journal article·2016-06-15

Improving Performance of Organic-Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells Based on Textured Surface via Acid Processing

Xiaowan Dai, Tao Chen, Hongkun Cai, Hongbin Wen, Yun Sun

Publisher page

Abstract

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) ( PEDOT: PSS) is widely applied in organic-photoelectronic devices due to its excellent transparency and conductivity. However, when it is used in the organic-silicon heterojunction solar cells with traditional pyramid texturing surface, the device performance is limited by the contact between the PEDOT: PSS and silicon wafer at the bottom of the pyramids. We optimized the structure of the bottom of the pyramids via acid isotropic etching (AIE) method with mixed acid solution to ensure that the silicon wafer is fully covered by the PEDOT: PSS. In addition, hydrogenated amorphous silicon thin films were deposited with PEVCD method as the passivation and back surface field (BSF) layer to decrease the rear surface recombination rate, thus increasing the long wavelength response. Finally, a power conversion efficiency of 13.78% was achieved after depositing MoO3 on the front of the device as the antireflection layer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Photo-electronic Thin Film Devices and Technology and ‡Department of Electronic Science and Engineering, College of Electronic Information and Optical Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, China, 300071

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Hebei Province

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.228273710.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2282737 ↗
2. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.235215110.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2352151 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl401540h10.1021/nl401540h ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20110271210.1002/adma.201102712 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp308349f10.1021/jp308349f ↗
6. 10.1021/am508879b10.1021/am508879b ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20140207610.1002/adma.201402076 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20140038010.1002/adfm.201400380 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0243210.1021/acsnano.5b02432 ↗
10. 10.1021/nn403982b10.1021/nn403982b ↗
11. 10.1021/am503949g10.1021/am503949g ↗
12. 10.1063/1.482211610.1063/1.4822116 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20110209510.1002/smll.201102095 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.473424010.1063/1.4734240 ↗
15. 10.1002/pip.467003030310.1002/pip.4670030303 ↗
16. 10.1515/green-2011-003910.1515/green-2011-0039 ↗
17. 10.1021/nn504279d10.1021/nn504279d ↗
18. 10.1039/C4EE02282C10.1039/C4EE02282C ↗
19. 10.1063/1.368487210.1063/1.3684872 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20130092310.1002/aenm.201300923 ↗
21. 10.1039/c3ta14590e10.1039/c3ta14590e ↗
22. Gloeckler M. · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2003 · 763
23. 10.1002/aenm.20150074410.1002/aenm.201500744 ↗
24. 10.1021/nl404389u10.1021/nl404389u ↗
25. 10.1063/1.490346710.1063/1.4903467 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20120099310.1002/adfm.201200993 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.08.02810.1016/j.solmat.2015.08.028 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.486888010.1063/1.4868880 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.06510.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.065 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0573210.1021/acsnano.5b05732 ↗