Ultrafiltration of Uranyl Peroxide Nanoclusters for the Separation of Uranium from Aqueous Solution
Source abstract
Abstract
Uranyl peroxide cluster species were produced in aqueous solution by the treatment of uranyl nitrate with hydrogen peroxide, lithium hydroxide, and potassium chloride. Ultrafiltration of these cluster species using commercial sheet membranes with molecular mass cutoffs of 3, 8, and 20 kDa (based on polyethylene glycol) resulted in U rejection values of 95, 85, and 67% by mass, respectively. Ultrafiltration of untreated uranyl nitrate solutions using these membranes resulted in virtually no rejection of U. These results demonstrate the ability to use the filtration of cluster species as a means for separating U from solutions on the basis of size. Small-angle X-ray scattering, Raman spectroscopy, and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry confirmed the presence of uranyl peroxide cluster species in solution and were used to characterize their size, shape, and dispersity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Extraction and Separation Processes · Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Kubatko K. · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2006 · 893 · 387
2. Sigmon G. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1664810.1021/ja907837u ↗
3. Nyman M. · Inorg. Chem. · 2010 · 49 · 774810.1021/ic1005192 ↗
4. Sigmon G. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 913710.1021/ja2013449 ↗
5. Qiu J. · Chem. Rev. · 2013 · 113 · 109710.1021/cr300159x ↗
6. Burns P. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2005 · 44 · 213510.1002/anie.200462445 ↗
7. Armstrong, C. R.; Nyman, M.; Shvareva, T.; Navrotsky, A.Abstracts of Papers;American Chemical Society:Washington, DC, 2011; Abstract241.
8. Gil A. · Chem.—Eur. J. · 2012 · 18 · 834010.1002/chem.201200801 ↗
9. Nyman M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 2013110.1021/ja308673f ↗
10. Johnson R. L. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2013 · 52 · 746410.1002/anie.201301973 ↗
11. Oliveri A. F. · ChemPhysChem · 2013 · 14 · 265510.1002/cphc.201300188 ↗
12. Forbes T. Z. · Am. Mineral. · 2011 · 96 · 20210.2138/am.2011.3517 ↗
13. Armstrong C. R. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2012 · 109 · 187410.1073/pnas.1119758109 ↗
14. Chung D. · J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. · 2010 · 284 · 12310.1007/s10967-009-0443-6 ↗
15. Soderquist C. Z. · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2011 · 50 · 181310.1021/ie101386n ↗
16. Bohinc K. · PhysChemComm · 2013 · 117 · 10846
17. Zeman, L. J.; Zydney, A. L.InMicrofiltration and ultrafiltration: Principles and applications;Marcel Dekker:New York, 1996; p618.
18. Wallace, C. M.Solution and Aggregation Behavior of the U60 Nanocluster and Post-Detonation Nuclear Forensic Analysis of Trinitite. Ph.D. Dissertation,University of Notre Dame,Notre Dame, IN, 2013.
19. Ferroge A. G. · Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. · 1992 · 6 · 76510.1002/rcm.1290061211 ↗
20. Kedem O. · J. Gen. Physiol. · 1961 · 45 · 14310.1085/jgp.45.1.143 ↗
21. Qiu J. · Inorg. Chem. · 2013 · 52 · 33710.1021/ic3020817 ↗
22. Sigmon G. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 273710.1002/anie.200805870 ↗
23. Clark D. · Chem. Rev. · 1995 · 95 · 2510.1021/cr00033a002 ↗
24. Kim K. · Nucl. Technol. · 2009 · 166 · 17010.13182/NT09-A7403 ↗