Structure vs Chemistry: Friction and Wear of Pt-Based Metallic Surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
In comparison of a Pt57.5Cu14.7Ni5.3P22.5 metallic glass with a Pt(111) single crystal we find that wearless friction is determined by chemistry through bond formation alloying, while wear is determined by structure through plasticity mechanisms. In the wearless regime, friction is affected by the chemical composition of the counter body and involves the formation of a liquid-like neck and interfacial alloying. The wear behavior of Pt-based metallic surfaces is determined by their structural properties and corresponding mechanisms for plastic deformation. In the case of Pt(111) wear occurs by dislocation-mediated homogeneous plastic deformation. In contrast the wear of Pt57.5Cu14.7Ni5.3P22.5 metallic glass occurs through localized plastic deformation in shear bands that merge together in a single shear zone above a critical load and corresponds to the shear softening of metallic glasses. These results open a new route in the control of friction and wear of metals and are relevant for the development of self-lubricated and wear-resistant mechanical devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
INM − Leibniz-Institute for New Materials, Nanotribology Group, Campus D2 2, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
WPI-Advanced Institute of Materials Research, 2-1-1 Katahira Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Tomlinson G. A. · Philos. Mag. · 1929 · 7 · 90510.1080/14786440608564819 ↗
2. Bennewitz R. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 301
3. Enachescu M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 769410.1063/1.1738536 ↗
4. Bowden F. P. · 2008
5. Stott F. H. · Tribol. Int. · 1978 · 11 · 21110.1016/0301-679X(78)90178-0 ↗
6. Inoue A. · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 27910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6 ↗
7. Cheng Y. Q. · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 56 · 37910.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.002 ↗
8. Trexler M. M. · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 55 · 75910.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.002 ↗
9. Zhang G. Q. · Mater. Sci. Eng., A · 2008 · 475 · 12410.1016/j.msea.2007.05.039 ↗
10. Boswell P. G. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1979 · 14 · 150510.1007/BF00549329 ↗
11. Kishore U. S. · Acta Metall. · 1987 · 35 · 146310.1016/0001-6160(87)90092-7 ↗
12. Caron A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 083515-110.1063/1.3573778 ↗
13. Pleth Nielsen L. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 71 · 75410.1103/PhysRevLett.71.754 ↗
14. Ashtekar S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 166103-110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.166103 ↗
15. Oreshkin A. I. · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 521610.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.014 ↗
16. Nonnenmacher M. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 1991 · 9 · 135810.1116/1.585196 ↗
17. Carpick R. W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 70 · 154810.1063/1.118639 ↗
18. Johnson K. L. · 1987
19. Schroers J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 255506-110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.255506 ↗
20. McNeil L. E. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1992 · 5 · 1681
21. Park J. Y. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 144203-1
22. Park J. Y. · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 024203-1
23. Merkle A. P. · Wear · 2008 · 256 · 186410.1016/j.wear.2008.04.032 ↗
24. Landman U. · Science · 1990 · 248 · 45410.1126/science.248.4954.454 ↗
25. Okamoto H. · 2000
26. Ottaviani G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 24 · 335410.1103/PhysRevB.24.3354 ↗
27. Topor L. · Z. Metallkd. · 1986 · 77 · 65
28. Mishra M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 045452-110.1103/PhysRevB.86.045452 ↗
29. Wilde G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 251904-110.1063/1.3602315 ↗
30. Kong J. · Tribol. Lett. · 2009 · 35 · 15110.1007/s11249-009-9444-4 ↗
31. Bhushan B. · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 15 · 74910.1088/0957-4484/15/7/006 ↗
32. Caron A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 171907-110.1063/1.3655999 ↗