journal article·2017-09-20Open access

Electrostatic Polysulfides Confinement to Inhibit Redox Shuttle Process in the Lithium Sulfur Batteries

Min Ling, Wenjun Yan, Ayako Kawase, Hui Zhao, Yanbao Fu, Vincent S. Battaglia, Gao Liu

Abstract

Cationic polymer can capture polysulfide ions and inhibit polysulfide shuttle effect in lithium sulfur (Li–S) rechargeable batteries, enhancing the Li–S battery cycling performance. The cationic poly[bis(2-chloroethyl) ether- alt -1,3-bis[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]urea] quaternized (PQ) with a high density quaternary ammonium cations can trap the lithium polysulfide through the electrostatic attraction between positively charged quaternary ammonium (R 4 N + ) and negatively charged polysulfide (S x 2– ). PQ binder based sulfur electrodes deliver much higher capacity and provide better stability than traditional polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binder based electrodes in Li–S cells. A high sulfur loading of 7.5 mg/cm 2 is achieved, which delivers a high initial areal capacity of 9.0 mAh/cm 2 and stable cycling capacity at around 7.0 mAh/cm 2 in the following cycles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Applied Energy Materials Group, Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Funding

Vehicle Technologies Program

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c2cs35256g10.1039/c2cs35256g ↗
2. 10.1021/cr500062v10.1021/cr500062v ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms398510.1038/ncomms3985 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.180639410.1149/1.1806394 ↗
5. 10.1021/am504763p10.1021/am504763p ↗
6. 10.1021/am403578410.1021/am4035784 ↗
7. 10.1021/am400958x10.1021/am400958x ↗
8. 10.1021/am400053510.1021/am4000535 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.04210.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.042 ↗
10. 10.1088/2053-1583/2/1/01401110.1088/2053-1583/2/1/014011 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20160175910.1002/adma.201601759 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5MH00246J10.1039/C5MH00246J ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0416610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04166 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.5b1132710.1021/acsami.5b11327 ↗
15. 10.1039/c3sc51476e10.1039/c3sc51476e ↗
16. 10.1002/aenm.20150087810.1002/aenm.201500878 ↗
17. 10.1039/C6EE03033E10.1039/C6EE03033E ↗
18. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.007 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b0111810.1021/acsami.6b01118 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.01210.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.012 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.09010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.090 ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.5b0811310.1021/jacs.5b08113 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.03610.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.036 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20160516010.1002/adma.201605160 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1253810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12538 ↗
26. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.1110.1038/nenergy.2017.11 ↗
27. 10.1039/C4CP00958D10.1039/C4CP00958D ↗
28. 10.1038/ncomms619310.1038/ncomms6193 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.5b1201210.1021/acsami.5b12012 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20110327410.1002/adma.201103274 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0007310.1021/acsenergylett.6b00073 ↗