journal article·2020-10-07Open access

Metal–Organic Framework–Polyacrylonitrile Composite Beads for Xenon Capture

Brian J. Riley, Saehwa Chong, Wenbin Kuang, Tamas Varga, Ahmed S. Helal, Mitchell Galanek, Ju Li, Zayne J. Nelson, Praveen K. Thallapally

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 40

Abstract

Mechanically robust forms of HKUST-1 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were fabricated by embedding the MOF crystals in a passive polyacrylonitrile (PAN) matrix at different MOF loadings of 10-90 mass %. PAN is highly porous and acts as a scaffold that holds the active MOF adsorbent in place. These MOF-PAN composites were then evaluated for capturing Xe. Data presented herein show that the PAN matrix does not notably interfere with the Xe capture process, where the Xe capacities scale somewhat linearly with the increase in MOF loadings within the composites. Also, γ radiation exposures to the composites revealed that they are highly tolerant to these types of radiation fields.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Radioactive element chemistry and processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Blvd, Richland, Washington 99354, United States

Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Office of Environment, Health & Safety, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/2013/70249610.1155/2013/702496 ↗
2. 10.1080/00295450.2017.136980210.1080/00295450.2017.1369802 ↗
3. 10.1080/00295450.2018.152363910.1080/00295450.2018.1523639 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.03250710.1103/PhysRevA.91.032507 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.02510.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.025 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11214-011-9852-210.1007/s11214-011-9852-2 ↗
7. 10.1177/0310057X920200011310.1177/0310057X9202000113 ↗
8. Claude G. · Cr. Hebd. Acad. Sci. · 1934 · 198 · 1959
9. Collard G. · Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. · 1979 · 31 · 514
10. 10.1038/ncomms1183110.1038/ncomms11831 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0486810.1021/acs.iecr.6b04868 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsanm.7b0034310.1021/acsanm.7b00343 ↗
13. 10.1038/nature0385210.1038/nature03852 ↗
14. 10.1038/nature0165010.1038/nature01650 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp501495f10.1021/jp501495f ↗
16. 10.1039/C3CC47777K10.1039/C3CC47777K ↗
17. 10.1002/ijch.20180011710.1002/ijch.201800117 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.09.00510.1016/j.micromeso.2016.09.005 ↗
19. 10.1021/jp303274m10.1021/jp303274m ↗
20. 10.1039/C1CC14685H10.1039/C1CC14685H ↗
21. 10.1021/ja302071t10.1021/ja302071t ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0504810.1021/acs.chemmater.9b05048 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.9b0342210.1021/jacs.9b03422 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.5b0255610.1021/jacs.5b02556 ↗
25. 10.1039/C7TA02746J10.1039/C7TA02746J ↗
26. 10.1039/C8TA03991G10.1039/C8TA03991G ↗
27. 10.1039/C5TA00460H10.1039/C5TA00460H ↗
28. 10.1021/la301870n10.1021/la301870n ↗
29. 10.1021/ie502156h10.1021/ie502156h ↗
30. 10.1038/nmat403510.1038/nmat4035 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12207310.1016/j.cej.2019.122073 ↗
32. 10.1039/c2sc01097f10.1039/c2sc01097f ↗
33. 10.1021/jp302808j10.1021/jp302808j ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ces.2017.02.01010.1016/j.ces.2017.02.010 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0147510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01475 ↗
36. 10.1002/anie.20200420510.1002/anie.202004205 ↗
37. 10.1039/C7SC04152G10.1039/C7SC04152G ↗
38. 10.1039/C6RE00065G10.1039/C6RE00065G ↗
39. 10.1021/es405807w10.1021/es405807w ↗
40. Riley, B. J.; Garn, T. Purification of Gas and Liquid Streams Using Composite Sorbents Embedded in a Polyacrylonitrile Matrix. Advances in Materials Science Research;Wythers, M., Ed. Nova Science Publishers, 2019; 35, pp 119–147.
41. 10.1002/chem.20170266810.1002/chem.201702668 ↗