journal article·2015-06-17

Comparative Study on Electronic Structures of Sc and Ti Contacts with Monolayer and Multilayer MoS2

Zhongjun Li, Xingxing Li, Jinlong Yang

Publisher page

Abstract

Understanding the nature of the contacts in devices based on MoS2 with metal electrodes is vital to enhancing carrier injection efficiency. In this work, geometric and electronic structures of Sc and Ti contacts with MoS2 have been comparatively studied by first-principles calculations. The analyses of geometric parameters, charge density distributions, and density of states for the Sc and Ti top contacts with monolayer MoS2 (mMoS2) indicate that the interface bonding results in the localization of 4d states of Mo atoms and the consequent metallization of mMoS2. Therefore, the Sc and Ti top contacts with mMoS2 are Ohmic, and electron injections via these contacts are efficient. Because of the formations of the metalized Sc-mMoS2 and Ti-mMoS2 complexes, in the Sc and Ti top contacts with multilayer MoS2, Schottky interfaces may be formed in two contact regions. One is in the edge contacts of the Sc-mMoS2 and Ti-mMoS2 complexes with mMoS2 in the channel region in which Schottky barrier heights of 0.11 and 0.39 eV are extracted, respectively. The other is in the top contacts of these two complexes with mMoS2 under the contacts in which Schottky barrier heights of 0.15 and 0.34 eV are obtained, respectively. Moreover, as the layer number of MoS2 increases in the top contacts, the Schottky barrier heights show decreasing trends. These trends can be understood on the basis of the changes of electron affinity of multilayer MoS2. According to the present results, the device based on MoS2 with Sc electrodes should have better electron injection efficiency and stronger back-gated manipulation of current than the one with Ti electrodes. Furthermore, the electron injection efficiency can be enhanced by using multilayer MoS2. These predictions are generally consistent with recent experimental observations and provide a delicate understanding of the contacts in these devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China

School of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China

Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Chinese Academy of Sciences

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Mak K. F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 136805/1
2. Salmani J. M. · Int. Semicond. Device. Res. Symp., 5th · 2011 · 517 · 1
3. Amani M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 193107/110.1063/1.4804546 ↗
4. Zeng H. L. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 49010.1038/nnano.2012.95 ↗
5. Splendiani A. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 127110.1021/nl903868w ↗
6. Bertolazzi S. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 970310.1021/nn203879f ↗
7. Liu H. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 856310.1021/nn303513c ↗
8. Ghatak S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 122103/110.1063/1.4821185 ↗
9. Liu H. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2012 · 33 · 54610.1109/LED.2012.2184520 ↗
10. Radisavljevic B. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 14710.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
11. Lu N. · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 456610.1039/C4NR00783B ↗
12. Xiao D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 196802/1
13. Myoung N. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 702110.1021/nn402919d ↗
14. Lopez-Sanchez O. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 49710.1038/nnano.2013.100 ↗
15. Zhang W. J. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 345610.1002/adma.201301244 ↗
16. Choi W. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 583210.1002/adma.201201909 ↗
17. Li H. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 6310.1002/smll.201101016 ↗
18. Jaramillo T. F. · Science · 2007 · 317 · 10010.1126/science.1141483 ↗
19. Xiang Q. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 657510.1021/ja302846n ↗
20. Yoon Y. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 376810.1021/nl2018178 ↗
21. Jena D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 136805/110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.136805 ↗
22. Liu H. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 103110.1021/nn405916t ↗
23. Chen W. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 50910.1021/nl303909f ↗
24. Neal A. T. · Device Research Conference · 2012 · 6510.1109/DRC.2012.6256928 ↗
25. Fontana M. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 1634/110.1038/srep01634 ↗
26. Qiu H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 123104/1
27. Das S. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 10010.1021/nl303583v ↗
28. Popov I. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 156802/1
29. Gong C. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 171410.1021/nl403465v ↗
30. Kang J. H. · Phys. Rev. X · 2014 · 4 · 031005/1
31. Kang J. H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 093106/1
32. Pradhan N. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 123105/110.1063/1.4799172 ↗
33. Kresse G. · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
34. Blochl P. E. · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
35. Ceperley D. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1980 · 45 · 56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗