journal article·2019-11-13

Fabrication of Robust Antibacterial Coatings Based on an Organic–Inorganic Hybrid System

Qiuli Cheng, Xiaowei Guo, Xiaojuan Hao, Zuosen Shi, Song Zhu, Zhanchen Cui

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 45
Publisher page

Abstract

Antibacterial coatings have drawn much attention because of their high potential applications in medicine. However, the weak mechanical property, poor biosafety, and biocompatibility of most established antibacterial coatings restrict their applications. In this study, robust antibacterial coatings were fabricated via a simple organic–inorganic hybrid method. The polymer component provides an excellent antibacterial property to the coatings, and the hybrid silica sol improves the hardness of coatings. After cross-linking, network-structured coatings were formed. The coating surfaces exhibited high transmittance, excellent mechanical property, and good antibacterial effect against Escherichia coli (Gram-negative) and Streptococcus mutans (Gram-positive). Additionally, the robust coatings were noncytotoxic with satisfactory biocompatibility. Such results provide a theoretical basis for their applications in the biomedical field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial agents and applications · Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CSIRO Manufacturing, Clayton 3168, Australia

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adhm.20180035410.1002/adhm.201800354 ↗
2. 10.1002/adhm.20140041810.1002/adhm.201400418 ↗
3. 10.1039/c6ra07678e10.1039/c6ra07678e ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0013510.1021/acs.biomac.8b00135 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.03410.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.034 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20180214010.1002/adfm.201802140 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62005-310.1016/s0140-6736(10)62005-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.01310.1016/j.mib.2013.06.013 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02738.x10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02738.x ↗
11. 10.1039/c5md00344j10.1039/c5md00344j ↗
12. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-910.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.drup.2011.01.00110.1016/j.drup.2011.01.001 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0066710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00667 ↗
15. 10.1002/adhm.20187005010.1002/adhm.201870050 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.01110.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.011 ↗
17. 10.1002/admi.20150052110.1002/admi.201500521 ↗
18. 10.1039/c7tb01178d10.1039/c7tb01178d ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0101610.1021/acs.biomac.7b01016 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0030910.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00309 ↗
21. 10.3390/molecules2205081310.3390/molecules22050813 ↗
22. 10.1039/b509097k10.1039/b509097k ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0104610.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01046 ↗
24. 10.1021/la301872q10.1021/la301872q ↗
25. 10.1021/cm900970p10.1021/cm900970p ↗
26. 10.1039/c2ta00142j10.1039/c2ta00142j ↗
27. 10.1016/s0022-3093(01)00818-310.1016/s0022-3093(01)00818-3 ↗
28. 10.1515/corrrev.2006.24.5-6.28110.1515/corrrev.2006.24.5-6.281 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.10510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.105 ↗
30. 10.14478/ace.2017.108110.14478/ace.2017.1081 ↗
31. 10.1021/cm960114310.1021/cm9601143 ↗
32. 10.1002/ffj.313810.1002/ffj.3138 ↗
33. 10.1021/am505481q10.1021/am505481q ↗
34. 10.1126/science.aaa094610.1126/science.aaa0946 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.07710.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.077 ↗
36. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0295710.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02957 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.12365910.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123659 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.05410.1016/j.msec.2017.04.054 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.6b1049810.1021/acsami.6b10498 ↗
40. 10.1021/jf305472t10.1021/jf305472t ↗
41. 10.1039/c1cs15209b10.1039/c1cs15209b ↗
42. 10.1039/c0sm00151a10.1039/c0sm00151a ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.07810.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.078 ↗