journal article·2019-02-13

Improving Oxygen Reduction Performance by Using Protic Poly(Ionic Liquid) as Proton Conductors

Xiaocong Yan, Fangfang Zhang, Haining Zhang, Haolin Tang, Mu Pan, Pengfei Fang

Publisher page

Abstract

Improving catalytic performance of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) of Pt/C catalysts is essential for reducing Pt-loading and the according cost of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Herein, we report a new conceptual design of catalyst layers to improve the ORR performance of Pt/C catalysts by replacing perfluorosulfonated ionomers with protic poly(ionic liquid) as a proton conductor. The specific activity of the designed catalyst at 0.9 V under acidic conditions is over three times higher than that of catalyst using Nafion as the proton conductor. Furthermore, the durability test reveals that the introduction of protic poly(ionic liquid) ionomers can protect Pt nanoparticles against aggregation during potential cycles, but it is less durable than Nafion because of the nature of hydrocarbons. Nevertheless, we believe that replacing perfluorosulfonated ionomers with protic poly(ionic liquid) as proton conductors could be a promising strategy to design an efficient cathode for low Pt-loading PEMFCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Nr. 122 Luoshi Rd., Wuhan 430070, China

College of Physics and Science Technology, Wuhan University, Luojiashan Rd., Wuhan 430072, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Hubei Province

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.04410.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.044 ↗
2. 10.1038/3510462010.1038/35104620 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.01210.1016/j.rser.2014.01.012 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature1147510.1038/nature11475 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.059 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0064410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00644 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20120718610.1002/anie.201207186 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0038510.1021/acsenergylett.7b00385 ↗
9. 10.1038/ncomms622910.1038/ncomms6229 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.03110.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.031 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.1301706jes10.1149/2.1301706jes ↗
12. 10.1149/2.0071806jes10.1149/2.0071806jes ↗
13. 10.1039/c0ee00638f10.1039/c0ee00638f ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0021610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
15. 10.1149/2.1071713jes10.1149/2.1071713jes ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.047 ↗
17. 10.1021/cr400374x10.1021/cr400374x ↗
18. 10.1021/cr068040u10.1021/cr068040u ↗
19. 10.1039/b822992a10.1039/b822992a ↗
20. 10.1021/am507400310.1021/am5074003 ↗
21. 10.1038/nmat287810.1038/nmat2878 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.07610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.076 ↗
23. 10.1039/c6cs00620e10.1039/c6cs00620e ↗
24. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.04.002 ↗
25. 10.1021/cr020712310.1021/cr0207123 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.0551512jes10.1149/2.0551512jes ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20150833810.1002/anie.201508338 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20100406410.1002/adma.201004064 ↗
29. 10.1126/science.113594110.1126/science.1135941 ↗
30. 10.1002/celc.20130011110.1002/celc.201300111 ↗
31. 10.1016/s0378-7753(98)00186-410.1016/s0378-7753(98)00186-4 ↗
32. 10.1016/s0013-4686(00)00679-410.1016/s0013-4686(00)00679-4 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.06010.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.060 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.06710.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.067 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.22910.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.229 ↗
36. 10.1149/05002.1495ecst10.1149/05002.1495ecst ↗
37. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.14310.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.143 ↗