On the Better Understanding of the Surprisingly High Performance of Metal−Organic Framework-Based Mixed-Matrix Membranes Using the Example of UiO-66 and Matrimid
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks feature a certain framework flexibility, mainly due to a linker mobility inside the lattice. The latter is responsible for effects like breathing or gate-opening, thus making predictions of the sorption and diffusion behavior quite difficult. Permeation measurements on supported UiO-66 membranes at low temperatures and on polymer-coated UiO-66 membrane layers as well as 2 H NMR line shape studies and nitrogen sorption measurements of UiO-66 with deuterated linkers in Matrimid as mixed-matrix membranes (MMM) indicate that the 2-site 180° flips (π-flips) of the aromatic ring are hindered by the presence of (i) the surrounding polymer Matrimid and (ii) residual solvent molecules, thus giving profound insights into the molecular understanding of gas transport through metal–organic framework-based MMMs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 3A, 30167 Hannover, Germany
Funding
FP7 Energy
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.02210.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.022 ↗
2. 10.1039/C7CE00655A10.1039/C7CE00655A ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0068110.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00681 ↗
4. 10.1039/C7CC03345A10.1039/C7CC03345A ↗
5. Li J. · Chem. Commun. · 2017
6. 10.1039/C7CC03409A10.1039/C7CC03409A ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.6b0450110.1021/jacs.6b04501 ↗
8. 10.1039/C6TA07145G10.1039/C6TA07145G ↗
9. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.04.00910.1016/j.micromeso.2017.04.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.07910.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.079 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b0334710.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03347 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.14010.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.140 ↗
13. 10.1039/C7CS00033B10.1039/C7CS00033B ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.00810.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.008 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.7b0145110.1021/jacs.7b01451 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7CC03673F10.1039/C7CC03673F ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0014710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00147 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0045710.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00457 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.03910.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.039 ↗
20. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.8610.1038/nenergy.2017.86 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.01510.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.015 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0140510.1021/acs.cgd.6b01405 ↗
23. 10.1002/cssc.20160120310.1002/cssc.201601203 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.04110.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.041 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20170110910.1002/anie.201701109 ↗
26. 10.1039/C4CS00437J10.1039/C4CS00437J ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0171810.1021/acs.macromol.7b01718 ↗
28. 10.1039/C6QI00042H10.1039/C6QI00042H ↗
29. 10.1080/15422119.2016.114614910.1080/15422119.2016.1146149 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.05110.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.051 ↗
31. 10.1080/01496395.2015.104660510.1080/01496395.2015.1046605 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.01010.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.010 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.00310.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.003 ↗
34. 10.1080/15422119.2016.114614910.1080/15422119.2016.1146149 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp302919310.1021/jp3029193 ↗
36. 10.1021/cm300863c10.1021/cm300863c ↗
37. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.06910.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.069 ↗
38. 10.1039/C7CC03887A10.1039/C7CC03887A ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.7b0210510.1021/acsami.7b02105 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.02210.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.022 ↗
41. 10.1039/f1988840234710.1039/f19888402347 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0325910.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03259 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp202633t10.1021/jp202633t ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0943510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09435 ↗