journal article·2015-03-25

Amphiphilic Polyelectrolyte/Prodrug Nanoparticles Constructed by Synergetic Electrostatic and Hydrophobic Interactions with Cooperative pH-Sensitivity for Controlled Doxorubicin Delivery

Pingsheng Huang, Weiwei Wang, Junhui Zhou, Fuli Zhao, Yumin Zhang, Jinjian Liu, Jianfeng Liu, Anjie Dong, Deling Kong, Jianhua Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

To achieve higher therapeutic efficiency with catabatic side effects, desirable nanocarriers should be designed to retain the loaded drug tightly during the systemic circulation, but release the drug rapidly and efficiently upon endocytosis by tumor cells. Herein, to achieve "off-on" controlled delivery of DOX, novel amphiphilic polyelectrolyte/prodrug nanoparticles (NPs) with cooperative pH-sensitivity were constructed via synergistic electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between slightly positively charged methoxy polyethylene glycol-b-(poly(2-(diisopropylamino) ethyl methacrylate-co-aminopropyl methacrylamide) (PEDPA) copolymer and negatively charged cis-aconityl-doxorubicin (CAD) prodrug (termed as PEDPA/CAD NPs). With polymer-prodrug synergistic noncovalent interactions, the drug loading content of PEDPA/CAD NPs could be improved up to 12.6% with favorable serum stability, and significantly lowered the drug leakage to 2.5% within 24 h at pH 7.4. However, nearly 80% of encapsulated drug could be released at pH 5.0 within 12 h, due to the cooperative effects of the protonation of PDPA blocks resulting in quick disassembly of NPs and the rapid hydrolysis of cis-aconityl linkage leading to charge-reverse of CAD. Moreover, the results of fluorescent microscopy imaging and flow cytometry measurements exhibited that DOX could be recovered and released rapidly from PEDPA/CAD NPs upon endocytosis and then exert therapeutic action in the cell nucleus. Importantly, the PEDPA/CAD NPs exhibited significantly higher antitumor efficiency in vivo with reduced nonspecific toxicity to normal tissues in comparation with free DOX. In summary, the NPs designed in this work, constructed by synergistic electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions with cooperative pH-sensitivity, which potentially resolved the dilemma between systemic stability and rapid intracellular drug release, would provide a promising nanomedicine platform for cancer therapy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Polymer Science and Technology and Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering of the Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, China

Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Biomedical Engineering. Tianjin 300192, China

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Minotti G. · Pharmacol. Rev. · 2004 · 56 · 18510.1124/pr.56.2.6 ↗
2. Tewey K. M. · Science · 1984 · 226 · 46610.1126/science.6093249 ↗
3. Gewirtz D. A. · Biochem. Pharmacol. · 1999 · 57 · 72710.1016/S0006-2952(98)00307-4 ↗
4. Carvalho C. · Curr. Med. Chem. · 2009 · 16 · 326710.2174/092986709788803312 ↗
5. Nicolas J. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 114710.1039/C2CS35265F ↗
6. Zhuang J. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 742110.1039/c3cs60094g ↗
7. Duncan R. · Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery · 2003 · 2 · 34710.1038/nrd1088 ↗
8. Fang J. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2011 · 63 · 13610.1016/j.addr.2010.04.009 ↗
9. Huang P. · Biomacromolecules · 2014 · 15 · 312810.1021/bm500764p ↗
10. Kwon G. · Pharm. Res. · 1995 · 12 · 19210.1023/A:1016266523505 ↗
11. Gao Z. · J. Controlled Release · 2012 · 162 · 4510.1016/j.jconrel.2012.05.051 ↗
12. Hoffman A. S. · J. Controlled Release · 2008 · 132 · 15310.1016/j.jconrel.2008.08.012 ↗
13. Hu X. · Polym. Chem. · 2013 · 4 · 69510.1039/C2PY20701J ↗
14. Van Nostrum C. F. · Soft Matter · 2011 · 7 · 324610.1039/c0sm00999g ↗
15. Chang L. · J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. · 2013 · 24 · 190010.1080/09205063.2013.808152 ↗
16. Yan J. · Biomacromolecules · 2011 · 12 · 256210.1021/bm200375x ↗
17. Zhu Y. · J. Controlled Release · 2011 · 152 · 31710.1016/j.jconrel.2011.03.013 ↗
18. Tian Y. · J. Controlled Release · 2007 · 121 · 13710.1016/j.jconrel.2007.05.010 ↗
19. Kim S. H. · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 806310.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.018 ↗
20. Chang L. · Biomacromolecules · 2012 · 13 · 330110.1021/bm301086c ↗
21. Meng F. · Mater. Today · 2012 · 15 · 43610.1016/S1369-7021(12)70195-5 ↗
22. Mura S. · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 99110.1038/nmat3776 ↗
23. Delplace V. · Polym. Chem. · 2014 · 5 · 152910.1039/C3PY01384G ↗
24. Li Y. · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 973110.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.022 ↗
25. Huang P. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 1463110.1021/am503974y ↗
26. Huang P. · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 402110.1039/C4TB00273C ↗
27. Sun Y. · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 681810.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.032 ↗
28. Guo S. · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 428310.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.034 ↗
29. Tyrrell Z. L. · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2010 · 35 · 112810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.06.003 ↗
30. Morton S. W. · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 348910.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.027 ↗
31. Wilhelm M. · Macromolecules · 1991 · 24 · 103310.1021/ma00005a010 ↗
32. Yoo H. S. · J. Controlled Release · 2002 · 82 · 1710.1016/S0168-3659(02)00088-3 ↗
33. Yoo H. S. · J. Controlled Release · 2001 · 70 · 6310.1016/S0168-3659(00)00340-0 ↗
34. Choi K. Y. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 859110.1021/nn202070n ↗
35. Dayananda K. · Macromol. Res. · 2007 · 15 · 38510.1007/BF03218803 ↗
36. Hu Y. Q. · Polymer · 2007 · 48 · 343710.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.011 ↗
37. Huh K. · Macromol. Res. · 2012 · 20 · 22410.1007/s13233-012-0059-5 ↗
38. Zhu S. · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 136010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.044 ↗
39. Misra R. · Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. · 2010 · 39 · 15210.1016/j.ejps.2009.11.010 ↗
40. Cho H. J. · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 119010.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.064 ↗
41. Ding J. · Biomater. Sci. · 2013 · 1 · 63310.1039/C3BM60024F ↗
42. Chhikara B. S. · J. Med. Chem. · 2012 · 55 · 150010.1021/jm201653u ↗
43. Nichols J. W. · Nano Today · 2012 · 7 · 60610.1016/j.nantod.2012.10.010 ↗
44. Li Y. · Biomaterials · 2015 · 41 · 110.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.010 ↗
45. Heldin C. H. · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2004 · 4 · 80610.1038/nrc1456 ↗
46. Yang Y. · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 843010.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.037 ↗
47. She W. · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 161310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.007 ↗
48. Shi J. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2011 · 44 · 112310.1021/ar200054n ↗
49. Bae K. H. · Mol. Cells · 2011 · 31 · 29510.1007/s10059-011-0051-5 ↗