journal article·2021-10-20Open access

Hybrid Plasmonic/Photonic Nanoscale Strategy for Multilevel Anticounterfeit Labels

Vincenzo Caligiuri, Aniket Patra, Maria P. De Santo, Agostino Forestiero, Giuseppe Papuzzo, Dante M. Aceti, Giuseppe E. Lio, Riccardo Barberi, Antonio De Luca

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 41

Abstract

Innovative goods authentication strategies are of fundamental importance considering the increasing counterfeiting levels. Such a task has been effectively addressed with the so-called physical unclonable functions (PUFs), being physical properties of a system that characterize it univocally. PUFs are commonly implemented by exploiting naturally occurring non-idealities in clean-room fabrication processes. The broad availability of classic paradigm PUFs, however, makes them vulnerable. Here, we propose a hybrid plasmonic/photonic multilayered structure working as a three-level strong PUF. Our approach leverages on the combination of a functional nanostructured surface, a resonant response, and a unique chromatic signature all together in one single device. The structure consists of a resonant cavity, where the top mirror is replaced with a layer of plasmonic Ag nanoislands. The naturally random spatial distribution of clusters and nanoparticles formed by this deposition technique constitutes the manufacturer-resistant nanoscale morphological fingerprint of the proposed PUF. The presence of Ag nanoislands allows us to tailor the interplay between the photonic and plasmonic modes to achieve two additional security levels. The first one is constituted by the chromatic response and broad iridescence of our structures, while the second by their rich spectral response, accessible even through a common smartphone light-emitting diode. We demonstrate that the proposed architectures could also be used as an irreversible and quantitative temperature exposure label. The proposed PUFs are inexpensive, chip-to-wafer-size scalable, and can be deposited over a variety of substrates. They also hold a great promise as an encryption framework envisioning morpho-cryptography applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, University of Calabria, via P. Bucci, 31C, 87036 Rende, Cosenza, Italy

CNR Nanotec UOS Rende, via P. Bucci, 31D, 87036 Rende, Cosenza, Italy

Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego 30, 16163 Genova (GE), Italy

CNR-ICAR, Institute for High Performance and Networking, via P. Bucci 8-9c, 87036 Rende, Cosenza, Italy

Institute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 72, Tsarigradsko Chaussee Blvd, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria

CNR-INO and European Laboratory for Non Linear Spectroscopy (LENS), Via Nello Carrara, 1, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019 Firenze (FI), Italy

Funding

Ministero dell???Istruzione, dell???Universit?? e della Ricerca

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41928-020-0372-510.1038/s41928-020-0372-5 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.dcan.2017.04.00310.1016/j.dcan.2017.04.003 ↗
3. Gassend, B.; Clarke, D.; van Dijk, M.; Devadas, S. Silicon Physical Random Functions Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security—CCS’02; Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): New York, USA, 2002; p 148.10.1145/586110.586132 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.507940710.1063/1.5079407 ↗
5. 10.1109/JPROC.2014.232051610.1109/JPROC.2014.2320516 ↗
6. Maes R. · 2010 · 3
7. Grubel, B. C.; Bosworth, B. T.; Kossey, M.; Cooper, A. B.; Foster, M. A.; Foster, A. C. Secure Authentication Using the Ultrafast Response of Chaotic Silicon Photonic Microcavities 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, CLEO 2016; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016; p SF1F.2.10.1364/CLEO_SI.2016.SF1F.2 ↗
8. 10.1364/oe.26.00471010.1364/oe.26.004710 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12274-020-3033-010.1007/s12274-020-3033-0 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-020-19324-510.1038/s41467-020-19324-5 ↗
11. Yin, C. E.; Qu, G. Temperature-Aware Cooperative Ring Oscillator Puf. 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust, HOST 2009, 2009; pp 36–42.
12. Maiti, A.; Schaumont, P. Improving the Quality of a Physical Unclonable Function Using Configurable Ring Oscillators. FPL 09: 19th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 2009; pp 703–707.10.1109/FPL.2009.5272361 ↗
13. Maiti, A.; Casarona, J.; McHale, L.; Schaumont, P. A Large Scale Characterization of RO-PUF. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust, HOST 2010, 2010; pp 94–99.10.1109/HST.2010.5513108 ↗
14. 10.1109/TVLSI.2018.286618810.1109/TVLSI.2018.2866188 ↗
15. 10.1109/JPROC.2014.238735310.1109/JPROC.2014.2387353 ↗
16. 10.1039/c3tc00818e10.1039/c3tc00818e ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.8b1740310.1021/acsami.8b17403 ↗
18. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/15/15530310.1088/0957-4484/25/15/155303 ↗
19. 10.1364/ao.56.00286310.1364/ao.56.002863 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20180788010.1002/adma.201807880 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.00410.1016/j.msec.2016.03.004 ↗
22. 10.1117/1.oe.51.4.04050610.1117/1.oe.51.4.040506 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.02810.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.028 ↗
24. 10.3390/nano806038610.3390/nano8060386 ↗
25. 10.1039/c7cc00769h10.1039/c7cc00769h ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.8b1166310.1021/acsami.8b11663 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12835010.1016/j.cej.2020.128350 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.1c0239010.1021/acsami.1c02390 ↗
29. 10.1038/s42005-019-0139-310.1038/s42005-019-0139-3 ↗
30. McCarthy L. D. · 2004 · 5310 · 10310.1117/12.528099 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.511005110.1063/1.5110051 ↗
32. 10.1039/c4tc01607f10.1039/c4tc01607f ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0641510.1021/acsnano.5b06415 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0235010.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02350 ↗
35. 10.1126/sciadv.160248710.1126/sciadv.1602487 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0486410.1021/acsnano.5b04864 ↗
37. 10.1021/nl404129n10.1021/nl404129n ↗
38. 10.1021/nl501498610.1021/nl5014986 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20110264610.1002/adma.201102646 ↗
40. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.8810.1038/natrevmats.2016.88 ↗
41. 10.1021/nl302110z10.1021/nl302110z ↗
42. 10.1038/nature1165310.1038/nature11653 ↗
43. 10.1038/nature1088910.1038/nature10889 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0322410.1021/acsnano.0c03224 ↗
45. 10.1109/JLT.2019.292094910.1109/JLT.2019.2920949 ↗
46. 10.1002/adfm.20167005310.1002/adfm.201670053 ↗
47. Maier S. A. · 200710.1007/0-387-37825-1 ↗
48. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1990.tb01079.x10.1111/j.1475-4754.1990.tb01079.x ↗
49. 10.1021/acsami.0c1684610.1021/acsami.0c16846 ↗
50. 10.1039/c8nr10539a10.1039/c8nr10539a ↗
51. 10.1039/c5tc02919h10.1039/c5tc02919h ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20147017810.1002/adma.201470178 ↗
53. 10.1038/nmat216210.1038/nmat2162 ↗
54. 10.1021/jp806384910.1021/jp8063849 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.06.08010.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.06.080 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41467-019-14066-510.1038/s41467-019-14066-5 ↗
57. 10.1515/nanoph-2019-005410.1515/nanoph-2019-0054 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0056410.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00564 ↗
59. 10.1002/adpr.20210005310.1002/adpr.202100053 ↗
60. 10.1002/adom.20190121510.1002/adom.201901215 ↗
61. 10.1021/ph500410u10.1021/ph500410u ↗
62. 10.1364/oe.27.03616410.1364/oe.27.036164 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.08510910.1103/PhysRevB.98.085109 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.16510310.1103/PhysRevB.86.165103 ↗
65. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0150010.1021/acsphotonics.0c01500 ↗
66. 10.1002/adom.20200048710.1002/adom.202000487 ↗
67. 10.1002/adma.20200864410.1002/adma.202008644 ↗
68. 10.1021/ACS.NANOLETT.9B0056410.1021/ACS.NANOLETT.9B00564 ↗
69. 10.1039/C8NR10539A10.1039/C8NR10539A ↗
70. Lowe, D. G. Object Recognition from Local Scale-Invariant Features. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; IEEE, 1999; Vol. 2, pp 1150–1157.10.1109/ICCV.1999.790410 ↗
71. 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.9410.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗