journal article·2014-05-14

Pulsed-Laser Deposition of Nanostructured Iron Oxide Catalysts for Efficient Water Oxidation

Michele Orlandi, Stefano Caramori, Federico Ronconi, Carlo A. Bignozzi, Zakaria El Koura, Nicola Bazzanella, Laura Meda, Antonio Miotello

Publisher page

Abstract

Amorphous iron oxide nanoparticles were synthesized by pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) for functionalization of indium-tin oxide surfaces, resulting in electrodes capable of efficient catalysis in water oxidation. These electrodes, based on earth-abundant and nonhazardous iron metal, are able to sustain high current densities (up to 20 mA/cm2) at reasonably low applied potential (1.64 V at pH 11.8 vs reversible hydrogen electrode) for more than 1 h when employed as anodes for electrochemical water oxidation. The good catalytic performance proves the validity of PLD as a method to prepare nanostructured solid-state materials for catalysis, enabling control over critical properties such as surface coverage and morphology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Iron oxide chemistry and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Trento, I-38123 Povo (Trento), Italy

Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 17-19, 44100 Ferrara, Italy

Istituto ENI Donegani per le Energie Non Convenzionali, Via Fauser 4, 28100 Novara, Italy

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Eisenberg R. · Inorg. Chem. · 2005 · 44 · 679910.1021/ic058006i ↗
2. Rajeshwar K. · 2008 · 110.1007/978-0-387-72810-0 ↗
3. Ruttinger W. · Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 97 · 110.1021/cr950201z ↗
4. Lewis N. S. · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 58910.1038/414589a ↗
5. Gondal M. A. · Appl. Catal. A · 2004 · 268 · 15910.1016/j.apcata.2004.03.030 ↗
6. Balu A. M. · Chem. Commun. · 2010 · 46 · 782510.1039/c0cc02015j ↗
7. Smith R. D. L. · Science · 2013 · 340 · 6010.1126/science.1233638 ↗
8. Cristino V. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 1308310.1039/c3cp52237g ↗
9. Zotti G. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 145 · 38510.1149/1.1838273 ↗
10. Schrebler R. · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2006 · 9 · C11010.1149/1.2200141 ↗
11. Warang T. · Appl. Catal. A · 2012 · 423 · 2110.1016/j.apcata.2012.02.037 ↗
12. Shaheen M. E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 083110-110.1063/1.4819804 ↗
13. Guo Q. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2013 · 552 · 110.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.088 ↗
14. Gower M. C. · Opt. Express · 2000 · 7 · 5610.1364/OE.7.000056 ↗
15. Kanan M. W. · Science · 2008 · 321 · 107210.1126/science.1162018 ↗
16. Lutterman D. A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 383810.1021/ja900023k ↗
17. van de Krol, R.InPhotoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production;van de Krol, R.; Grätzel, M., Eds.Springer:New York, 2012; Chapter 3, p75.10.1007/978-1-4614-1380-6 ↗
18. 10.1002/cphc.20130114310.1002/cphc.201301143 ↗
19. Klahr B. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 762610.1039/c2ee21414h ↗