journal article·2019-11-27

Self-Assembled and Self-Monitored Sorafenib/Indocyanine Green Nanodrug with Synergistic Antitumor Activity Mediated by Hyperthermia and Reactive Oxygen Species-Induced Apoptosis

Haiqiu Wu, Cun Wang, Jiaxin Sun, Luyan Sun, Jiaxun Wan, Siying Wang, Dishui Gu, Chengtao Yu, Chen Yang, Jia He, Zihao Zhang, Yuanyuan Lv, Hui Wang, Ming Yao, Wenxin Qin, Changchun Wang, Haojie Jin

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 47
Publisher page

Abstract

Liver cancer is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in China. Sorafenib (SRF) is currently the most commonly used systemic agent against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is the most common type of liver cancer. However, HCC patients have only limited benefit and suffer a serious side effect from SRF. Therefore, new approaches are urgently needed to improve the therapeutic effectiveness of SRF and reduce its side effect. In our current study, we developed a self-imaging and self-delivered nanodrug with SRF and indocyanine (ICG) to improve the therapeutic effect of sorafenib against HCC. With the π-π stacking effect between SRF and ICG, a one-step nanoprecipitation method was designed to obtain the SRF/ICG nanoparticles (SINP) via self-assembly. Pluronic F127 was used to shield the SINP to further improve the stability in an aqueous environment. The stability, photothermal effect, cell uptake, ROS production, cytotoxicity, tumor imaging, and tumor-targeting and tumor-killing efficacy of the SINP were evaluated in vitro and in vivo by using an HCC cell line Huh7 and its xenograft tumor model. We found that our designed SINP showed monodisperse stability and efficient photothermal effect both in vitro and in vivo. SINP could rapidly enter Huh7 cells and achieve potent cytotoxicity under near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation partly by producing a great amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS). SINP had significantly improved stability and blood half-life, and could specifically target tumor via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in vivo. In addition, SINP showed improved cytotoxicity in both subcutaneous and orthotopic HCC implantation models in vivo. Overall, this rationally designed sorafenib delivery system with a very high loading capacity (33%) has considerably improved antitumor efficiency in vitro and could completely eliminate subcutaneous tumors without any regrowth in vivo. In conclusion, our self-imaging and self-delivered nanodrug could improve the efficacy of SRF and might be a potential therapy for HCC patients.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China

State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, and Department of Macromolecular Science, Laboratory of Advanced Materials, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China

School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200032, China

Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine · Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3322/caac.2133810.3322/caac.21338 ↗
2. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.04810.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.048 ↗
3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.06510.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.065 ↗
4. 10.1056/NEJMoa070885710.1056/NEJMoa0708857 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.024 ↗
6. 10.2165/00003495-200969020-0000610.2165/00003495-200969020-00006 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-710.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.5b0620310.1021/acsami.5b06203 ↗
9. 10.1002/adhm.20150023510.1002/adhm.201500235 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.03510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.035 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.00310.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.003 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20170669710.1002/adma.201706697 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.025 ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.6b0831310.1021/jacs.6b08313 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7TB02573D10.1039/C7TB02573D ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20170299410.1002/smll.201702994 ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20170304510.1002/smll.201703045 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20170445810.1002/anie.201704458 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0767110.1021/acsnano.5b07671 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20160171010.1002/adma.201601710 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.161930211410.1073/pnas.1619302114 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.09.00610.1016/j.canlet.2016.09.006 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.7b1533210.1021/acsami.7b15332 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20130449710.1002/adma.201304497 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20140563410.1002/adma.201405634 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20120221110.1002/adma.201202211 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-018-27204-810.1038/s41598-018-27204-8 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20150022910.1002/adma.201500229 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0788210.1021/acsnano.5b07882 ↗
30. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.21210.1038/nrclinonc.2016.212 ↗
31. 10.1021/mp800164910.1021/mp8001649 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20140430810.1002/adma.201404308 ↗
33. 10.1021/ja049441z10.1021/ja049441z ↗
34. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.04510.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.045 ↗
35. 10.1021/nl102184c10.1021/nl102184c ↗
36. 10.1038/nbt.333010.1038/nbt.3330 ↗
37. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-382210.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3822 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11434-014-0273-y10.1007/s11434-014-0273-y ↗
39. 10.1038/nrd355410.1038/nrd3554 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41598-017-14401-010.1038/s41598-017-14401-0 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.07510.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.075 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.nantod.2012.08.00510.1016/j.nantod.2012.08.005 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.11.01210.1016/j.jconrel.2014.11.012 ↗
44. 10.1038/cddis.2016.10510.1038/cddis.2016.105 ↗
45. 10.1038/nrc380310.1038/nrc3803 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0203810.1021/acsnano.8b02038 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.01210.1016/j.cell.2018.04.012 ↗
48. 10.3892/ijo.2014.225210.3892/ijo.2014.2252 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.08.01110.1016/j.bcp.2016.08.011 ↗
50. 10.4161/cbt.8.20.943610.4161/cbt.8.20.9436 ↗
51. 10.1039/C6CC09624G10.1039/C6CC09624G ↗
52. 10.1002/ijc.2375210.1002/ijc.23752 ↗
53. 10.4161/cbt.9.6.1139210.4161/cbt.9.6.11392 ↗
54. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.03910.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.039 ↗
55. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-137710.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1377 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.07.00410.1016/j.jhep.2018.07.004 ↗