Sulfur Contents in Sulfonated Hyaluronic Acid Direct the Cardiovascular Cells Fate
Source abstract
Abstract
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is recognized as a functional carbohydrate polymer applied for the surface modification of cardiovascular implanted materials due to its molecular weight (MW) dependent cellular regulation. However, due to the enzyme digestion of hyaluronidase on HA in vivo, the stability of HA MW needs to be further improved. It has been reported that the stability of HA MW can be improved by sulfonation. In this study, sulfonated hyaluronic acids (S-HA) with sulfur content of 2.06, 3.69, 7.10, 8.98, and 9.71 were prepared through different sulfuric acid treatment procedures. Cell tests showed that S-HA with higher sulfur content played a significant role in promoting the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells and regulating smooth muscle cells to the physiological phenotype. In addition, it was also proved to inhibit the inflammatory macrophages adhesion/activation. Our data indicates that S-HA may be a better carbohydrate polymer for potential application of cardiovascular biomaterials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering & Henan Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium Alloy & Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Mold Technology (Ministry of Education), Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
Funding
Top Doctor Program of Zhengzhou University · Key Projects of the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1056/NEJMoa101284810.1056/NEJMoa1012848 ↗
2. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.610.1038/natrevmats.2015.6 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.5b0742710.1021/acsami.5b07427 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.02810.1016/j.msec.2016.09.028 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.04.00810.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.04.008 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10853-015-8889-010.1007/s10853-015-8889-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.09210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.092 ↗
8. 10.1039/c4tb00185k10.1039/c4tb00185k ↗
9. 10.1039/C6RA04525A10.1039/C6RA04525A ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.12710.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.127 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7TB02162C10.1039/C7TB02162C ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.24110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.241 ↗
13. 10.1557/jmr.2018.41010.1557/jmr.2018.410 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.3672310.1002/jbm.a.36723 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.07810.1016/j.msec.2018.11.078 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11636410.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116364 ↗
17. 10.3390/molecules2511264910.3390/molecules25112649 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.029 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b0018110.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00181 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.7b0744410.1021/acsami.7b07444 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11060710.1016/j.msec.2019.110607 ↗
22. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.381710.1006/jmbi.2000.3817 ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.b.3457410.1002/jbm.b.34574 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.02810.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.028 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11644310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116443 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.08510.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.085 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0008-6215(01)00066-010.1016/S0008-6215(01)00066-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/0049-3848(96)00009-610.1016/0049-3848(96)00009-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.01510.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.015 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.02.00810.1016/j.msec.2014.02.008 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym911059810.3390/polym9110598 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.5b0742710.1021/acsami.5b07427 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10856-017-5939-y10.1007/s10856-017-5939-y ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.033 ↗
35. 10.1556/EuJMI.3.2013.3.810.1556/EuJMI.3.2013.3.8 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11083110.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110831 ↗
37. 10.1039/C9BM00128J10.1039/C9BM00128J ↗