Construction of A Fluorescent Nanostructured Chitosan-Hydroxyapatite Scaffold by Nanocrystallon Induced Biomimetic Mineralization and Its Cell Biocompatibility
Source abstract
Abstract
Biomaterial surfaces and their nanostructures can significantly influence cell growth and viability. Thus, manipulating surface characteristics of scaffolds can be a potential strategy to control cell functions for stem cell tissue engineering. In this study, in order to construct a hydroxyapatite (HAp) coated genipin-chitosan conjugation scaffold (HGCCS) with a well-defined HAp nanostructured surface, we have developed a simple and controllable approach that allows construction of a two-level, three-dimensional (3D) networked structure to provide sufficient calcium source and achieve desired mechanical function and mass transport (permeability and diffusion) properties. Using a nontoxic cross-linker (genipin) and a nanocrystallon induced biomimetic mineralization method, we first assembled a layer of HAp network-like nanostructure on a 3D porous chitosan-based framework. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analysis confirm that the continuous network-like nanostructure on the channel surface of the HGCCS is composed of crystalline HAp. Compressive testing demonstrated that the strength of the HGCCS is apparently enhanced because of the strong cross-linking of genipin and the resulting reinforcement of the HAp nanonetwork. The fluorescence properties of genipin-chitosan conjugation for convenient monitoring of the 3D porous scaffold biodegradability and cell localization in the scaffold was specifically explored using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Furthermore, through scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation and immunofluorescence measurements of F-actin, we found that the HAp network-like nanostructure on the surface of the HGCCS can influence the morphology and integrin-mediated cytoskeleton organization of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Based on cell proliferation assays, rat BMSCs tend to have higher viability on HGCCS in vitro. The results of this study suggest that the fluorescent two-level 3D nanostructured chitosan-HAp scaffold will be a promising scaffold for bone tissue engineering application.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center of Bio & Micro/nano Functional Materials, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, 27 Shanda Nanlu, Jinan 250100, P.R.China,
School of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 44, Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan 250012, P.R.China,
Institute of Developmental Biology, College of Life Science, Shandong University, 27 Shanda Nanlu, Jinan 250100, P.R.China, and
Departments of Chemistry and Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3083, United States
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Hall M. J. · Adv. Data · 2002 · 329 · 1
2. Rose F. R. · Biochem. Biophys. Commun. · 2002 · 292 · 110.1006/bbrc.2002.6519 ↗
3. Linkhart T. A. · Bone · 1996 · 19 · 1S10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00138-X ↗
4. Rezwan K. · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 341310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
5. Hollister S. J. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 51810.1038/nmat1421 ↗
6. Johnson P. C. · Tissue Eng. · 2007 · 13 · 282710.1089/ten.2007.0335 ↗
7. Martin C. · Biomaterials · 1996 · 17 · 237310.1016/S0142-9612(96)00075-0 ↗
8. Burg K. J. · Biomaterials · 2000 · 21 · 234710.1016/S0142-9612(00)00102-2 ↗
9. Zhang W. · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 322110.1021/cm030080g ↗
10. Kim I. Y. · Biotechnol. Adv. · 2008 · 26 · 110.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.07.009 ↗
11. Kumar M. N. · Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 104 · 601710.1021/cr030441b ↗
12. Thein-Han W. W. · Acta Biomater. · 2009 · 5 · 118210.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.025 ↗
13. Zhao F. · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 185910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.031 ↗
14. Hu Q. L. · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 77910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00582-9 ↗
15. Manjubala I. · Acta Biomater. · 2006 · 2 · 7510.1016/j.actbio.2005.09.007 ↗
16. Bigi A. · Biomaterials · 2001 · 22 · 76310.1016/S0142-9612(00)00236-2 ↗
17. Ohtsuki C. · J Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. · 2007 · 1 · 3310.1002/term.3 ↗
18. Zhang W. · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 322110.1021/cm030080g ↗
19. Li X. · Nano Lett · 2009 · 9 · 2765
20. Malafaya P. B. · Acta Biomater · 2009 · 5 · 64410.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.017 ↗
21. Kong L. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2006 · 42 · 317110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.08.009 ↗
22. Zhang L. · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2005 · 16 · 21310.1007/s10856-005-6682-3 ↗
23. Araújo A. B. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., A · 2009 · 88 · 91610.1002/jbm.a.31949 ↗
24. Chen S. C. · J. Controlled Release · 2004 · 96 · 28510.1016/j.jconrel.2004.02.002 ↗
25. Chen H. · J, Biomed, Mater, Res A · 2005 · 75 · 91710.1002/jbm.a.30492 ↗
26. Chen H. · Biomacromolecules · 2006 · 7 · 209110.1021/bm050862y ↗
27. Kuo Y. C. · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2006 · 95 · 13210.1002/bit.21007 ↗
28. Kuo Y. C. · Biomaterial · 2009 · 30 · 660410.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.028 ↗
29. Kokubo T. · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 290710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
30. O’Brien F. J. · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 43310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052 ↗
31. Ohgushi H. · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 465410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.055 ↗
32. Rahaman M. N. · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2005 · 91 · 26110.1002/bit.20292 ↗
33. Qi S. · ACS Appl, Mater, Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 3010.1021/am800027d ↗
34. Jiang K. · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 26610.1021/am800219r ↗
35. Bettinger C. J. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 540610.1002/anie.200805179 ↗
36. Stevens M. M. · Science · 2005 · 310 · 113510.1126/science.1106587 ↗
37. Dalby M. J. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 99710.1038/nmat2013 ↗
38. Neira1 I. S. · Mater. Sci. · 2008 · 43 · 217110.1007/s10853-007-2032-9 ↗
39. Olszta M. J. · Mater. Sci. Eng., R · 2007 · 58 · 7710.1016/j.mser.2007.05.001 ↗
40. Nukavarapu S. P. · Biomacromolecules · 2008 · 9 · 181810.1021/bm800031t ↗
41. Lee K. W. · Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 283910.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.030 ↗
42. Takahashi Y. · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 358710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.046 ↗
43. Pittenger M. F. · Science · 1999 · 284 · 14310.1126/science.284.5411.143 ↗
44. Wang N. · J. Cell Biochem. · 2007 · 100 · 154810.1002/jcb.21139 ↗
45. Oliveira J. M. · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 612310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.034 ↗
46. Becher P. F. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1991 · 74 · 25510.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06872.x ↗
47. Brammer K. S. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 78610.1021/nl072572o ↗
48. Guilak F. · Cell Stem Cell · 2009 · 5 · 1710.1016/j.stem.2009.06.016 ↗
49. Chen C. S. · Science · 1997 · 276 · 142510.1126/science.276.5317.1425 ↗
50. McBeath R. · Dev. Cell · 2004 · 6 · 48310.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9 ↗
51. Vogel V. · Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2006 · 7 · 26510.1038/nrm1890 ↗
52. Geiger B. · Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2009 · 10 · 2110.1038/nrm2593 ↗