journal article·2016-06-01

Stabilization of Natural Antioxidants by Silk Biomaterials

Tingting Luo, Lei Yang, Jianbing Wu, Zhaozhu Zheng, Gang Li, Xiaoqin Wang, David L. Kaplan

Publisher page

Abstract

The stabilities of three natural antioxidants, vitamin C (VC), (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and curcumin, in silk films were examined and mechanisms of stabilization were elucidated. The antioxidants were physically incorporated into three types of silk films: as-cast, dried from hydrogels, and methanol-treated. Films were stored at 4, 37, and 45 °C for 30 days in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, along with controls consisting of free antioxidants. Incorporation of antioxidants did not significantly change film morphology or secondary structure. When stored at 4 °C, all samples showed similar antioxidant activities (percent scavenging) at different time points, determined by the colorimetric 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. At higher temperatures, VC in the as-cast film, EGCG in the as-cast and dried hydrogel films, and curcumin in the methanol-treated films retained more than 50% scavenging activity after 14 days of storage, significantly higher than the other samples. Interaction between antioxidants and silk, as well as degradation of the antioxidants, was investigated by fast-performance liquid chromatography (FPLC) and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), with an aim of understanding the mechanisms of silk-based stabilization. Binding of antioxidant molecules to hydrophobic or to hydrophilic/hydrophilic boundary regions of silk, depending on the chemical properties of the antioxidant, may account for the observed stabilization effects. The data can help guide further engineering of antioxidant-functionalized silk biomaterials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States

Funding

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Suzhou City

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.00110.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00266-410.1016/S0891-5849(98)00266-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.11.01210.1016/j.bbamem.2003.11.012 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cca.2005.09.00210.1016/j.cca.2005.09.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1011-1344(97)00081-X10.1016/S1011-1344(97)00081-X ↗
6. 10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.02110.1016/j.fct.2012.09.021 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.aca.2007.01.07810.1016/j.aca.2007.01.078 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.01310.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.013 ↗
9. Fracalossi D. M. · J. Nutr. · 1998 · 128 · 174510.1093/jn/128.10.1745 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1745-4522.2000.tb00178.x10.1111/j.1745-4522.2000.tb00178.x ↗
11. 10.1111/j.0959-9673.2004.390ap.x10.1111/j.0959-9673.2004.390ap.x ↗
12. 10.1021/jf062276h10.1021/jf062276h ↗
13. 10.1096/fj.02-0881fje10.1096/fj.02-0881fje ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.00810.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.008 ↗
15. 10.1021/jf304116s10.1021/jf304116s ↗
16. 10.1080/0163558090328504910.1080/01635580903285049 ↗
17. 10.1021/mp700113r10.1021/mp700113r ↗
18. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.02510.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.025 ↗
19. 10.1016/0304-3835(95)03827-J10.1016/0304-3835(95)03827-J ↗
20. 10.1016/S0166-1280(02)00242-710.1016/S0166-1280(02)00242-7 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.12.00710.1016/j.lfs.2005.12.007 ↗
22. 10.1007/s12272-010-1010-y10.1007/s12272-010-1010-y ↗
23. 10.1007/s11064-007-9547-y10.1007/s11064-007-9547-y ↗
24. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1973.tb09131.x10.1111/j.2042-7158.1973.tb09131.x ↗
25. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00969.x10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00969.x ↗
26. 10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00019-310.1016/S0028-3908(01)00019-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.01810.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.018 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.05310.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.053 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.03110.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.031 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.00210.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.002 ↗
31. 10.1038/nprot.2011.37910.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.024 ↗
33. 10.1038/nmat274510.1038/nmat2745 ↗
34. 10.1002/mabi.20090025810.1002/mabi.200900258 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.02610.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.026 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.140774311110.1073/pnas.1407743111 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.00910.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.009 ↗
39. 10.1021/bm800956n10.1021/bm800956n ↗
40. 10.1002/mabi.20090038810.1002/mabi.200900388 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.00910.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.009 ↗
42. 10.1021/ma061010910.1021/ma0610109 ↗
43. 10.1021/bm200062a10.1021/bm200062a ↗
44. 10.1021/bm101422j10.1021/bm101422j ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.00910.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.009 ↗