journal article·2016-12-07

A54 Peptide Modified and Redox-Responsive Glucolipid Conjugate Micelles for Intracellular Delivery of Doxorubicin in Hepatocarcinoma Therapy

Na Liu, Yanan Tan, Yingwen Hu, Tingting Meng, Lijuan Wen, Jingwen Liu, Bolin Cheng, Hong Yuan, Xuan Huang, Fuqiang Hu

Publisher page

Abstract

Redox-responsive nanomaterials applied in drug delivery systems (DDS) have attracted an increasing attention in pharmaceutical research as a carrier for antitumor therapy. However, there would be unwanted drug release from a redox-responsive DDS with no selection at nontarget sites, leading to undesirable toxicities in normal tissues and cells. Here, an A54 peptide modified and PEGylated reduction cleavable glucolipid conjugate (A54-PEG-CSO-ss-SA, abbreviated to APC ss A) was designed for intracellular delivery of doxorubicin (DOX). The synthesized APC ss A could be assembled via micellization self-assembly in aqueous water above the critical micelle concentration (54.9 μg/mL) and exhibited a high drug encapsulation efficiency (77.92%). The APC ss A micelles showed an enhanced redox sensitivity in that the disulfide bond could be degraded quickly and the drug would be released from micelles in 10 mM levels of glutathione (GSH). The cellular uptake studies highlighted the affinity of APC ss A micelles toward the hepatoma cells (BEL-7402) compared to that toward HepG2 cells. In contrast with the nonresponsive conjugate, the drug was released from APC ss A micelles more quickly in 10 mM level of GSH concentration (tumor cells). Moreover, the DOX-loaded APC ss A micelles displayed an increased cytotoxicity which was 1.6- to 2.0-fold that of unmodified and nonresponsive micelles. In vivo, the APC ss A micelles had stronger distribution to liver and hepatoma tissue and prolonged the circulation and retention time, while the drug release only occurred in the tumor tissue. The APC ss A/DOX showed the tumor inhibition rate equal to that of commercial doxorubicin hydrochloric without negative consequence. This study suggested that the APC ss A/DOX showed promising potential to treat the tumor for its special tumor targeting, selective intracellular drug release, enhanced antitumor activity, and reduced toxicity on normal tissues.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, PR China

Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine Science, Jiaxing University, Zhejiang 314001, PR China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.09.00810.1016/j.jhep.2015.09.008 ↗
2. 10.1002/ijc.2921010.1002/ijc.29210 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90735-310.1016/S0140-6736(78)90735-3 ↗
4. 10.1002/1097-0142(19851215)56:12<2751::AID-CNCR2820561205>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/1097-0142(19851215)56:12<2751::AID-CNCR2820561205>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
5. 10.2165/00003088-198815010-0000210.2165/00003088-198815010-00002 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.609324910.1126/science.6093249 ↗
7. 10.1177/10600280940280091210.1177/106002809402800912 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.pcad.2006.10.00210.1016/j.pcad.2006.10.002 ↗
9. 10.1002/1097-0142(197308)32:2<302::AID-CNCR2820320205>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/1097-0142(197308)32:2<302::AID-CNCR2820320205>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2010.08.00610.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2010.08.006 ↗
11. 10.1021/am300522510.1021/am3005225 ↗
12. 10.1021/am509146210.1021/am5091462 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.008 ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.00301510.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.003015 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00275-010.1016/S0891-5849(99)00275-0 ↗
16. Wu G. · J. Nutr. · 2004 · 134 · 48910.1093/jn/134.3.489 ↗
17. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.25.050304.09263310.1146/annurev.nutr.25.050304.092633 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02268.x10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02268.x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.01810.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.018 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.06.01510.1016/j.ejpb.2008.06.015 ↗
21. 10.1021/mp300002v10.1021/mp300002v ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.05.01210.1016/j.jconrel.2004.05.012 ↗
23. Endo N. · Cancer Res. · 1987 · 47 · 1076
24. 10.1021/acsami.5b0561810.1021/acsami.5b05618 ↗
25. 10.2147/IJN.S7984010.2147/IJN.S79840 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-6446(02)02522-910.1016/S1359-6446(02)02522-9 ↗
27. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-255010.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2550 ↗
28. 10.1073/pnas.86.20.792810.1073/pnas.86.20.7928 ↗
29. Arora N. · Cancer Res. · 1999 · 59 · 183
30. 10.1006/viro.1999.993010.1006/viro.1999.9930 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.031 ↗
32. Heiskanen T. · J. Virol · 1997 · 71 · 387910.1128/jvi.71.5.3879-3885.1997 ↗
33. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-033910.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0339 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.043 ↗
35. Szatrowski T. P. · Cancer Res. · 1991 · 51 · 794
36. 10.1016/S0009-9120(00)00181-810.1016/S0009-9120(00)00181-8 ↗
37. 10.1089/ars.2013.575410.1089/ars.2013.5754 ↗
38. 10.1083/jcb.100.3.96510.1083/jcb.100.3.965 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.03.01410.1016/j.jconrel.2011.03.014 ↗