.1063/1.100208 ↗
21. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/45/45541110.1088/0022-3727/43/45/455411 ↗
22. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.15910.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.159 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.368454310.1063/1.3684543 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.19510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.195 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.09.00910.1016/j.tsf.2015.09.009 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.20542110.1103/PhysRevB.73.205421 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0022-3697(01)00237-210.1016/S0022-3697(01)00237-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.susc.2015.03.02010.1016/j.susc.2015.03.020 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.00810.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.008 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.00310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.003 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.18910.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.189 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.206768810.1063/1.2067688 ↗
33. 10.1080/1478644010852097210.1080/14786440108520972 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2011.10.00810.1016/j.vacuum.2011.10.008 ↗
35. 10.3762/bjnano.3.5010.3762/bjnano.3.50 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.09.04710.1016/j.materresbull.2013.09.047 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.10810.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.108 ↗
38. Hofmann S. · 201310.1007/978-3-642-27381-0 ↗