Using in-Situ Polymerization of Conductive Polymers to Enhance the Electrical Properties of Solution-Processed Carbon Nanotube Films and Fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Single-walled carbon nanotubes/polymer composites typically have limited conductivity due to a low concentration of nanotubes and the insulating nature of the polymers used. Here we combined a method to align carbon nanotubes with in-situ polymerization of conductive polymer to form composite films and fibers. Use of the conducting polymer raised the conductivity of the films by 2 orders of magnitude. On the other hand, CNT fiber formation was made possible with in-situ polymerization to provide more mechanical support to the CNTs from the formed conducting polymer. The carbon nanotube/conductive polymer composite films and fibers had conductivities of 3300 and 170 S/cm, respectively. The relatively high conductivities were attributed to the polymerization process, which doped both the SWNTs and the polymer. In-situ polymerization can be a promising solution-processable method to enhance the conductivity of carbon nanotube films and fibers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5025, United States
National Laboratory of Microstructures (Nanjing), School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Hammock M. L. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 599710.1002/adma.201302240 ↗
2. Sokolov A. N. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2011 · 45 · 36110.1021/ar2001233 ↗
3. Pan L. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 3002.1
4. Hecht D. S. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 148210.1002/adma.201003188 ↗
5. Lipomi D. J. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 78810.1038/nnano.2011.184 ↗
6. Hecht D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 133112.110.1063/1.2356999 ↗
7. De S. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 71410.1021/nn800858w ↗
8. Weng Y.-T. · Electrochem. Soc. Meeting Abstr. · 2012 · 2 · 585
9. Wang K. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 149410.1002/adma.201204598 ↗
10. Ren J. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 115510.1002/adma.201203445 ↗
11. Bai X. · Electrochim. Acta · 2013 · 87 · 39410.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.079 ↗
12. Baughman R. H. · Science · 2005 · 308 · 6310.1126/science.1099010 ↗
13. Tissaphern M. · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2007 · 16 · S24310.1088/0964-1726/16/2/S07 ↗
14. Zhang M. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 135810.1126/science.1104276 ↗
15. Wang X. · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2013 · 1 · 110.1080/21663831.2013.779091 ↗
16. Koziol K. · Science · 2007 · 318 · 189210.1126/science.1147635 ↗
17. Ma W. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 285510.1021/nl901035v ↗
18. Chae H. G. · Polymer · 2007 · 48 · 378110.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.072 ↗
19. Ko F. · Adv. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 116110.1002/adma.200304955 ↗
20. Jalili R. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 3438.110.1038/srep03438 ↗
21. Davis V. A. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 83010.1038/nnano.2009.302 ↗
22. Chou T.-W. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 70 · 110.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.004 ↗
23. Vigolo B. · Science · 2000 · 290 · 133110.1126/science.290.5495.1331 ↗
24. Allen R. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 724410.1021/am401592v ↗
25. Allen R. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 01570910.1088/0957-4484/24/1/015709 ↗
26. Lee H. W. · Small · 2009 · 5 · 101910.1002/smll.200800640 ↗
27. Topsoe H. · Bridge Technol. · 1968 · 472 · 58
28. Schroder D. K. · 2006
29. Zhou J. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 618910.1021/am4011622 ↗
30. Kumar A. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 1110.1021/nn901903b ↗
31. Chen X. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 1520210.1021/jp9601779 ↗
32. Damlin P. · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2004 · 570 · 11310.1016/j.jelechem.2004.03.023 ↗
33. Guerini S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 233401.110.1103/PhysRevB.72.233401 ↗
34. De Blauwe K. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2009 · 246 · 273210.1002/pssb.200982337 ↗
35. Tat’yana V. V. · Russ. Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 66 · 44310.1070/RC1997v066n05ABEH000261 ↗
36. Wang X.-S. · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2009 · 10 · 525710.3390/ijms10125257 ↗
37. O’Connor B. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 753810.1021/nn1018768 ↗
38. Foroughi J. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 103712.110.1063/1.3425793 ↗
39. Pan L. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2012 · 109 · 928710.1073/pnas.1202636109 ↗
40. Kim Y. H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 107610.1002/adfm.201002290 ↗
41. Chen M. · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2005 · 858 · HH4.11.1
42. Foroughi J. · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 94010.1039/C2NR11580H ↗