journal article·2015-08-19

Contact Antimicrobial Surface Obtained by Chemical Grafting of Microfibrillated Cellulose in Aqueous Solution Limiting Antibiotic Release

Seema Saini, Naceur Belgacem, Joana Mendes, Graziano Elegir, Julien Bras

Publisher page

Abstract

Contact active surfaces are an innovative tool for developing antibacterial products. Here, the microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) surface was modified with the β-lactam antibiotic benzyl penicillin in aqueous medium to prepare antimicrobial films. Penicillin was grafted on the MFC surface using a suspension of these nanofilaments or directly on films. Films prepared from the penicillin-modified MFC were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, elemental analysis, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and tested for antibacterial activity against the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative Escherichia coli. Penicillin-grafted MFC films exhibited successful killing effect on Gram-positive bacteria with 3.5-log reduction whereas bacteriostatic efficiency was found in penicillin-grafted MFC suspension. The zone of inhibition test and leaching dynamic assay demonstrated that penicillin was not diffused into the surrounding media, thus proving that the films were indeed contact active. Thus, penicillin can be chemically bound to the modified substrate surface to produce promising nonleaching antimicrobial systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Antimicrobial agents and applications · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, LGP2, F-38000 Grenoble, France

CNRS, LGP2, F-38000 Grenoble, France

INNOVHUB SSI, Paper Division, Via Giuseppe Colombo 83, 20133, Milano, Italy

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/12_09710.1007/12_097 ↗
2. Herrick F. W. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci.: Appl. Polym. Symp. · 1983 · 37 · 797
3. Turbak A. F. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci.: Appl. Polym. Symp. · 1983 · 37 · 815
4. 10.1021/cr900339w10.1021/cr900339w ↗
5. 10.1163/156855405354218810.1163/1568554053542188 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10570-012-9780-710.1007/s10570-012-9780-7 ↗
7. 10.1039/C3CS60204D10.1039/C3CS60204D ↗
8. 10.1299/jsmea.48.19910.1299/jsmea.48.199 ↗
9. 10.3390/polym204072810.3390/polym2040728 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.047 ↗
11. 10.1080/0193269070134182710.1080/01932690701341827 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.06710.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.067 ↗
13. 10.1021/am400338n10.1021/am400338n ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.06.01110.1016/j.ejpb.2012.06.011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.04.04610.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.04.046 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10570-014-0392-210.1007/s10570-014-0392-2 ↗
17. 10.1021/bm070304e10.1021/bm070304e ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.03710.1016/j.msec.2014.09.037 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.03510.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.035 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00253005154610.1007/s002530051546 ↗
21. Blumberg P. M. · Bacteriol. Rev. · 1974 · 38 · 29110.1128/br.38.3.291-335.1974 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.01110.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.011 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00216-009-2969-410.1007/s00216-009-2969-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.07.07410.1016/j.jcis.2005.07.074 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.2345410.1002/app.23454 ↗
26. 10.1021/bm901186u10.1021/bm901186u ↗
27. 10.1039/C4TA04954C10.1039/C4TA04954C ↗
28. 10.1007/s10570-010-9474-y10.1007/s10570-010-9474-y ↗
29. 10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z ↗
30. 10.1021/la403251410.1021/la4032514 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10570-013-0110-510.1007/s10570-013-0110-5 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10570-013-0025-110.1007/s10570-013-0025-1 ↗
33. 10.1016/0368-2048(76)80015-110.1016/0368-2048(76)80015-1 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00051-410.1016/S0032-3861(02)00051-4 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10570-013-9887-510.1007/s10570-013-9887-5 ↗
36. 10.1021/ac00186a01710.1021/ac00186a017 ↗
37. 10.1021/bm061050k10.1021/bm061050k ↗
38. 10.1007/s10570-012-9742-010.1007/s10570-012-9742-0 ↗