Growth-Temperature Dependent Unpassivated Oxygen Bonds Determine the Gas Sensing Abilities of Chemical Vapor Deposition-Grown CuO Thin Films
Source abstract
Abstract
CuO is a multifunctional metal oxide excellent for chemiresistive gas sensors. In this work, we report CuO-based NO2 sensors fabricated via chemical vapor deposition (CVD). CVD allows great control on composition, stoichiometry, impurity, roughness, and grain size of films. This endows sensors with high selectivity, responsivity, sensitivity, and repeatability, low hysteresis, and quick recovery. All these are achieved without the need of expensive and unscalable nanostructures, or heterojunctions, with a technologically mature CVD. Films deposited at very low temperatures (≤350 °C) are sensitive but slow due to traps and small grains. Films deposited at high temperatures (≥550 °C) are not hysteretic but suffer from low sensitivity and slow response due to lack of surface states. Films deposited at optimum temperatures (350–450 °C) combine the best aspects of both regimes to yield NO2 sensors with a response of 300 % at 5 ppm, sensitivity limit of 300 ppb, hysteresis of <20%, repeatable performance, and recovery time of ∼1 min. The work demonstrates that CVD might be a more effective way to deposit oxide films for gas sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · ZnO doping and properties · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Nanoscience and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India
Funding
Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Ministry of Human Resource Development
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.17710.1016/j.snb.2016.08.177 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.12745510.1016/j.snb.2019.127455 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.9b0726310.1021/acsami.9b07263 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.02.02910.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.02.029 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.sna.2019.02.02710.1016/j.sna.2019.02.027 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10854-019-01232-010.1007/s10854-019-01232-0 ↗
7. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.293622310.1109/JSEN.2019.2936223 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mseb.2017.12.03610.1016/j.mseb.2017.12.036 ↗
9. 10.1021/acssensors.6b0005110.1021/acssensors.6b00051 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.22010.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.220 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.02.00610.1016/j.sna.2018.02.006 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.05510.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.055 ↗
13. 10.1039/c6cp07799d10.1039/c6cp07799d ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.07910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.079 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00604-018-2750-510.1007/s00604-018-2750-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.11.04610.1016/j.tsf.2018.11.046 ↗
17. 10.1002/cvde.20110691710.1002/cvde.201106917 ↗
18. 10.1039/c2ta01126c10.1039/c2ta01126c ↗
19. 10.3390/coatings812042510.3390/coatings8120425 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.09.03410.1016/j.snb.2012.09.034 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11664-018-6648-010.1007/s11664-018-6648-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.06310.1016/j.snb.2014.10.063 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.snb.2011.06.02410.1016/j.snb.2011.06.024 ↗
24. 10.1109/JSEN.2014.230103110.1109/JSEN.2014.2301031 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.snb.2008.08.02610.1016/j.snb.2008.08.026 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.9b1997110.1021/acsami.9b19971 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)01072-310.1016/S0925-4005(01)01072-3 ↗
28. 10.1021/la981544610.1021/la9815446 ↗
29. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/17/17500210.1088/0953-8984/24/17/175002 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.02110.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.021 ↗
31. 10.1039/c9na00749k10.1039/c9na00749k ↗
32. 10.1039/c9nr07699a10.1039/c9nr07699a ↗
33. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.01410.1016/j.snb.2015.12.014 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.05210.1016/j.cej.2015.10.052 ↗
35. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab032110.1088/1361-6528/ab0321 ↗