Suppressing Shuttle Effect Using Janus Cation Exchange Membrane for High-Performance Lithium–Sulfur Battery Separator
Source abstract
Abstract
Suppressing the shuttle effect of polysulfide ions to obtain high durability and good electrochemical performance is of great concern in the field of lithium–sulfur batteries. To address this issue, a Janus membrane consisting of an ultrathin dense layer and a robust microporous layer is fabricated using cation exchange resin. Different from the composite membranes made from polyolefin membranes, the multiple layers of the Janus membrane in this study are synchronously generated by one step, getting rid of the additional complex coating processes. Excellent overall performance is obtained by the cooperation of multiple factors. The excellent ionic selectivity of cation exchange resin renders a great suppression of the shuttle effect, endowing the lithium–sulfur battery with high Coulombic efficiency of 92.0–99.0% (LiNO 3 -free electrolyte). The ultrathin property of a dense layer renders a low ionic resistance, resulting in 60% higher discharge capacity over the entire C-rates (versus the control sample with Celgard 2400 membrane). The robust macroporous layer supports the ultrathin layer to achieve a free-standing property, ensuring the usability of the Janus membrane.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Beijing Key Lab of Fine Ceramics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Chemical Power Sources (SKL-ACPS), Guizhou Meiling Battery Co., Ltd., Guizhou 563003, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · State Key Laboratory of Advanced Chemical Power Sources
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr020738u10.1021/cr020738u ↗
2. 10.1021/ja309143810.1021/ja3091438 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.10210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.102 ↗
4. 10.1002/ange.20110063710.1002/ange.201100637 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp410385s10.1021/jp410385s ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20150021210.1002/aenm.201500212 ↗
7. 10.1021/cr500062v10.1021/cr500062v ↗
8. 10.1021/am505807k10.1021/am505807k ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.5b0545710.1021/acsami.5b05457 ↗
10. 10.1021/ar300179v10.1021/ar300179v ↗
11. 10.1021/jp512062t10.1021/jp512062t ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.6b0364210.1021/acsami.6b03642 ↗
13. 10.1002/advs.20150026810.1002/advs.201500268 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.6b0748710.1021/acsami.6b07487 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.6b0902710.1021/acsami.6b09027 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20150250510.1002/smll.201502505 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.6b0441810.1021/acsami.6b04418 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.03010.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.030 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.22510.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.225 ↗
20. 10.1039/C3EE42223B10.1039/C3EE42223B ↗
21. 10.1039/C6TA07198H10.1039/C6TA07198H ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20140289310.1002/adma.201402893 ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20150313310.1002/smll.201503133 ↗
24. 10.1002/advs.20160017510.1002/advs.201600175 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms401510.1038/ncomms4015 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.09010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.090 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.08510.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.085 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.01310.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.013 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.10010.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.100 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0458810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04588 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.01910.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.019 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.11210.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.112 ↗
33. 10.1021/nn404439r10.1021/nn404439r ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20141110910.1002/anie.201411109 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.08110.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.081 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.12210.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.122 ↗