Electrospun TiO2 Fiber Composite Photoelectrodes for Water Splitting
Source abstract
Abstract
This work has focused on the development of electrospun TiO2 fiber composite photoelectrodes for hydrogen production by water splitting. For comparison, similar photoelectrodes were also developed using commercial TiO2 (Aeroxide P25) nanoparticles (NPs). Dispersions of either fibers or P25 NPs were used to make homogenous TiO2 films on fluorine-doped SnO2 (FTO) glass substrates by a doctor blade (DB) technique. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed a much lower packing density of the DB fibers, with respect to DB-P25 TiO2 NPs; this was also directly reflected by the higher photocurrent measured for the NPs when irradiating the photoelectrodes at a light intensity of 1.5AM (1 sun, 1000 W/m(2)). For a better comparison of fibers vs. NPs, composite photoelectrodes by dip-coating (onto FTO) TiO2 sol-gel (SG) matrixes containing an equal amount (5 or 20 wt %) of either fibers or P25 NPs were also investigated. It emerged that the photoactivity of the fibers was significantly higher. For composites containing 5 wt % TiO2 fibers, a photocurrent of 0.5 mA/cm(2) (at 0.23 V vs Ag/AgCl) was measured, whereas 5 wt % P25 NPs only provided 0.2 mA/cm(2). When increasing to 20 wt % fibers or NPs, the photocurrent decreased, because of the formation of microcracks in the photoelectrodes, because of the shrinkage of the sol-gel. The high photoactivity of the fiber-based electrodes could be confirmed by incident photon to current efficiency (IPCE) measurements. Remarkably, the IPCE of composites containing 5 wt % fibers was between 35% and 40% in the region of 380-320 nm, and when accounting for transmission/reflection losses, the absorbed photon to current efficiency (APCE) was consistently over 60% between 380 nm and 320 nm. The superior photoactivity is attributed to the enhanced electron transport in the electrospun fibers, with respect to P25 NPs. According to this study, it is clear that the electronic connectivity ensured by the sol-gel also contributes positively to the enhanced photocurrent.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory for High Performance Ceramics, EMPA-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science & Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Laboratory of Ceramic Materials, Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-190, Brazil
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Walter M. G. · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 644610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
2. Linsebigler A. L. · Chem. Rev. · 1995 · 95 · 73510.1021/cr00035a013 ↗
3. Bak T. · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2002 · 27 · 99110.1016/S0360-3199(02)00022-8 ↗
4. Ni M. · Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. · 2007 · 11 · 40110.1016/j.rser.2005.01.009 ↗
5. Fujishima A. · Nature · 1972 · 238 · 3710.1038/238037a0 ↗
6. Fujishima A. · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 2008 · 63 · 51510.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001 ↗
7. Chen X. · Chem. Rev. · 2007 · 107 · 289110.1021/cr0500535 ↗
8. Anta J. A. · Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2012 · 17 · 12410.1016/j.cocis.2012.02.003 ↗
9. Wahl A. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 782010.1021/jp9814000 ↗
10. Solarska R. · Electrochim. Acta · 2006 · 52 · 69410.1016/j.electacta.2006.06.008 ↗
11. Cowan A. J. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 420810.1021/jp909993w ↗
12. Cowan A. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1013410.1021/ja200800t ↗
13. Kudo A. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2009 · 38 · 25310.1039/B800489G ↗
14. Chen X. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2012 · 41 · 790910.1039/c2cs35230c ↗
15. Augustynski J. · Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 3 · 181010.1039/c3cy00056g ↗
16. Ghadiri E. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 163210.1021/nl904125q ↗
17. Choi S. K. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1647510.1021/jp104317x ↗
18. Kayes B. M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 11430210.1063/1.1901835 ↗
19. Alves A. K. · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2009 · 44 · 31210.1016/j.materresbull.2008.06.001 ↗
20. Waldner G. · Int. J. Photoenergy · 2003 · 5 · 11510.1155/S1110662X03000229 ↗
21. Hartmann P. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 314710.1021/nn1004765 ↗
22. Tsekouras G. · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2010 · 16 · 164110.1109/JSTQE.2010.2049734 ↗
23. Van de Krol R. · 2012
24. Hisatomi T. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 269910.1002/adma.201104868 ↗
25. 10.1557/opl.2012.136510.1557/opl.2012.1365 ↗
26. Hurum D. C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 454510.1021/jp0273934 ↗
27. Kho Y. K. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 282110.1021/jp910810r ↗
28. Scanlon D. O. · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 79810.1038/nmat3697 ↗
29. Hanaor D. A. H. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 46 · 85510.1007/s10853-010-5113-0 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mser.2013.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2013.10.001 ↗