Microscale Sensing of Oxygen via Encapsulated Porphyrin Nanofibers: Effect of Indicator and Polymer “Core” Permeability
Source abstract
Abstract
Biomimetic polymer nanofibers integrate sensing capabilities creating utility across many biological and biomedical applications. We created fibers consisting of either a poly(ether sulfone) (PES) or a polysulfone (PSU) core coated by a biocompatible polycaprolactone (PCL) shell to facilitate cell attachment. Oxygen sensitive luminescent probes Pt(II) meso-tetra(pentafluorophenyl)porphine (PtTFPP) or Pd(II) meso-tetra(pentafluorophenyl)porphine (PdTFPP), were incorporated in the core via single-step coaxial electrospinning providing superior sensitivity, high brightness, linear response, and excellent stability. Both PES-PCL and PSU-PCL fibers provide more uniform probe distribution than polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). PSU-based sensing fibers possessed optimum sensitivity due to their relatively higher oxygen permeability. During exposure to 100% nitrogen and 100% oxygen, PES-PCL fiber displayed an I0/I100 value of 6.7; PSU-PCL exhibited a value of 8.9 with PtTFPP as the indicator. In contrast, PdTFPP-containing fibers possess higher sensitivity due to the long porphyrin lifetime. The corresponding I0/I100 values were 80.6 and 106.7 for the PES-PCL and PSU-PCL matrices, respectively. The response and recovery times were 0.24/0.39 s for PES-PCL and 0.38/0.83 s for PSU-PCL which are 0.12 and 0.11 s faster, respectively, than the Pt-based porphyrin in the same matrices. Paradoxically, lower oxygen permeabilities make these polymers better suited to measuring higher (i. e., ∼20%) oxygen contents than PDMS. Individual fiber sensing was studied by fluorescence spectrometry and at a sub-micrometer scale by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF). Specific polymer blends relate polymer composition to the resulting sensor properties. All compositions displayed linear Stern-Volmer plots; sensitivity could be tailored by matrix or the sensing probe selection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
Funding
Division of Engineering Education and Centers · Institute for Materials Research, Ohio State University · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Semenza G. L. · Science · 2007 · 318 · 6210.1126/science.1147949 ↗
2. Napp J. · Anal. Chem. · 2011 · 83 · 903910.1021/ac201870b ↗
3. Ji J. · J. Biomed. Opt. · 2002 · 7 · 40410.1117/1.1483082 ↗
4. Lecoq J. · Nat. Med. · 2011 · 17 · 89310.1038/nm.2394 ↗
5. Suresh S. · J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. · 2009 · 84 · 109110.1002/jctb.2154 ↗
6. Wang X.-d. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2014 · 43 · 366610.1039/C4CS00039K ↗
7. Wang X.-d. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1701110.1021/ja308830e ↗
8. Habibagahi A. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 178510.1021/am900306a ↗
9. Fercher A. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 549910.1021/nn200807g ↗
10. Thomas P. C. · Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 81 · 923910.1021/ac9013379 ↗
11. Baleizao C. · Anal. Chem. · 2008 · 80 · 644910.1021/ac801034p ↗
12. Tian Y. Q. · Sens. Actuators, B · 2010 · 150 · 57910.1016/j.snb.2010.08.036 ↗
13. Xue R. · Sens. Actuators, B · 2014 · 192 · 69710.1016/j.snb.2013.10.084 ↗
14. Wang L.-Y. · J. Lumin. · 2011 · 131 · 127710.1016/j.jlumin.2011.03.017 ↗
15. Quaranta M. · Bioanal. Rev. · 2012 · 4 · 11510.1007/s12566-012-0032-y ↗
16. Tian Y. Q. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 206910.1021/cm903361y ↗
17. Spellane P. J. · Inorg. Chem. · 1980 · 19 · 38610.1021/ic50204a021 ↗
18. Lai S.-W. · Inorg. Chem. · 2004 · 43 · 372410.1021/ic049902h ↗
19. Kneas K. A. · Microsc. Microanal. · 2000 · 6 · 55110.1007/S100050010052 ↗
20. Evans R. C. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 102310.1021/am900007m ↗
21. McKeen L. W. · 2012
22. Arai T. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 545310.1021/am3013664 ↗
23. Nam J. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2008 · 107 · 154710.1002/app.27063 ↗
24. Hartmann P. · Anal. Chem. · 1995 · 67 · 8810.1021/ac00097a015 ↗
25. Reneker D. H. · 2007 · 41 · 43
26. Xue R. · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2013 · 33 · 345010.1016/j.msec.2013.04.030 ↗
27. Lakowicz J. R. · 200610.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 ↗
28. Demas J. N. · Anal. Chem. · 1995 · 67 · 137710.1021/ac00104a012 ↗
29. Grist S. M. · Sensors · 2010 · 10 · 928610.3390/s101009286 ↗
30. Eastwood D. · J. Mol. Spectrosc. · 1970 · 35 · 35910.1016/0022-2852(70)90179-7 ↗
31. Borisov S. M. · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2011 · 690 · 10810.1016/j.aca.2011.01.057 ↗
32. Kellner K. · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2002 · 80 · 7310.1002/bit.10352 ↗
33. Klimant I. · Anal. Chem. · 1995 · 67 · 316010.1021/ac00114a010 ↗
34. Sinkala E. · Lab Chip · 2010 · 10 · 329110.1039/c0lc00244e ↗
35. Wang X. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 1606610.1039/c2jm32122j ↗
36. Abdel-Shafi A. A. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 1999 · 104 · 19210.1021/jp991876z ↗
37. Moreno M. J. · Sens. Actuators, B · 2003 · 90 · 8210.1016/S0925-4005(03)00057-1 ↗
38. Rao S. S. · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 518110.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.069 ↗