journal article·2019-04-17Open access

Capillary-Fiber Based Electrophoretic Delivery Device

David J. Poxson, Erik O. Gabrielsson, Alberto Bonisoli, Ulrika Linderhed, Tobias Abrahamsson, Isabelle Matthiesen, Klas Tybrandt, Magnus Berggren, Daniel T. Simon

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 15

Abstract

Organic electronic ion pumps (OEIPs) are versatile tools for electrophoretic delivery of substances with high spatiotemporal resolution. To date, OEIPs and similar iontronic components have been fabricated using thin-film techniques and often rely on laborious, multistep photolithographic processes. OEIPs have been demonstrated in a variety of in vitro and in vivo settings for controlling biological systems, but the thin-film form factor and limited repertoire of polyelectrolyte materials and device fabrication techniques unnecessarily constrain the possibilities for miniaturization and extremely localized substance delivery, e.g., the greater range of pharmaceutical compounds, on the scale of a single cell. Here, we demonstrate an entirely new OEIP form factor based on capillary fibers that include hyperbranched polyglycerols (dPGs) as the selective electrophoretic membrane. The dPGs enable electrophoretic channels with a high concentration of fixed charges and well-controlled cross-linking and can be realized using a simple "one-pot" fluidic manufacturing protocol. Selective electrophoretic transport of cations and anions of various sizes is demonstrated, including "large" substances that are difficult to transport with other OEIP technologies. We present a method for tailoring and characterizing the electrophoretic channels' fixed charge concentration in the operational state. Subsequently, we compare the experimental performance of these capillary OEIPs to a computational model and explain unexpected features in the ionic current for the transport and delivery of larger, lower-mobility ionic compounds. From this model, we are able to elucidate several operational and design principles relevant to miniaturized electrophoretic drug delivery technologies in general. Overall, the compactness of the capillary OEIP enables electrophoretic delivery devices with probelike geometries, suitable for a variety of ionic compounds, paving the way for less-invasive implantation into biological systems and for healthcare applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, 601 74 Norrköping, Sweden

Center for Micro-BioRobotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 56025 Pontedera, Italy

BioRobotics Institute, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56025 Pontedera, Italy

Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden

Department of Printed Electronics, RISE Acreo, Research Institutes of Sweden, SE-601 17 Norrköping, Sweden

Funding

Stiftelsen f?r?Strategisk Forskning · Link?pings Universitet · Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse · ?nnesj? Foundation

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20070041910.1002/adma.200700419 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0014610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00146 ↗
3. 10.1021/cm402200310.1021/cm4022003 ↗
4. 10.1021/la020026z10.1021/la020026z ↗
5. 10.1007/s00216-011-5363-y10.1007/s00216-011-5363-y ↗
6. 10.1021/ac053475n10.1021/ac053475n ↗
7. 10.1021/cm020312w10.1021/cm020312w ↗
8. 10.1021/la802833710.1021/la8028337 ↗
9. 10.1038/am.2017.1610.1038/am.2017.16 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.290.5496.154010.1126/science.290.5496.1540 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat196310.1038/nmat1963 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20090018710.1002/adma.200900187 ↗
13. 10.1126/sciadv.150003910.1126/sciadv.1500039 ↗
14. 10.1126/sciadv.aau129110.1126/sciadv.aau1291 ↗
15. 10.1126/sciadv.160134010.1126/sciadv.1601340 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmat249410.1038/nmat2494 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.161775811410.1073/pnas.1617758114 ↗
18. 10.1117/1.JBO.19.8.08090210.1117/1.JBO.19.8.080902 ↗
19. 10.1021/ac990090u10.1021/ac990090u ↗
20. 10.1021/ac990090u10.1021/ac990090u ↗
21. 10.1161/01.CIR.75.4.77810.1161/01.CIR.75.4.778 ↗
22. 10.1002/admt.20170036010.1002/admt.201700360 ↗
24. 10.1038/ncomms186910.1038/ncomms1869 ↗
25. 10.1002/elps.20180009310.1002/elps.201800093 ↗
26. 10.1039/C4LC00024B10.1039/C4LC00024B ↗
27. 10.1021/ac101297t10.1021/ac101297t ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20090004510.1002/anie.200900045 ↗
29. Cornet N. · J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst. · 1999 · 3 · 33
30. 10.1039/C5SM00573F10.1039/C5SM00573F ↗
31. 10.1039/C7SM01732D10.1039/C7SM01732D ↗
32. 10.1021/la404296g10.1021/la404296g ↗
33. 10.1063/1.490515410.1063/1.4905154 ↗
34. Roger N. · Int. J. Sci. Res. · 2016 · 5 · 1300