Efficiency Considerations for SnO2-Based Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
A comparative study of mesoporous thin films based on SnO2 (rutile) and TiO2 (anatase) nanocrystallites sensitized to visible light with [Ru(dtb)2(dcb)](PF6)2, where dtb = 4,4′-(tert-butyl)2-2,2′-bipyridine and dcb = 4,4′-(CO2H)2-2,2′-bipyridine, in CH3CN electrolyte solutions is reported to identify the reason(s) for the low efficiency of SnO2-based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Pulsed laser excitation resulted in rapid excited state injection (kinj > 108 s–1) followed by sensitizer regeneration through iodide oxidation to yield an interfacial charge separated state abbreviated as MO2(e–)|Ru + I3–. Spectral features associated with I3– and the injected electron MO2(e–) were observed as well as a hypsochromic shift of the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer absorption of the sensitizer attributed to an electric field. The field magnitude ranged from 0.008 to 0.39 MV/cm and was dependent on the electrolyte cation (Mg2+ or Li+) as well as the oxide material. Average MO2(e–) + I3– → recombination rate constants quantified spectroscopically were about 25 times smaller for SnO2 (6.0 ± 0.14 s–1) than for TiO2 (160 ± 10 s–1). Transient photovoltage measurements of operational DSSCs indicated a 78 ms lifetime for electrons injected into SnO2 compared to 27 ms for TiO2; behavior that is at odds with the view that recombination with I3– underlies the low efficiencies of nanocrystalline SnO2-based DSSCs. In contrast, the average rate constant for charge recombination with the oxidized sensitizer, MO2(e–)|−S+ → MO2|−S, was about 2 orders of magnitude larger for SnO2 (k = 9.8 × 104 s–1) than for TiO2 (k = 1.6 × 103 s–1). Sensitizer regeneration through iodide oxidation were similar for both oxide materials (kreg = 6 ± 1 × 1010 M–1 s–1). The data indicate that enhanced efficiency from SnO2-based DSSCs can be achieved by identifying alternative redox mediators that enable rapid sensitizer regeneration and by inhibiting recombination of the injected electron with the oxidized sensitizer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/353737a010.1038/353737a0 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr00033a00310.1021/cr00033a003 ↗
3. 10.1039/b804321n10.1039/b804321n ↗
4. 10.1021/jp050145y10.1021/jp050145y ↗
5. 10.1149/1.213309010.1149/1.2133090 ↗
6. 10.1021/nn201243y10.1021/nn201243y ↗
7. 10.1038/nchem.186110.1038/nchem.1861 ↗
8. 10.1002/admi.20180040810.1002/admi.201800408 ↗
9. 10.1039/c6ee02390h10.1039/c6ee02390h ↗
10. 10.1002/solr.20190019810.1002/solr.201900198 ↗
11. 10.1021/jz100361f10.1021/jz100361f ↗
12. 10.1021/jp407587r10.1021/jp407587r ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.6b0646610.1021/jacs.6b06466 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0547010.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05470 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsaem.7b0027410.1021/acsaem.7b00274 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0221610.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02216 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.6b0045410.1021/jacs.6b00454 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja909781g10.1021/ja909781g ↗
19. 10.1021/jz401468910.1021/jz4014689 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0443810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04438 ↗
21. 10.1021/jp982525810.1021/jp9825258 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp500493t10.1021/jp500493t ↗
23. 10.1021/cm011596810.1021/cm0115968 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0734210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07342 ↗
25. 10.1021/ja102334h10.1021/ja102334h ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.5b1299610.1021/jacs.5b12996 ↗
27. 10.1039/tf970660008010.1039/tf9706600080 ↗
28. 10.1021/jp501814r10.1021/jp501814r ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.7b0154210.1021/acsami.7b01542 ↗
30. 10.1021/ja311640f10.1021/ja311640f ↗
31. 10.1021/nn403714s10.1021/nn403714s ↗
32. 10.1021/ja00067a06310.1021/ja00067a063 ↗
33. 10.1021/cr900356p10.1021/cr900356p ↗
34. 10.1021/jz101311d10.1021/jz101311d ↗
35. 10.1021/jp102349m10.1021/jp102349m ↗
36. 10.1039/c3cp44170a10.1039/c3cp44170a ↗
37. Haynes W. M. · 201410.1201/b17118 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20120137210.1002/adma.201201372 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0056910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00569 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.02.01510.1016/j.ccr.2004.02.015 ↗
41. 10.1021/ja00152a02810.1021/ja00152a028 ↗
42. Barr, T. J. Interfacial Electron Transfer at Sensitized Nanocrystalline TiO2 Electrolyte Interfaces: Influence of Surface Electric Fields and Lewis-Acidic Cations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2017.