Influence of the Guest on Aggregation of the Host by Exciton–Polaron Interactions and Its Effects on the Stability of Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
The root causes of the differences in electroluminescence stability among phosphorescent organic light-emitting devices (PHOLEDs) utilizing different emitter guests are studied. The results show that the host material plays a more influential role in limiting device stability in comparison to the guest. During the operation of a PHOLED, the host undergoes aggregation as a result of interactions between the excitons and positive polarons. The rate of this aggregation is found to be the limiting factor for device lifetime and is influenced by the choice of the guest material and its concentration. Finally, it is shown that phase segregation between the host and the guest is an important aspect of the aggregation process. As a result of this segregation, energy transfer from the host to the guest becomes increasingly less efficient, resulting in the observed gradual loss in electroluminescence efficiency in the devices over time. The findings explain why PHOLEDs utilizing different guest materials but otherwise identical material systems can have significantly different lifetimes and provide an answer to a long-lasting question in the field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering & Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.9879910.1063/1.98799 ↗
2. 10.1038/2595410.1038/25954 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.140958210.1063/1.1409582 ↗
4. Wu, S.; Huh, B.; Yu, T.; Hayase, H.OLED Display Market Trackerhttps://technology.ihs.com/553125/oled-display-market-tracker-q4-2015(accessed Jan 11, 2016) .
5. 10.1063/1.288453010.1063/1.2884530 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.315168910.1063/1.3151689 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.243092210.1063/1.2430922 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.300689010.1063/1.3006890 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20070081610.1002/adfm.200700816 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.07.01710.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.07.017 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20090262410.1002/adma.200902624 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.474519410.1063/1.4745194 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.06.02110.1016/j.orgel.2013.06.021 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.481791810.1063/1.4817918 ↗
15. 10.1021/am402537j10.1021/am402537j ↗
16. 10.1021/am404589m10.1021/am404589m ↗
17. 10.1063/1.475225210.1063/1.4752252 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20130384010.1002/adfm.201303840 ↗
19. 10.1002/adom.20140064010.1002/adom.201400640 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja003693s10.1021/ja003693s ↗
21. 10.1002/marc.20090030910.1002/marc.200900309 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20060082210.1002/adma.200600822 ↗
23. Barltrop, J. A.; Coyle, J. D.Principles of Photochemistry,1st ed.Wiley:Chichester, England, 1978; pp7–8.
24. 10.1039/c2jm14151e10.1039/c2jm14151e ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20100312810.1002/adma.201003128 ↗
26. 10.1021/cm703682q10.1021/cm703682q ↗
27. 10.1063/1.481126710.1063/1.4811267 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00339-014-8746-z10.1007/s00339-014-8746-z ↗