Revealing the Effect of Irradiation on Cement Hydrates: Evidence of a Topological Self-Organization
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite the crucial role of concrete in the construction of nuclear power plants, the effects of radiation exposure (i.e., in the form of neutrons) on the calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H, i.e., the glue of concrete) remain largely unknown. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we systematically investigate the effects of irradiation on the structure of C-S-H across a range of compositions. Expectedly, although C-S-H is more resistant to irradiation than typical crystalline silicates, such as quartz, we observe that radiation exposure affects C-S-H's structural order, silicate mean chain length, and the amount of molecular water that is present in the atomic network. By topological analysis, we show that these "structural effects" arise from a self-organization of the atomic network of C-S-H upon irradiation. This topological self-organization is driven by the (initial) presence of atomic eigenstress in the C-S-H network and is facilitated by the presence of water in the network. Overall, we show that C-S-H exhibits an optimal resistance to radiation damage when its atomic network is isostatic (at Ca/Si = 1.5). Such an improved understanding of the response of C-S-H to irradiation can pave the way to the design of durable concrete for radiation applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Glass properties and applications · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8019, United States
Funding
Nuclear Energy University Programs · University of California, Los Angeles · Federal Highway Administration · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Kaplan M. F. · 1989
2. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.10.00310.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.10.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.10.01410.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.10.014 ↗
4. Hilsdorf H. K. · 1978
5. Fillmore, D. L.;Literature Review of the Effects of Radiation and Temperature on the Aging of Concrete;United States Department of Energy, 2004.
6. 10.1038/srep2015510.1038/srep20155 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.492652710.1063/1.4926527 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.495542910.1063/1.4955429 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.00410.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.004 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms596010.1038/ncomms5960 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.6b1158710.1021/acsami.6b11587 ↗
12. Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant, 2017.https://www.duke-energy.com/our-company/about-us/power-plants/crystal-river.
13. Office, U. S. G. A. Nuclear Waste: Opportunities Exist to Reduce Risks and Costs by Evaluating Different Waste Treatment Approaches at Hanford, No. GAO-17-306, 2017.
14. Kontani, O.; Sawada, S.; Maruyama, I.; Takizawa, M.; Sato, O.Evaluation of Irradiation Effects on Concrete Structure: Gamma-Ray Irradiation Tests on Cement Paste, ASME Power Conference, V002T07A002;ASME, 2013.10.1115/POWER2013-98099 ↗
15. 10.12693/APhysPolA.114.39910.12693/APhysPolA.114.399 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0113575810.1007/BF01135758 ↗
17. Granta, S.; Montagnini, A.Studies on Behavior of Concretes under Irradiation, Spec. Publ.ACI, 1972; Vol.34, pp1163–1172.
18. 10.1038/nmat187110.1038/nmat1871 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.486411810.1063/1.4864118 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.487865610.1063/1.4878656 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.090218010610.1073/pnas.0902180106 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.09.00310.1016/j.cemconres.2014.09.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.02510.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.025 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.03550210.1103/PhysRevLett.119.035502 ↗
25. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.44811810.1063/1.448118 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp004368u10.1021/jp004368u ↗
28. 10.1021/ja209152n10.1021/ja209152n ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.03.02610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.03.026 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.02.01710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.02.017 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0303610.1021/acsnano.6b03036 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.03.01710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.03.017 ↗
33. 10.1021/jp502550z10.1021/jp502550z ↗
34. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00867-510.1016/S0022-3093(01)00867-5 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.05420110.1103/PhysRevB.84.054201 ↗
36. Bauchy M. · Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. · 2012 · 91 · 34
37. 10.1038/ncomms739810.1038/ncomms7398 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.09550110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.095501 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRev.119.62310.1103/PhysRev.119.623 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.12550210.1103/PhysRevLett.114.125502 ↗
41. Mauro J. C. · Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. · 2011 · 90 · 31
42. 10.1016/0022-3093(79)90033-410.1016/0022-3093(79)90033-4 ↗
43. 10.1557/mrs.2016.29810.1557/mrs.2016.298 ↗
44. Maxwell J. C. · London, Edinburgh Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. · 1864 · 27 · 29410.1080/14786446408643668 ↗
45. 10.1016/0038-1098(85)90381-310.1016/0038-1098(85)90381-3 ↗
46. 10.1080/1478643050025642510.1080/14786430500256425 ↗
47. 10.1557/mrs.2016.30010.1557/mrs.2016.300 ↗
48. 10.1557/PROC-754-CC8.110.1557/PROC-754-CC8.1 ↗
49. 10.1209/epl/i2000-00485-910.1209/epl/i2000-00485-9 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.02420110.1103/PhysRevB.79.024201 ↗
51. 10.2138/am.2008.290310.2138/am.2008.2903 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.01611610.1103/PhysRevE.74.016116 ↗
53. 10.1080/1478643050025642510.1080/14786430500256425 ↗
54. 10.1088/0953-8984/17/32/00310.1088/0953-8984/17/32/003 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.05610810.1103/PhysRevE.75.056108 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.324530310.1063/1.3245303 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.307716810.1063/1.3077168 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.315243210.1063/1.3152432 ↗
59. 10.1038/358031a010.1038/358031a0 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.13420110.1103/PhysRevB.92.134201 ↗
61. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07990.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07990.x ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.03101910.1103/PhysRevX.7.031019 ↗