journal article·2018-11-21

In Situ Characterization of the Triphase Contact Line in a Brush-Coating Process: Toward the Enhanced Efficiency of Polymer Solar Cells

Cheng Guo, Xiaoyu Gao, Fang-Ju Lin, Qianbin Wang, Lili Meng, Ruixin Bian, Yanming Sun, Lei Jiang, Huan Liu

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 46
Publisher page

Abstract

Solution processes have been widely used for making polymer films in organic photoelectric devices but suffer from difficulties in controlling the film formation. Here, by in situ characterization triphase contact lines (TCLs) in a brush-coating process, we clarify how TCLs affect the quality of as-prepared films. By fine-tuning the dewetting of a binary polymer solution (P3HT:PCBM) via different directions, TCLs with different patterns lead to films with different morphologies. High-quality nanothin films with larger crystallized sizes and higher orientations were enabled when TCLs were parallel to the brush edge, based on which the polymer solar cell shows higher power conversion efficiency (2.665%) compared with that of the spin-coated film.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Bio-inspired Smart Interfacial Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry, Beihang University, No. 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, P. R. China

Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Section 2, Academia Road, Nangang District, Taipei City 115, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat365010.1038/nmat3650 ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20140122910.1002/aenm.201401229 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20130626610.1002/adma.201306266 ↗
4. 10.1039/C6CC05522B10.1039/C6CC05522B ↗
5. 10.1039/C4SC01068J10.1039/C4SC01068J ↗
6. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.02510.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.025 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20170326810.1002/adfm.201703268 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20170241410.1002/adma.201702414 ↗
9. 10.1021/am100505e10.1021/am100505e ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20070204010.1002/adma.200702040 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20130113810.1002/adma.201301138 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.116219310.1126/science.1162193 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20130508410.1002/adma.201305084 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20040031510.1002/adfm.200400315 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20070228510.1002/adma.200702285 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms1237410.1038/ncomms12374 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20140086510.1002/adma.201400865 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20160698710.1002/adma.201606987 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20170693810.1002/adma.201706938 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.8b0294810.1021/jacs.8b02948 ↗
21. 10.1039/C6RA17590B10.1039/C6RA17590B ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20160226910.1002/aenm.201602269 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.02710.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.027 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.5b0934910.1021/acsami.5b09349 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.007 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20100257310.1002/adfm.201002573 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.04110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.041 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.7b0160610.1021/jacs.7b01606 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20180138710.1002/aenm.201801387 ↗
30. 10.1002/polb.2306310.1002/polb.23063 ↗