Regulation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenesis by Specific Surface Density of Fibronectin: a Gradient Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The success of synthetic bone implants requires good interface between the material and the host tissue. To study the biological relevance of fibronectin (FN) density on the osteogenic commitment of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs), human FN was adsorbed in a linear density gradient on the surface of PCL. The evolution of the osteogenic markers alkaline phosphatase and collagen 1 alpha 1 was monitored by immunohistochemistry, and the cytoskeletal organization and the cell-derived FN were assessed. The functional analysis of the gradient revealed that the lower FN-density elicited stronger osteogenic expression and higher cytoskeleton spreading, hallmarks of the stem cell commitment to the osteoblastic lineage. The identification of the optimal FN density regime for the osteogenic commitment of hBM-MSCs presents a simple and versatile strategy to significantly enhance the surface properties of polycaprolactone as a paradigm for other synthetic polymers intended for bone-related applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Cell Adhesion Molecules Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
3B’s Research Group − Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, Department of Polymer Engineering, University of Minho, 4806-909 Caldas das Taipas, Guimarães, Portugal
ICVS/3B’s − PT Government Associate Laboratory, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal
Laboratory for Materials-Biology Interactions, EMPA Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, CH-9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland
Funding
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · Swiss National Science Foundation
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Drachuk I. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2013 · 23 · 443710.1002/adfm.201300038 ↗
2. Martins A. · Small · 2009 · 5 · 119510.1002/smll.200801648 ↗
3. Badylak S. F. · Acta Biomater. · 2009 · 5 · 110.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.013 ↗
4. Serrano M. C. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2010 · 2 · 19210.1002/adfm.200901040 ↗
5. Boskey A. L. · BoneKey Rep. · 2013 · 2 · 44710.1038/bonekey.2013.181 ↗
6. Kadler K. E. · Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. · 2008 · 20 · 49510.1016/j.ceb.2008.06.008 ↗
7. Erat M. C. · J. Biol. Chem. · 2013 · 288 · 1744110.1074/jbc.M113.469841 ↗
8. Imbert L. · Bone · 2014 · 65 · 1810.1016/j.bone.2014.04.030 ↗
9. To W. S. · Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair · 2011 · 4 · 2110.1186/1755-1536-4-21 ↗
10. Caplan A. I. · J. Pathol. · 2009 · 217 · 31810.1002/path.2469 ↗
11. Faia-Torres A. B. · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 902310.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.015 ↗
12. Harris G. M. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 239610.1002/adfm.201303400 ↗
13. Caliari S. R. · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2014 · 3 · 108610.1002/adhm.201300646 ↗
14. Zink C. · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 805510.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.037 ↗
15. Lamb B. M. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 1152310.1021/am502209k ↗
16. Liu W. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 284210.1021/am405418g ↗
17. Alves H. · J. Cell. Mol. Med. · 2010 · 14 · 272910.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00931.x ↗
18. Ghaemi S. R. · Biomacromolecules · 2013 · 14 · 267510.1021/bm400531n ↗
19. Feller L. M. · Macromolecules · 2005 · 38 · 1050310.1021/ma051424m ↗
20. Engvall E. · Int. J. Cancer · 1997 · 20 · 110.1002/ijc.2910200102 ↗
21. Heuberger M. · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 724510.1088/0022-3727/40/23/S07 ↗
22. Schindelin J. · Nat. Methods · 2012 · 9 · 67610.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
23. Studer D. · Tissue Eng., Part C · 2012 · 18 · 76110.1089/ten.tec.2012.0081 ↗
24. Feijter J. A. D. · Biopolymers · 1978 · 17 · 175910.1002/bip.1978.360170711 ↗
25. Hynes R. O. · Science · 2009 · 326 · 121610.1126/science.1176009 ↗
26. Lu P. · Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. · 2011 · 3 · a005058
27. Era S. · NMR Biomed. · 2011 · 24 · 48310.1002/nbm.1612 ↗
28. Latour R. A. · 2008
29. Ramanathan A. · Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. · 2014 · 433 · 39510.1016/j.bbrc.2013.11.090 ↗
30. Cavalcanti-Adam E. A. · Biophys. J. · 2007 · 92 · 296410.1529/biophysj.106.089730 ↗
31. Bradshaw M. J. · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 152410.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.027 ↗
32. Zhou Y. · Eur. Cell. Mater. · 2011 · 22 · 1210.22203/eCM.v022a02 ↗
33. McBeath R. · Dev. Cell · 2004 · 6 · 48310.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9 ↗
34. Schwab E. H. · Int. J. Med. Sci. · 2013 · 10 · 184610.7150/ijms.6908 ↗
35. Linsley C. · Tissue Eng. Pt. A · 2013 · 19 · 141610.1089/ten.tea.2012.0523 ↗
36. Sottile J. · Mol. Biol. Cell · 2002 · 13 · 354610.1091/mbc.e02-01-0048 ↗
37. Weiss R. E. · J. Cell Biol. · 1981 · 88 · 63010.1083/jcb.88.3.630 ↗
38. Li B. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 242510.1038/srep02425 ↗
39. Bentmann A. · J. Bone Miner. Res. · 2010 · 25 · 70610.1359/jbmr.091011 ↗
40. Mathieu P. S. · Tissue Eng., Part B · 2012 · 18 · 43410.1089/ten.teb.2012.0014 ↗