Electron Collection in Host–Guest Nanostructured Hematite Photoanodes for Water Splitting: The Influence of Scaffold Doping Density
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanostructuring has proven to be a successful strategy in overcoming the trade-off between light absorption and hole transport to the solid/electrolyte interface in hematite photoanodes for water splitting. The suggestion that poor electron (majority carrier) collection hinders the performance of nanostructured hematite electrodes has led to the emergence of host-guest architectures in which the absorber layer is deposited onto a transparent high-surface-area electron collector. To date, however, state of the art nanostructured hematite electrodes still outperform their host-guest counterparts, and a quantitative evaluation of the benefits of the host-guest architecture is still lacking. In this paper, we examine the impact of host-guest architectures by comparing nanostructured tin-doped hematite electrodes with hematite nanoparticle layers coated onto two types of conducting macroporous SnO2 scaffolds. Analysis of the external quantum efficiency spectra for substrate (SI) and electrolyte side (EI) illumination reveals that the electron diffusion length in the host-guest electrodes based on an undoped SnO2 scaffold is increased substantially relative to the nanostructured hematite electrode without a supporting scaffold. Nevertheless, electron collection is still incomplete for EI illumination. By contrast, an electron collection efficiency of 100% is achieved by fabricating the scaffold using antimony-doped SnO2, showing that the scaffold conductivity is crucial for the device performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Center for NanoScience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstr. 5-11, D-81377 Munich, Germany
Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 40237 Düsseldorf, Germany
Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, BA2 7AY, Bath, United Kingdom
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Center for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Sivula K. · ChemSusChem · 2011 · 4 · 43210.1002/cssc.201000416 ↗
2. Grätzel M. · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 33810.1038/35104607 ↗
3. Hara M. · Chem. Commun. · 1998 · 3 · 35710.1039/a707440i ↗
4. Sivula K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 743610.1021/ja101564f ↗
5. Bolton J. R. · Nature · 1985 · 316 · 49510.1038/316495a0 ↗
6. Dare-Edwards M. P. · J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. · 1983 · 79 · 202710.1039/f19837902027 ↗
7. Kennedy J. H. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1978 · 125 · 70910.1149/1.2131532 ↗
8. Fu Y. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 350 · 49110.1016/S0009-2614(01)01352-5 ↗
9. Mushove T. · Meeting Abstracts · 2013 · 2013 · 254110.1149/MA2013-02/44/2541 ↗
10. Tilley S. D. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2010 · 49 · 640510.1002/anie.201003110 ↗
11. Fu Y. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 350 · 49110.1016/S0009-2614(01)01352-5 ↗
12. Yuan L. · Mater. Sci. Eng., B · 2012 · 177 · 32710.1016/j.mseb.2011.12.034 ↗
13. LaTempa T. J. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1629310.1021/jp904560n ↗
14. Cesar I. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 77210.1021/jp809060p ↗
15. Itoh K. B. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1984 · 131 · 126610.1149/1.2115798 ↗
16. Sivula K. · Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 286210.1021/cm900565a ↗
17. Wang L. · ChemSusChem · 2014 · 7 · 42110.1002/cssc.201301120 ↗
18. Sun Y. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 549410.1021/am405628r ↗
19. Qiu Y. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 212310.1021/nl500359e ↗
20. Riha S. C. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 36010.1021/am302356k ↗
21. Stefik M. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 543110.1021/nl303101n ↗
22. Young Kim J. · RSC Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 941510.1039/c2ra21169f ↗
23. Le Formal F. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 109910.1002/adfm.200902060 ↗
24. Hisatomi T. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 269910.1002/adma.201104868 ↗
25. Wang D. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 6 · 3610.1021/am405137p ↗
26. Mandlmeier B. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 650410.1039/c3ta13165c ↗
27. Fried D. I. · Nanoscale · 2011 · 3 · 123410.1039/c0nr00872a ↗
28. Dunn H. K. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 2461010.1039/C4CP03946G ↗
29. Schuster J. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2012 · 51 · 359110.1002/anie.201107817 ↗
30. Strecker A. · Prakt. Metallogr. · 1993 · 30 · 48210.1515/pm-1993-301002 ↗
31. Klahr B. M. · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 46110.1021/la103541n ↗
32. Li F. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2010 · 50 · 36010.1002/anie.201001451 ↗
33. Frydrych J. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 2323210.1039/c2jm34639g ↗
34. Södergren S. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1994 · 98 · 555210.1021/j100072a023 ↗
35. Leng W. H. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 96710.1021/jz100051q ↗
36. Wang H. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2000 · 104 · 568610.1021/jp0002751 ↗
37. Le Formal F. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 256410.1021/ja412058x ↗