journal article·2019-06-05

Modulation of Cellular Colonization of Porous Polyurethane Scaffolds via the Control of Pore Interconnection Size and Nanoscale Surface Modifications

G. Lutzweiler, J. Barthes, G. Koenig, H. Kerdjoudj, J. Mayingi, F. Boulmedais, P. Schaaf, W. Drenckhan, N. E. Vrana

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Full-scale cell penetration within porous scaffolds is required to obtain functional connective tissue components in tissue engineering applications. For this aim, we produced porous polyurethane structures with well-controlled pore and interconnection sizes. Although the influence of the pore size on cellular behavior is widely studied, we focused on the impact of the size of the interconnections on the colonization by NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJMSCs). To render the material hydrophilic and allow good material wettability, we treated the material either by plasma or by polydopamine (PDA) coating. We show that cells weakly adhere on these surfaces. Keeping the average pore diameter constant at 133 μm, we compare two structures, one with LARGE (52 μm) and one with SMALL (27 μm) interconnection diameters. DNA quantification and extracellular matrix (ECM) production reveal that larger interconnections is more suitable for cells to move across the scaffold and form a three-dimensional cellular network. We argue that LARGE interconnections favor cell communication between different pores, which then favors the production of the ECM. Moreover, PDA treatment shows a truly beneficial effect on fibroblast viability and on matrix production, whereas plasma treatment shows the same effect for WJMSCs. We, therefore, claim that both pore interconnection size and surface treatment play a significant role to improve the quality of integration of tissue engineering scaffolds.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale, UMR_S 1121, 11 rue Humann, 67085 Strasbourg Cedex, France

Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, 67000 Strasbourg, France

Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Institut Charles Sadron, 23 rue de Loess, 67034 Strasbourg, France

Protip Medical SAS, 8 Place de l’Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France

EA 4691, Biomateŕiaux et Inflammation en Site Osseux (BIOS), SFR-CAP Santé (FED4231), Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France

UFR d’Odontologie, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France

Cetim Grand Est, 24a Rue d’Alsace, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Universit? de Strasbourg · H2020 LEIT Advanced Materials · Materials Institut Carnot Alsace

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/mrs2003.8510.1557/mrs2003.85 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
4. 10.1002/masy.20085091310.1002/masy.200850913 ↗
5. 10.1371/journal.pone.002048010.1371/journal.pone.0020480 ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.b.3354710.1002/jbm.b.33547 ↗
7. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.209310.1089/ten.2006.12.2093 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10853-008-3037-810.1007/s10853-008-3037-8 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11095-008-9618-z10.1007/s11095-008-9618-z ↗
10. 10.1007/s10856-006-0610-z10.1007/s10856-006-0610-z ↗
11. 10.1002/adhm.20140001810.1002/adhm.201400018 ↗
12. 10.1021/bm100199m10.1021/bm100199m ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.00310.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.5b0822110.1021/acsami.5b08221 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10856-007-3001-110.1007/s10856-007-3001-1 ↗
17. 10.1002/term.35010.1002/term.350 ↗
18. 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.054510.1089/ten.tea.2013.0545 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.09.04110.1016/j.polymer.2013.09.041 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.031 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.100644210710.1073/pnas.1006442107 ↗
22. 10.1089/10763270130000326910.1089/107632701300003269 ↗
23. 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90028-010.1016/0142-9612(94)90028-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.02.00610.1016/j.actbio.2009.02.006 ↗
25. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.026210.1089/ten.tea.2009.0262 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.12810.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.128 ↗
27. 10.1002/jbm.82028030710.1002/jbm.820280307 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.07110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.071 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.02410.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.024 ↗
31. 10.1002/jbm.a.3119410.1002/jbm.a.31194 ↗
32. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
33. 10.1002/aic.1039010.1002/aic.10390 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10439-013-0815-510.1007/s10439-013-0815-5 ↗
35. 10.1155/2016/681098010.1155/2016/6810980 ↗
36. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
37. 10.1088/0957-0233/18/1/02610.1088/0957-0233/18/1/026 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.041 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10856-005-2612-710.1007/s10856-005-2612-7 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.002 ↗
41. 10.1002/app.2625010.1002/app.26250 ↗
42. 10.1021/la501560z10.1021/la501560z ↗
43. 10.1038/s41467-018-06183-410.1038/s41467-018-06183-4 ↗
44. 10.1002/adma.20170448610.1002/adma.201704486 ↗
45. 10.1002/term.170110.1002/term.1701 ↗
46. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19971120)56:4<422::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19971120)56:4<422::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
47. 10.1021/la104981s10.1021/la104981s ↗
48. 10.1021/la102825p10.1021/la102825p ↗
49. 10.1002/mabi.20130020310.1002/mabi.201300203 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.14010.1016/j.msec.2017.05.140 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.06710.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.067 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.00510.1016/j.msec.2018.06.005 ↗
53. 10.3390/ma1109166410.3390/ma11091664 ↗