In Situ Characterization of the Triphase Contact Line in a Brush-Coating Process: Toward the Enhanced Efficiency of Polymer Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Solution processes have been widely used for making polymer films in organic photoelectric devices but suffer from difficulties in controlling the film formation. Here, by in situ characterization triphase contact lines (TCLs) in a brush-coating process, we clarify how TCLs affect the quality of as-prepared films. By fine-tuning the dewetting of a binary polymer solution (P3HT:PCBM) via different directions, TCLs with different patterns lead to films with different morphologies. High-quality nanothin films with larger crystallized sizes and higher orientations were enabled when TCLs were parallel to the brush edge, based on which the polymer solar cell shows higher power conversion efficiency (2.665%) compared with that of the spin-coated film.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Bio-inspired Smart Interfacial Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry, Beihang University, No. 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, P. R. China
Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Section 2, Academia Road, Nangang District, Taipei City 115, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat365010.1038/nmat3650 ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20140122910.1002/aenm.201401229 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20130626610.1002/adma.201306266 ↗
4. 10.1039/C6CC05522B10.1039/C6CC05522B ↗
5. 10.1039/C4SC01068J10.1039/C4SC01068J ↗
6. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.02510.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.025 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20170326810.1002/adfm.201703268 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20170241410.1002/adma.201702414 ↗
9. 10.1021/am100505e10.1021/am100505e ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20070204010.1002/adma.200702040 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20130113810.1002/adma.201301138 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.116219310.1126/science.1162193 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20130508410.1002/adma.201305084 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20040031510.1002/adfm.200400315 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20070228510.1002/adma.200702285 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms1237410.1038/ncomms12374 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20140086510.1002/adma.201400865 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20160698710.1002/adma.201606987 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20170693810.1002/adma.201706938 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.8b0294810.1021/jacs.8b02948 ↗
21. 10.1039/C6RA17590B10.1039/C6RA17590B ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20160226910.1002/aenm.201602269 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.02710.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.027 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.5b0934910.1021/acsami.5b09349 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.007 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20100257310.1002/adfm.201002573 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.04110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.041 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.7b0160610.1021/jacs.7b01606 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20180138710.1002/aenm.201801387 ↗
30. 10.1002/polb.2306310.1002/polb.23063 ↗