journal article·2013-11-27

High Photoresponse in Hybrid Graphene–Carbon Nanotube Infrared Detectors

Rongtao Lu, Caleb Christianson, Ben Weintrub, Judy Z. Wu

Publisher page

Abstract

Efficient exciton dissociation is crucial to obtaining high photonic response in photodetectors. This work explores implementation of a novel exciton dissociation mechanism through heterojunctions self-assembled at the graphene/MWCNT (multiwall carbon nanotube) interfaces in graphene/MWCNT nanohybrids. Significantly enhanced near-infrared photoresponsivity by nearly an order of magnitude has been achieved on the graphene/MWCNT nanohybrids as compared to the best achieved so far on carbon nanotube (CNT) only infrared (IR) detectors. This leads to a high detectivity up to 1.5 × 10(7) cm·Hz(1/2)·W(-1) in the graphene/MWCNT nanohybrid, which represents a 500% improvement over the best D* achieved on MWCNT film IR detectors and may be further improved with optimization on the interfacial heterojunctions. This approach of the self-assembly of graphene/CNT nanohybrids provides a pathway toward high-performance and low-cost carbon nanostructure IR detectors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Itkis M. E. · Nano Lett. · 2002 · 2 · 15510.1021/nl0156639 ↗
2. Freitag M. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 106710.1021/nl034313e ↗
3. Lai, K. W. C.; Xi, N.; Fung, C. K. M.; Chen, H.Optical response time for carbon nanotube based infrared detectors.9th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, Genoa, 2009.
4. Itkis M. E. · Science · 2006 · 312 · 41310.1126/science.1125695 ↗
5. Lu R. T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 16311010.1063/1.3124651 ↗
6. Xiao L. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 02550210.1088/0957-4484/22/2/025502 ↗
7. Rao F. B. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 05550110.1088/0957-4484/20/5/055501 ↗
8. Levitsky I. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 185710.1063/1.1606099 ↗
9. Fujiwara A. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 · 2001 · 40 · L122910.1143/JJAP.40.L1229 ↗
10. Lu R. T. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 08430510.1063/1.3492633 ↗
11. Chen H. Z. · IEEE Sens. J. · 2013 · 13 · 94910.1109/JSEN.2012.2225424 ↗
12. Yang L. J. · Nat. Photonics · 2011 · 5 · 67210.1038/nphoton.2011.250 ↗
13. Ong P. L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 03310610.1063/1.3279141 ↗
14. Chen H. Z. · IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 9 · 58210.1109/TNANO.2010.2053216 ↗
15. Lu R. T. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 624410.1021/nl303302p ↗
16. Zeng Q. S. · Opt. Mater. Express · 2012 · 2 · 83910.1364/OME.2.000839 ↗
17. Wang F. · Science · 2005 · 308 · 83810.1126/science.1110265 ↗
18. Su W. S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 23541310.1103/PhysRevB.76.235413 ↗
19. Paulson S. · Science · 2000 · 290 · 174210.1126/science.290.5497.1742 ↗
20. Lu R. T. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 26550310.1088/0957-4484/22/26/265503 ↗
21. Lu R. T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 21310110.1063/1.3035848 ↗
22. http://www.xgsciences.com/.
23. Shiraishi M. · Carbon · 2001 · 39 · 191310.1016/S0008-6223(00)00322-5 ↗
24. Ren S. Q. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 531610.1021/nl202796u ↗
25. Collins P. G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 89410.1063/1.125621 ↗