journal article·2020-03-11

Rational Design of Ion Exchange Membrane Material Properties Limits the Crossover of CO2 Reduction Products in Artificial Photosynthesis Devices

Maximilian Krödel, Blaine M. Carter, Deniz Rall, Johannes Lohaus, Matthias Wessling, Daniel J. Miller

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Efficient operation is crucial for the deployment of photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction devices for large-scale artificial photosynthesis. In these devices, undesired transport of CO2 reduction products from the reduction electrode to the oxidation electrode may occur through a liquid electrolyte and an ion exchange membrane, reducing device productivity and increasing the energy required for product purification. Our work investigated the CO2 reduction product crossover through ion exchange membranes separating the cathode and anode compartments in CO2 reduction cells. The concentrations of liquid products produced by CO2 reduction on copper foil were measured. A systematic approach for the investigation of product crossover was developed. The crossover of products was analyzed over a range of working electrode potentials (−1.08 V vs RHE to −0.88 V vs RHE) in cells employing a commercial Selemion AMV membrane and a new poly(vinylimidazolium) family of ion exchange membranes with variable chemical and structural properties. We found that product loss due to electromigration of charged species in the device was more significant than product loss due to diffusion of uncharged species. To reduce the crossover of CO2 reduction products, the influence of membrane properties such as the ionic conductivity and water volume fraction was investigated for the Selemion AMV membrane and poly(vinylimidazolium) membranes with variable material properties. We show that the water volume fraction and, by extension, ionic conductivity of the membrane may be controlled to reduce product crossover in CO2 reduction artificial photosynthesis devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley 94720-8099, United States

Department of Chemical Process Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52074, Germany

DWI-Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Aachen, Germany

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst · RWTH Aachen University · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Office of Science · Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Olivier, J. G. J.; Janssens-Maenhout, G.; Muntean, M.; Peters, J. A. H. W. Trends in Global CO2 Emission: 2015 Report, 2015.
2. US Department of Commerce—National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association. Global CO2 Level from Ice Cores, 2018.
3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, 2005.
4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014; Synthesis Report, 2014.
5. 10.1038/ncomms895810.1038/ncomms8958 ↗
6. 10.1038/nchem.102110.1038/nchem.1021 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0043510.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00435 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja077632710.1021/ja0776327 ↗
9. 10.1039/c7ee01764b10.1039/c7ee01764b ↗
10. 10.1149/2.035408jes10.1149/2.035408jes ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.03710.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.037 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.05110.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.051 ↗
13. 10.1039/c3cp50890k10.1039/c3cp50890k ↗
14. 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.10664510.1016/j.elecom.2019.106645 ↗
15. 10.1039/c5cp05665a10.1039/c5cp05665a ↗
16. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0347710.1021/acscatal.7b03477 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.04310.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.043 ↗
18. 10.1039/c3ee43807d10.1039/c3ee43807d ↗
19. 10.1016/j.rser.2009.04.00410.1016/j.rser.2009.04.004 ↗
20. 10.1039/c5ee02783g10.1039/c5ee02783g ↗
21. 10.1039/c9ta00498j10.1039/c9ta00498j ↗
22. 10.1039/c2ee21234j10.1039/c2ee21234j ↗
23. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0134010.1021/acscatal.8b01340 ↗
24. 10.1002/macp.1968.02118010210.1002/macp.1968.021180102 ↗
25. 10.1021/ie202546z10.1021/ie202546z ↗
26. 10.1021/am403207w10.1021/am403207w ↗
27. 10.1039/c6cp05287h10.1039/c6cp05287h ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.9b1892410.1021/acsami.9b18924 ↗
29. 10.1021/cr300463y10.1021/cr300463y ↗
30. 10.1039/c4cp00692e10.1039/c4cp00692e ↗
31. 10.1063/1.502480210.1063/1.5024802 ↗
32. Wendt H. · 2010
33. 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.01.07610.1016/j.ssi.2004.01.076 ↗
34. 10.1016/s0022-0728(01)00355-210.1016/s0022-0728(01)00355-2 ↗
35. Lide D. · 2010
36. 10.1038/s41467-018-03286-w10.1038/s41467-018-03286-w ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.04510.1016/j.cej.2019.01.045 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0055310.1021/acsenergylett.8b00553 ↗
39. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0380710.1021/acscatal.7b03807 ↗
40. 10.2533/chimia.2015.76910.2533/chimia.2015.769 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.00910.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.009 ↗
42. Rice J. A. · 2006
43. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.01410.1016/j.joule.2018.01.014 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.01310.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.07010.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.070 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0098610.1021/acsaem.9b00986 ↗