journal article·2016-06-29

Enhanced Promiscuity of Lipase-Inorganic Nanocrystal Composites in the Epoxidation of Fatty Acids in Organic Media

Xiufu Hua, Yi Xing, Xuan Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

In the present study, Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB) was encapsulated in inorganic nanocrystal composites with flower-like shapes, retaining 92% of its catalytic activity compared to that of native lipase. Surprisingly, CALB-inorganic crystal nanoflowers exhibited promiscuous activity at levels 25- and 4-fold higher than those of native lipase and the commercial immobilized lipase Novozym 435, respectively, as demonstrated by the chemoenzymatic epoxidation of fatty acids conducted in organic media. To the best of our knowledge, we showed for the first time that the promiscuity of enzymes can be significantly improved by enzyme immobilization, suggesting that the enzyme-inorganic nanocrystal composites are a very promising type of immobilized enzyme that can be used to address the challenge of the extremely low efficiency of enzymatic promiscuity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China

Department of Scientific Research and Development, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Department of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.03.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2007.03.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1074-5521(99)80033-710.1016/S1074-5521(99)80033-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1367-5931(03)00032-210.1016/S1367-5931(03)00032-2 ↗
4. 10.1039/c003811c10.1039/c003811c ↗
5. Gupta M. N. · Curr. Sci. · 2011 · 100 · 1152
6. 10.2174/13852721079292759110.2174/138527210792927591 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.molcatb.2013.10.01910.1016/j.molcatb.2013.10.019 ↗
8. 10.1039/c2cs35475f10.1039/c2cs35475f ↗
9. 10.1039/C5CY01181G10.1039/C5CY01181G ↗
10. 10.1038/nnano.2012.8010.1038/nnano.2012.80 ↗
11. 10.1179/14658010422502097410.1179/146580104225020974 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00178-210.1016/S0141-3910(03)00178-2 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.1132210.1002/app.11322 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0926-6690(01)00120-010.1016/S0926-6690(01)00120-0 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.2104410.1002/app.21044 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.189710.1002/app.1897 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0926-6690(98)00023-510.1016/S0926-6690(98)00023-5 ↗
18. 10.1038/srep2241210.1038/srep22412 ↗