journal article·2016-03-09

Excavating the Role of Aloe Vera Wrapped Mesoporous Hydroxyapatite Frame Ornamentation in Newly Architectured Polyurethane Scaffolds for Osteogenesis and Guided Bone Regeneration with Microbial Protection

M. Selvakumar, Harpreet Singh Pawar, Nimmy K. Francis, Bodhisatwa Das, Santanu Dhara, Santanu Chattopadhyay

This record is marked as retracted by the source. Review the publisher’s notice before using its findings.
Publisher page

Abstract

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) scaffolds are unsuccessful in many clinical applications due to a high incidence of postoperative infection. The objective of this work is to fabricate GBR with an anti-infective electrospun scaffold by ornamenting segmented polyurethane (SPU) with two-dimensional Aloe vera wrapped mesoporous hydroxyapatite (Al-mHA) nanorods. The antimicrobial characteristic of the scaffold has been retrieved from the prepared Al-mHA frame with high aspect ratio (∼14.2) via biosynthesis route using Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis miller) extract. The Al-mHA frame was introduced into an unprecedented SPU matrix (solution polymerized) based on combinatorial soft segments of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), poly(ethylene carbonate) (PEC), and poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), by an in situ technique followed by electrospinning to fabricate scaffolds. For comparison, pristine mHA nanorods are also ornamented into it. An enzymatic ring-opening polymerization technique was adapted to synthesize soft segment of (PCL-PEC-b-PDMS). Structure elucidation of the synthesized polymers is established by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sparingly, Al-mHA ornamented scaffolds exhibit tremendous improvement (175%) in the mechanical properties with promising antimicrobial activity against various human pathogens. After confirmation of high osteoconductivity, improved biodegradation, and excellent biocompatibility against osteoblast-like MG63 cells (in vitro), the scaffolds were implanted in rabbits as an animal model by subcutaneous and intraosseous (tibial) sites. Improved in vivo biocompatibilities, biodegradation, osteoconductivity, and the ability to provide an adequate biomimetic environment for biomineralization for GBR of the scaffolds (SPU and ornamented SPUs) have been found from the various histological sections. Early cartilage formation, endochondral ossification, and rapid bone healing at 4 weeks were found in the defects filled with Al-mHA ornamented scaffold compared to pristine SPU scaffold. Organ toxicity studies further confirm the absence of appreciable tissue architecture abnormalities in the renal hepatic and cardiac tissue sections. The entire results of this study manifest the feasibility of fabricating a mechanically adequate tailored nanofibrous SPU scaffold based on combinatorial soft segments of PCL, PEC, and PDMS by a biomimetic approach and the advantages of an Aloe vera wrapped mHA frame in promoting osteoblast phenotype progression with microbial protection for potential GBR applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Rubber Technology Centre and ‡School of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.052 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.037 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.044 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.033 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.11010.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.110 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.03510.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.035 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.011 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.043 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.02310.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.023 ↗
11. 10.1038/ncomms493510.1038/ncomms4935 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.02710.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.027 ↗
13. 10.1021/nn506255e10.1021/nn506255e ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.09.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.09.009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.06010.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.060 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.10.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.10.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.06610.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.066 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.013 ↗
19. 10.1166/jbn.2015.197510.1166/jbn.2015.1975 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0003010.1021/acs.macromol.5b00030 ↗
21. 10.1021/ma035385v10.1021/ma035385v ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.07610.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.076 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.5b0624210.1021/acsami.5b06242 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.017 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.00110.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.018 ↗
27. 10.1021/cm400729810.1021/cm4007298 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.02210.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.022 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.03310.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.033 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.04410.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.044 ↗
31. 10.1021/cg501515c10.1021/cg501515c ↗
32. 10.1039/C4GC02445A10.1039/C4GC02445A ↗
33. 10.1021/am401637c10.1021/am401637c ↗
34. 10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.38410.1016/j.burns.2006.10.384 ↗
35. 10.3109/01480545.2013.83435010.3109/01480545.2013.834350 ↗
36. 10.1021/jf034255i10.1021/jf034255i ↗
37. Sharrif Moghaddasi M. · Int. J. Biol. Med. Res. · 2011 · 2 · 466
38. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.04.00610.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.04.006 ↗
39. 10.1021/jf001036d10.1021/jf001036d ↗
40. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.03.00110.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.03.001 ↗
41. 10.1021/cg800641s10.1021/cg800641s ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.08310.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.083 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.01610.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.016 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.05.06910.1016/j.jcis.2006.05.069 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.055 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.5b1172310.1021/acsami.5b11723 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10853-007-1861-x10.1007/s10853-007-1861-x ↗
48. 10.1021/ac990812h10.1021/ac990812h ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20039003310.1002/adma.200390033 ↗
50. 10.1021/la051864710.1021/la0518647 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10853-013-7328-310.1007/s10853-013-7328-3 ↗
52. 10.1039/b900116f10.1039/b900116f ↗
53. 10.1039/b111236h10.1039/b111236h ↗
54. 10.1002/anie.20025069510.1002/anie.200250695 ↗
55. 10.1039/c2jm34367c10.1039/c2jm34367c ↗
56. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.02410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.024 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.02110.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.021 ↗
58. 10.1021/cm061939810.1021/cm0619398 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.008 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.050 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.017 ↗
62. 10.1039/b803718n10.1039/b803718n ↗
63. 10.1038/nbt105510.1038/nbt1055 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.011 ↗
65. 10.1021/bm061134t10.1021/bm061134t ↗
66. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.05110.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.051 ↗