journal article·2019-02-06Open access

Unraveling the Interfacial Structure–Performance Correlation of Flexible Metal–Organic Framework Membranes on Polymeric Substrates

Jingwei Hou, Putu D. Sutrisna, Tiesheng Wang, Song Gao, Qi Li, Chao Zhou, Shijing Sun, Hao-Cheng Yang, Fengxia Wei, Michael T. Ruggiero, J. Axel Zeitler, Anthony K. Cheetham, Kang Liang, Vicki Chen

Abstract

Pure metal-organic framework (MOF) layers deposited on porous supports are important candidates for molecular sieving membranes, but their performance usually deviates from theoretical estimations. Here, we combine step-wise scanning electron microscopy imaging, time-resolved synchrotron X-ray scattering, terahertz infrared spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculation to investigate the ZIF-8 membrane formation on two types (polydopamine and TiO2) of functionalized porous supports. Though molecular sieving of ZIF-8 membranes for smaller gases (He, H2, and CO2) can be achieved with both types of functionalized supports, we unravel that the strong interaction between MOF and polydopamine can disrupt the formation of "perfect" MOF crystals at the interface, leading to a "contracted" MOF structure with partially uncoordinated imidazolate ligands. This further affects the low-frequency dynamical parameters of the framework and inhibits the effective seeded growth. Eventually, it leads to an unexpected loss of selectivity for the bulkier gases (N2 and CH4) for ZIF-8 on polydopamine-functionalized supports. This work links the dynamical aspects of MOFs with their gas transport behavior and highlights the importance of regulating the interfacial weak forces to preserve the ideal molecular sieving efficiency of MOF membranes, which also provides guidance for defect engineering of MOF film fabrication for sensing and electronic devices beyond membranes.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Extraction and Separation Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, Massachusetts, United States

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China

Department of Chemistry, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405, United States

School of Chemical Engineering, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia

Funding

Australian Research Council · Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government · China Scholarship Council · University of New South Wales

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.7810.1038/natrevmats.2016.78 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.00810.1016/j.joule.2017.08.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.12.00210.1016/j.chempr.2016.12.002 ↗
4. 10.1039/c4cs00096j10.1039/c4cs00096j ↗
5. 10.1039/c7cs00122c10.1039/c7cs00122c ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat450910.1038/nmat4509 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.5b0227610.1021/jacs.5b02276 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20151134010.1002/anie.201511340 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20160732910.1002/anie.201607329 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.06510.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.065 ↗
11. 10.1039/c4cc06699e10.1039/c4cc06699e ↗
12. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.9410.1038/nenergy.2016.94 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0990710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09907 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20160158910.1002/anie.201601589 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20180149510.1002/adma.201801495 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0152610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01526 ↗
17. 10.1039/c6mh00230g10.1039/c6mh00230g ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0428710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04287 ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.6b0737410.1021/jacs.6b07374 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aal245610.1126/science.aal2456 ↗
21. 10.1021/jz402019d10.1021/jz402019d ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.100320510710.1073/pnas.1003205107 ↗
23. 10.1103/physrevlett.113.21550210.1103/physrevlett.113.215502 ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.060243910310.1073/pnas.0602439103 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20161192710.1002/anie.201611927 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.04810.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.048 ↗
27. 10.1002/wcms.136010.1002/wcms.1360 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x ↗
29. 10.1080/0026897740010017110.1080/00268977400100171 ↗
30. 10.1107/s010876810200389010.1107/s0108768102003890 ↗
31. 10.1103/physrevb.65.03540610.1103/physrevb.65.035406 ↗
32. 10.1021/ja508360210.1021/ja5083602 ↗
33. 10.1021/ja408056210.1021/ja4080562 ↗
34. 10.1039/c4cc09281c10.1039/c4cc09281c ↗
35. 10.1039/c4ta00299g10.1039/c4ta00299g ↗
36. 10.1039/c4ta06763k10.1039/c4ta06763k ↗
37. 10.1021/jz300855a10.1021/jz300855a ↗
38. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.03010.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 ↗
39. 10.1039/c6mh00053c10.1039/c6mh00053c ↗
40. 10.1063/1.490481810.1063/1.4904818 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.7b0549710.1021/acsami.7b05497 ↗
42. 10.1039/c3cc44342f10.1039/c3cc44342f ↗
43. 10.1038/nchem.269110.1038/nchem.2691 ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20110207110.1002/anie.201102071 ↗
45. 10.1021/cm103571y10.1021/cm103571y ↗
46. 10.1002/adfm.20170532710.1002/adfm.201705327 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja109268m10.1021/ja109268m ↗
48. 10.1021/cm200555s10.1021/cm200555s ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20090117710.1002/anie.200901177 ↗
50. 10.1021/ci900009f10.1021/ci900009f ↗
51. 10.1038/srep0291410.1038/srep02914 ↗
52. 10.1002/anie.20141154010.1002/anie.201411540 ↗
53. 10.1039/c0cs00147c10.1039/c0cs00147c ↗
54. 10.1021/cr200077m10.1021/cr200077m ↗
55. 10.1126/science.118476910.1126/science.1184769 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.00610.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.006 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0483310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04833 ↗
58. 10.1002/cphc.20170046310.1002/cphc.201700463 ↗
59. 10.1021/jp103212z10.1021/jp103212z ↗
60. 10.1038/nchem.44410.1038/nchem.444 ↗
61. 10.1002/anie.20050377810.1002/anie.200503778 ↗
62. 10.1038/nmat485210.1038/nmat4852 ↗
63. 10.1038/s41467-017-00544-110.1038/s41467-017-00544-1 ↗
64. 10.1002/adfm.20160155010.1002/adfm.201601550 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.03.01310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.03.013 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.08.05710.1016/j.powtec.2016.08.057 ↗