Impact of Platinum Primary Particle Loading on Fuel Cell Performance: Insights from Catalyst/Ionomer Ink Interactions
Source abstract
Abstract
A variety of electrochemical energy conversion technologies, including fuel cells, rely on solution-processing techniques (via inks) to form their catalyst layers (CLs). The CLs are heterogeneous structures, often with uneven ion-conducting polymer (ionomer) coverage and underutilized catalysts. Various platinum-supported-on-carbon colloidal catalyst particles are used, but little is known about how or why changing the primary particle loading (PPL, or the weight fraction of platinum of the carbon-platinum catalyst particles) impacts performance. By investigating the CL gas-transport resistance and zeta (ζ)-potentials of the corresponding inks as a function of PPL, a direct correlation between the CL high current density performance and ink ζ-potential is observed. This correlation stems from likely changes in ionomer distributions and catalyst-particle agglomeration as a function of PPL, as revealed by pH, ζ-potential, and impedance measurements. These findings are critical to unraveling the ionomer distribution heterogeneity in ink-based CLs and enabling enhanced Pt utilization and improved device performance for fuel cells and related electrochemical devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720 United States
Energy Technologies Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 United States
Chemistry and Nanoscience Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401 United States
Funding
Division of Graduate Education · Fuel Cell Technologies Office
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c4ta02952f10.1039/c4ta02952f ↗
2. 10.1149/2.0031907jes10.1149/2.0031907jes ↗
3. 10.1016/j.coelec.2017.08.01810.1016/j.coelec.2017.08.018 ↗
4. 10.1021/cm401445h10.1021/cm401445h ↗
5. 10.1149/1.187349210.1149/1.1873492 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.235619210.1149/1.2356192 ↗
7. 10.1149/1945-7111/abf2b010.1149/1945-7111/abf2b0 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms622910.1038/ncomms6229 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.6b0718810.1021/acsami.6b07188 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.074 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0293310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02933 ↗
12. 10.1149/2.0571813jes10.1149/2.0571813jes ↗
13. 10.1002/fuce.20130000810.1002/fuce.201300008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.10410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.104 ↗
15. 10.1149/2.061212jes10.1149/2.061212jes ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.12610.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.126 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.1621704jes10.1149/2.1621704jes ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.026 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.0541803jes10.1149/2.0541803jes ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.7b0971610.1021/acsami.7b09716 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10074410.1016/j.coelec.2021.100744 ↗
22. 10.1039/c7ta07255d10.1039/c7ta07255d ↗
23. 10.1149/2.0191805jes10.1149/2.0191805jes ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.9b1761410.1021/acsami.9b17614 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.01510.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.015 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.1251814jes10.1149/2.1251814jes ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.01.01510.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.01.015 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.8b2064510.1021/acsami.8b20645 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.00610.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.006 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.1c0761110.1021/acsami.1c07611 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.8b1503910.1021/acsami.8b15039 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0086610.1021/acsenergylett.1c00866 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.11205110.1016/j.enconman.2019.112051 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b0649310.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06493 ↗
35. 10.1149/2.040308jes10.1149/2.040308jes ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.01.02610.1016/j.jelechem.2013.01.026 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.03610.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.036 ↗
38. Diard J.-P. · 2020
39. Open Source Impedance Fitter. https://github.com/NREL/OSIF. (Accessed on June 1, 2022).
40. Israelachvili J. N. · 2011 · 3
41. 10.1021/ma00156a01610.1021/ma00156a016 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0272610.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02726 ↗
43. 10.1149/2.072308jes10.1149/2.072308jes ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11356110.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113561 ↗