High Photoresponse in Hybrid Graphene–Carbon Nanotube Infrared Detectors
Source abstract
Abstract
Efficient exciton dissociation is crucial to obtaining high photonic response in photodetectors. This work explores implementation of a novel exciton dissociation mechanism through heterojunctions self-assembled at the graphene/MWCNT (multiwall carbon nanotube) interfaces in graphene/MWCNT nanohybrids. Significantly enhanced near-infrared photoresponsivity by nearly an order of magnitude has been achieved on the graphene/MWCNT nanohybrids as compared to the best achieved so far on carbon nanotube (CNT) only infrared (IR) detectors. This leads to a high detectivity up to 1.5 × 10(7) cm·Hz(1/2)·W(-1) in the graphene/MWCNT nanohybrid, which represents a 500% improvement over the best D* achieved on MWCNT film IR detectors and may be further improved with optimization on the interfacial heterojunctions. This approach of the self-assembly of graphene/CNT nanohybrids provides a pathway toward high-performance and low-cost carbon nanostructure IR detectors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Itkis M. E. · Nano Lett. · 2002 · 2 · 15510.1021/nl0156639 ↗
2. Freitag M. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 106710.1021/nl034313e ↗
3. Lai, K. W. C.; Xi, N.; Fung, C. K. M.; Chen, H.Optical response time for carbon nanotube based infrared detectors.9th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, Genoa, 2009.
4. Itkis M. E. · Science · 2006 · 312 · 41310.1126/science.1125695 ↗
5. Lu R. T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 16311010.1063/1.3124651 ↗
6. Xiao L. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 02550210.1088/0957-4484/22/2/025502 ↗
7. Rao F. B. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 05550110.1088/0957-4484/20/5/055501 ↗
8. Levitsky I. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 185710.1063/1.1606099 ↗
9. Fujiwara A. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 · 2001 · 40 · L122910.1143/JJAP.40.L1229 ↗
10. Lu R. T. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 08430510.1063/1.3492633 ↗
11. Chen H. Z. · IEEE Sens. J. · 2013 · 13 · 94910.1109/JSEN.2012.2225424 ↗
12. Yang L. J. · Nat. Photonics · 2011 · 5 · 67210.1038/nphoton.2011.250 ↗
13. Ong P. L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 03310610.1063/1.3279141 ↗
14. Chen H. Z. · IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 9 · 58210.1109/TNANO.2010.2053216 ↗
15. Lu R. T. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 624410.1021/nl303302p ↗
16. Zeng Q. S. · Opt. Mater. Express · 2012 · 2 · 83910.1364/OME.2.000839 ↗
17. Wang F. · Science · 2005 · 308 · 83810.1126/science.1110265 ↗
18. Su W. S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 23541310.1103/PhysRevB.76.235413 ↗
19. Paulson S. · Science · 2000 · 290 · 174210.1126/science.290.5497.1742 ↗
20. Lu R. T. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 26550310.1088/0957-4484/22/26/265503 ↗
21. Lu R. T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 21310110.1063/1.3035848 ↗
22. http://www.xgsciences.com/.
23. Shiraishi M. · Carbon · 2001 · 39 · 191310.1016/S0008-6223(00)00322-5 ↗
24. Ren S. Q. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 531610.1021/nl202796u ↗
25. Collins P. G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 89410.1063/1.125621 ↗