Graphite-Based Bioinspired Piezoresistive Soft Strain Sensors with Performance Optimized for Low Strain Values
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the custom-made graphite-based piezoresistive strain sensor with gecko foot-inspired macroscopic features realized using a Velcro tape on Ecoflex substrate. The Velcro-based design provides an inexpensive and easy approach for the development of soft sensors with appreciable improvement in the performance even at low strain values. The sensor demonstrated excellent response (sensitivity of ∼16 500%, gauge factor of ∼3800) for 24% linear strain. The fabricated device showed a high gauge factor (>100) even for very low strain values. The sensor has been extensively characterized with a view to potentially use in soft robotics applications where high performance is needed at lower strain values. It is observed that the piezoresistive behavior of strain sensors is governed by several factors such as the supporting elastic medium, architecture of the strain sensor, material properties, strain rate and deformation sequence, and direction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bendable Electronics and Sensing Technologies (BEST) Group, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · H2020 Marie Sk??odowska-Curie Actions
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C6NR02172G10.1039/C6NR02172G ↗
2. Dahiya R. S. · 201310.1007/978-94-007-0579-1 ↗
3. 10.1002/aelm.20200005810.1002/aelm.202000058 ↗
4. 10.1109/TED.2020.298273210.1109/TED.2020.2982732 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0050010.1021/acs.accounts.8b00500 ↗
6. 10.1039/C7MH00071E10.1039/C7MH00071E ↗
7. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.08.05110.1016/j.sna.2017.08.051 ↗
8. 10.1002/aelm.20200044510.1002/aelm.202000445 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.10.00710.1016/j.sna.2016.10.007 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.27910.1016/j.procir.2017.03.279 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0017910.1021/acsaelm.1c00179 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20150475510.1002/adfm.201504755 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20140037910.1002/adfm.201400379 ↗
14. 10.1002/admi.20190098510.1002/admi.201900985 ↗
15. 10.1002/aisy.20210009210.1002/aisy.202100092 ↗
16. 10.1002/aisy.20190014510.1002/aisy.201900145 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10061710.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100617 ↗
18. 10.1002/admt.20170013610.1002/admt.201700136 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0027810.1021/acsaelm.0c00278 ↗
20. 10.1002/aisy.20190016510.1002/aisy.201900165 ↗
21. 10.1002/adom.20160045110.1002/adom.201600451 ↗
22. 10.1002/aisy.20200003910.1002/aisy.202000039 ↗
23. 10.1021/nn501204t10.1021/nn501204t ↗
24. 10.1016/j.sna.2012.11.00610.1016/j.sna.2012.11.006 ↗
25. 10.1109/JSEN.2013.226379710.1109/JSEN.2013.2263797 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.14210.1016/j.cej.2019.04.142 ↗
27. 10.1002/admt.20170007010.1002/admt.201700070 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.7b0155110.1021/acsami.7b01551 ↗
29. 10.1088/1361-6528/aab88810.1088/1361-6528/aab888 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0780510.1021/acsnano.8b07805 ↗
31. 10.1002/smll.20180549310.1002/smll.201805493 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.190953211710.1073/pnas.1909532117 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-018-07672-210.1038/s41467-018-07672-2 ↗
34. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.304828210.1109/JIOT.2020.3048282 ↗
35. 10.1109/JPROC.2019.294136610.1109/JPROC.2019.2941366 ↗
36. 10.1039/C7NR09472H10.1039/C7NR09472H ↗
37. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0489810.1021/acsnano.7b04898 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.8b2076810.1021/acsami.8b20768 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41586-020-2892-610.1038/s41586-020-2892-6 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10853-018-2954-410.1007/s10853-018-2954-4 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10797210.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107972 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.6b1241510.1021/acsami.6b12415 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0150510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01505 ↗
44. 10.1109/TIE.2018.288420410.1109/TIE.2018.2884204 ↗
45. 10.1038/nmat133910.1038/nmat1339 ↗
46. 10.1039/C9MH00389D10.1039/C9MH00389D ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10884610.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108846 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.9b0861110.1021/acsami.9b08611 ↗
49. 10.3389/fmats.2021.63982310.3389/fmats.2021.639823 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.12.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.12.025 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.34210.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.342 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.13843710.1016/j.cplett.2021.138437 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10573510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105735 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.03410.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.034 ↗
56. 10.1039/C7NR09022F10.1039/C7NR09022F ↗
57. 10.1021/acsami.8b1584810.1021/acsami.8b15848 ↗
58. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa79c310.1088/1361-665X/aa79c3 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.031 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsami.7b1867710.1021/acsami.7b18677 ↗
61. 10.1039/C7TC03636A10.1039/C7TC03636A ↗
62. 10.1088/1361-665X/aaaba010.1088/1361-665X/aaaba0 ↗
63. 10.1039/C8TC02702A10.1039/C8TC02702A ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.006 ↗
65. 10.1039/C7RA01837A10.1039/C7RA01837A ↗
66. 10.1039/C8TC01924J10.1039/C8TC01924J ↗
67. 10.1021/acsami.8b2090210.1021/acsami.8b20902 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10061710.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100617 ↗
69. 10.1002/aisy.20200019410.1002/aisy.202000194 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.03010.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.030 ↗
71. 10.1002/adfm.20190851410.1002/adfm.201908514 ↗
72. 10.1021/acsami.5b1258810.1021/acsami.5b12588 ↗
73. 10.1002/admt.20190073310.1002/admt.201900733 ↗
74. Gholami, M.; Ejupi, A.; Rezaei, A.; Ferrone, A.; Menon, C. In Estimation of Knee Joint Angle Using A Fabric-Based Strain Sensor and Machine Learning: A Preliminary Investigation, 2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob); IEEE, 2018; pp 589–594.10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487199 ↗
75. 10.3389/frobt.2019.0002710.3389/frobt.2019.00027 ↗