journal article·2015-02-25

Platinum-Free Cathode for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) Formed via Oxidative Molecular Layer Deposition

Do Han Kim, Sarah E. Atanasov, Paul Lemaire, Kyoungmi Lee, Gregory N. Parsons

Publisher page

Abstract

Thin ∼ 20 nm conformal poly(3,4-ehylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) films are incorporated in highly conductive mesoporous indium tin oxide (m-ITO) by oxidative molecular layer deposition (oMLD). These three-dimensional catalytic/conductive networks are successfully employed as Pt-free cathodes for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) with open circuit voltage equivalent to Pt cathode devices. Thin and conformal PEDOT films on m-ITO by oMLD create high surface area and efficient electron transport paths to promote productive reduction reaction on the PEDOT film. Because of these two synergetic effects, PEDOT-coated m-ITO by oMLD shows power conversion efficiency, 7.18%, comparable to 7.26% of Pt, and higher than that of planar PEDOT coatings, which is 4.85%. Thus, PEDOT-coated m-ITO is an exceptional opportunity to compete with Pt catalysts for low-cost energy conversion devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, 911 Partners Way, Engineering Building I, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. O’Regan B. · Nature · 1991 · 353 · 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
2. Commodities: Latest Platinum Price & Chart.http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/platinum.aspx(accessed May 30, 2014) .
3. Figgemeier E. · Int. J. Photoenergy · 2004 · 6 · 12710.1155/S1110662X04000169 ↗
4. Elschner A. · 2011
5. Yue G. · Chin. Sci. Bull. · 2013 · 58 · 55910.1007/s11434-012-5352-3 ↗
6. Thompson S. J. · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 02400710.1088/0022-3727/46/2/024007 ↗
7. Shin H.-J. · Synth. Met. · 2011 · 161 · 128410.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.024 ↗
8. Zhang Z. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 624210.1021/am3018338 ↗
9. Xu H. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 108710.1021/am201720p ↗
10. Xiao Y. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 1991910.1039/c2jm34425d ↗
11. Kitamura K. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 19570310.1088/0957-4484/22/19/195703 ↗
12. Sudhagar P. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2011 · 3 · 183810.1021/am2003735 ↗
13. Hong W. · Electrochem. Commun. · 2008 · 10 · 155510.1016/j.elecom.2008.08.007 ↗
14. Trevisan R. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2011 · 1 · 78110.1002/aenm.201100324 ↗
15. Lee T. H. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 2162410.1039/c2jm34807a ↗
16. Chiang C.-H. · Org. Electron. · 2013 · 14 · 176910.1016/j.orgel.2013.03.020 ↗
17. Maiaugree W. · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2012 · 358 · 248910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.12.104 ↗
18. Atanasov S. E. · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 347110.1021/cm500825b ↗
19. George S. M. · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 11110.1021/cr900056b ↗
20. Kim K. H. · Mater. Trans. · 2010 · 51 · 108010.2320/matertrans.M2010034 ↗
21. Papageorgiou N. · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 248 · 142110.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.028 ↗
22. Hauch A. · Electrochim. Acta · 2001 · 46 · 345710.1016/S0013-4686(01)00540-0 ↗
23. Fabregat-Santiago F. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2005 · 87 · 11710.1016/j.solmat.2004.07.017 ↗
24. Roy-Mayhew J. D. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 620310.1021/nn1016428 ↗