journal article·2018-07-05

Soft Nanohydrogels Based on Laponite Nanodiscs: A Versatile Drug Delivery Platform for Theranostics and Drug Cocktails

Tiago B. Becher, Monique C. P. Mendonça, Marcelo A. de Farias, Rodrigo V. Portugal, Marcelo B. de Jesus, Catia Ornelas

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 26
Publisher page

Abstract

A new nanohydrogel drug delivery platform based on Laponite nanodiscs, polyacrylate, and sodium phosphate salts is described. The hybrid nanohydrogel is tailored to obtain soft and flexible nanohydrogels with G′ around 3 kPa, which has been proposed as the ideal stiffness for drug delivery applications. In vitro studies demonstrate that the new nanohydrogels are biocompatible, biodegradable, nonswellable, pH-responsive, and noncytotoxic and are able to deliver antineoplastic drugs into cancer cells. The IC50 of nanohydrogels containing cisplatin, 4-fluorouracil, and cyclophosphamide is significantly lower than the IC50 of the free drugs. In vivo experiments suggest that the new nanomaterials are biocompatible and do not accumulate in crucial organs. The simple formulation procedure enables encapsulation of virtually any water-soluble molecule, without the need for chemical modification of the guests. These nanohydrogels are a versatile platform that enables the simultaneous encapsulation of several cancer drugs, yielding an efficient drug cocktail delivery system, which for instance presents a positive synergistic effect against MCF-7 cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Clay minerals and soil interactions · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Brazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory (LNNano), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), 13083-970 Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20050161210.1002/adma.200501612 ↗
2. Oishi M. · 2010 · 8710.1007/978-1-4419-5919-5_5 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr200157d10.1021/cr200157d ↗
4. 10.1021/cr500131f10.1021/cr500131f ↗
5. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.10.00410.1016/j.addr.2015.10.004 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0084210.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00842 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.12.02010.1016/j.jconrel.2016.12.020 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.5b0782710.1021/acsami.5b07827 ↗
9. Muggia F. M. · Clin. Cancer Res. · 1999 · 5 · 7
10. 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.03.00410.1016/j.drudis.2011.03.004 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.5b0598410.1021/acsami.5b05984 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.7b1936110.1021/acsami.7b19361 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.00410.1016/j.addr.2006.09.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03276-310.1016/S1359-6446(04)03276-3 ↗
15. 10.1038/nnano.2007.38710.1038/nnano.2007.387 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn301159a10.1021/nn301159a ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0014710.1021/acsnano.5b00147 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4TB01141D10.1039/C4TB01141D ↗
19. 10.1002/macp.20150039310.1002/macp.201500393 ↗
20. 10.1021/mp300437910.1021/mp3004379 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.01010.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.010 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.07.01910.1016/j.jconrel.2008.07.019 ↗
23. 10.1002/pi.245710.1002/pi.2457 ↗
24. 10.1021/ma901849j10.1021/ma901849j ↗
25. 10.1021/nn204116u10.1021/nn204116u ↗
26. 10.1021/mp300480v10.1021/mp300480v ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.04110.1016/j.msec.2015.11.041 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.00910.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.009 ↗
29. 10.1039/C4TB01141D10.1039/C4TB01141D ↗
30. 10.1002/slct.20170029210.1002/slct.201700292 ↗
31. Weiss C. · 2010 · 18510.1007/12_2010_61 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11095-010-0309-110.1007/s11095-010-0309-1 ↗
33. Landfester, K.; Musyanovych, A. Hydrogels in Miniemulsions Chemical Design of Responsive Microgels. Pich, A.; Richtering, W., Eds. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, 2011; pp 39–63.10.1007/12_2010_68 ↗
34. Griffin W. C. · J. Soc. Cosmetic Chem. · 1949 · 1 · 311
35. 10.1002/chem.20100226810.1002/chem.201002268 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11095-010-0073-210.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 ↗
37. 10.1002/marc.20070021210.1002/marc.200700212 ↗
38. 10.1021/la00006a02010.1021/la00006a020 ↗
39. 10.1021/la980117p10.1021/la980117p ↗
40. 10.1006/jcis.2001.764610.1006/jcis.2001.7646 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.02140110.1103/PhysRevE.66.021401 ↗
42. 10.1186/s40035-015-0041-110.1186/s40035-015-0041-1 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.00710.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.007 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00248-610.1016/S0168-3659(01)00248-6 ↗
45. 10.1038/nbt.228410.1038/nbt.2284 ↗
46. 10.1021/nn405674m10.1021/nn405674m ↗
47. 10.1073/pnas.160630111310.1073/pnas.1606301113 ↗
48. Roux S. · 2005