Direct in Situ TEM Observation of Modification of Oxidation by the Injected Vacancies for Ni–4Al Alloy Using a Microfabricated Nanopost
Source abstract
Abstract
Vacancy injection and selective oxidation of one species in bimetallic alloy at high temperature is a well-known phenomenon. However, detailed understanding of the behavior of the injected vacancies and consequently their effect on oxidation remains elusive. The current research examines the oxidation of high-purity Ni doped with 4.1 at. % Al using in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Experiments are performed on nanoposts fabricated from solution-annealed bulk material that are essentially single crystal samples. Initial oxidation is observed to occur by multisite oxide nucleation, formation of an oxide shell followed by cavity nucleation and growth at the metal/oxide interface. One of the most interesting in situ TEM observations is the formation of a cavity that leads to the faceting of the metal and subsequent oxidation occurring by an atomic ledge migration mechanism on the faceted metal surface. Further, it is directly observed that metal atoms diffuse through the oxide layer to combine with oxygen at the outer surface of the oxide. The present work indicates that injection of vacancies and formation of cavity will lead to a situation where the oxidation rate is essentially controlled by the low surface energy plane of the metal, rather than by the initial terminating plane at the metal surface exposed to the oxidizing environment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory and ‡Energy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.micron.2012.02.00710.1016/j.micron.2012.02.007 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.24610110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.246101 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0066502010.1007/BF00665020 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.142069011210.1073/pnas.1420690112 ↗
5. Fromm E. · 199810.1007/978-3-642-60311-2 ↗
6. 10.1021/nn901736y10.1021/nn901736y ↗
7. 10.1088/0034-4885/12/1/30810.1088/0034-4885/12/1/308 ↗
8. 10.1002/cctc.20100023810.1002/cctc.201000238 ↗
9. Smigellkas A. D. · Trans. AIME · 1947 · 171 · 130
10. 10.1126/science.109656610.1126/science.1096566 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.213089010.1063/1.2130890 ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20070038210.1002/smll.200700382 ↗
13. 10.1080/1478643070181920310.1080/14786430701819203 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl070026p10.1021/nl070026p ↗
15. 10.1038/srep0368310.1038/srep03683 ↗
16. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/25/25560310.1088/0957-4484/18/25/255603 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.03810.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.038 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature0416510.1038/nature04165 ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0066423110.1007/BF00664231 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11661-014-2629-y10.1007/s11661-014-2629-y ↗
21. 10.1149/1.242650210.1149/1.2426502 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.micron.2012.04.00710.1016/j.micron.2012.04.007 ↗
23. Jinschek J. R. · Microsc. Analy. · 2012 · 2012 · 5
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.06.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.06.008 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗
26. 10.1166/jnn.2011.496410.1166/jnn.2011.4964 ↗
27. 10.1103/RevModPhys.57.43710.1103/RevModPhys.57.437 ↗
28. 10.1088/0034-4885/50/7/00210.1088/0034-4885/50/7/002 ↗