Isostructural MOFs with Higher Proton Conductivity for Improved Oxygen Evolution Reaction Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Here we synthesized two new isostructural MOFs (FJU-82-Co/FJU-82-Zn) and first observed that tuning of the proton conductivity may provide an effective strategy to improve the electrocatalytic OER perfomances of isostructural crystalline MOF materials. The conductivity value for FJU-82-Co is 7.40 × 10–5 S cm–1, which is 127-fold that for FJU-82-Zn with 5.80 × 10–7 S cm–1 at 60 °C and 98% RH, while the overpotential of FJU-82-Co is 0.57 V at 1 mA cm–2, which is better than that of FJU-82-Zn with 1.17 V.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Fujian Normal University, 32 Shangsan Road, Fuzhou 350007, P. R. China
State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, P. R. China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C9EE01722D10.1039/C9EE01722D ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20180288010.1002/adma.201802880 ↗
3. 10.1002/advs.20170069110.1002/advs.201700691 ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20180366610.1002/smll.201803666 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20180757110.1002/anie.201807571 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11802310.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118023 ↗
7. 10.1039/c2ee22554a10.1039/c2ee22554a ↗
8. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0078510.1021/acsaem.8b00785 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.9b0285910.1021/acsami.9b02859 ↗
10. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0117010.1021/acscatal.6b01170 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.03110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.031 ↗
12. 10.1002/chem.20190348210.1002/chem.201903482 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20161041310.1002/anie.201610413 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20180510310.1002/smll.201805103 ↗
15. 10.1002/celc.20170039210.1002/celc.201700392 ↗
16. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0508910.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05089 ↗
17. 10.1039/C5EE03453A10.1039/C5EE03453A ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.01010.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.010 ↗
19. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0441510.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04415 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20170387010.1002/adma.201703870 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.00410.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.004 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0179410.1021/acsaem.8b01794 ↗
23. 10.1002/smtd.20190023410.1002/smtd.201900234 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11801710.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118017 ↗
25. 10.1039/C6TA07939C10.1039/C6TA07939C ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.7b0916310.1021/jacs.7b09163 ↗
27. 10.1002/cplu.20180039210.1002/cplu.201800392 ↗
28. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw451510.1126/sciadv.aaw4515 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6EE01886F10.1039/C6EE01886F ↗
30. 10.1039/C9CC06607A10.1039/C9CC06607A ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-019-13051-210.1038/s41467-019-13051-2 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20170204810.1002/aenm.201702048 ↗
33. 10.1002/eem2.1202410.1002/eem2.12024 ↗
34. 10.1021/jacs.6b1235310.1021/jacs.6b12353 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.00810.1016/j.joule.2017.08.008 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.6b0312510.1021/jacs.6b03125 ↗
37. 10.1039/C7TA01447C10.1039/C7TA01447C ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.06.01810.1016/j.jcat.2018.06.018 ↗
39. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0015310.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00153 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20160514810.1002/adma.201605148 ↗
41. 10.1039/c3ee41438h10.1039/c3ee41438h ↗
42. 10.1039/C9TA02169H10.1039/C9TA02169H ↗
43. 10.1021/ja511389q10.1021/ja511389q ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0268610.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02686 ↗
45. 10.1021/ar300291s10.1021/ar300291s ↗
46. 10.1021/ja402727d10.1021/ja402727d ↗
47. 10.1021/cg401529u10.1021/cg401529u ↗
48. 10.1002/anie.20100062910.1002/anie.201000629 ↗
49. 10.1039/C6CS00250A10.1039/C6CS00250A ↗
50. 10.1002/ange.20180757110.1002/ange.201807571 ↗
51. 10.1039/C7TA03340K10.1039/C7TA03340K ↗
52. 10.1021/ja901731z10.1021/ja901731z ↗