Wetting Hierarchy in Oleophobic 3D Electrospun Nanofiber Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Wetting behavior between electrospun nanofibrous networks and liquids is of critical importance in many applications including filtration and liquid-repellent textiles. The relationship between intrinsic nanofiber properties, including surface characteristics, and extrinsic nanofibrous network organization on resultant wetting characteristics of the nanofiber network is shown in this work. Novel 3D imaging exploiting focused ion beam (FIB) microscopy and cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) highlights a wetting hierarchy that defines liquid interactions with the network. Specifically, small length scale partial wetting between individual electrospun nanofibers and low surface tension liquids, measured both using direct SEM visualization and a nano Wilhelmy balance approach, provides oleophobic surfaces due to the high porosity of electrospun nanofiber networks. These observations conform to a metastable Cassie-Baxter regime and are important in defining general rules for understanding the wetting behavior between fibrous solids and low surface tension liquids for omniphobic functionality.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
International Centre of Electron Microscopy for Materials Science and Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Defence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom
School of Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, United Kingdom
Funding
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1044710.1038/nature10447 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.nantod.2011.02.00210.1016/j.nantod.2011.02.002 ↗
3. 10.1002/polb.2307010.1002/polb.23070 ↗
4. 10.1039/b809074m10.1039/b809074m ↗
5. Hakimi O. · Eur. Cells Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 34410.22203/eCM.v024a25 ↗
6. 10.1080/09205063.2014.91015110.1080/09205063.2014.910151 ↗
7. 10.5301/ijao.500013010.5301/ijao.5000130 ↗
8. 10.1021/la900660v10.1021/la900660v ↗
9. 10.1007/s10570-012-9751-z10.1007/s10570-012-9751-z ↗
10. 10.1039/tf944400054610.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
11. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.6910.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.69 ↗
12. 10.1021/ma051118910.1021/ma0511189 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.114832610.1126/science.1148326 ↗
14. 10.1038/nature1077910.1038/nature10779 ↗
15. 10.1021/la701116710.1021/la7011167 ↗
16. 10.1021/la062634a10.1021/la062634a ↗
17. 10.1021/la701324m10.1021/la701324m ↗
18. 10.1002/app.2890410.1002/app.28904 ↗
19. 10.1021/la104978e10.1021/la104978e ↗
20. 10.1021/am900481d10.1021/am900481d ↗
21. 10.1021/am300235r10.1021/am300235r ↗
22. 10.1021/am200244410.1021/am2002444 ↗
23. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/36/36570810.1088/0957-4484/22/36/365708 ↗
24. 10.1021/la500433710.1021/la5004337 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.04.05310.1016/j.apsusc.2008.04.053 ↗
26. Grill A. · 199410.1109/9780470544273 ↗
27. 10.1021/la802820u10.1021/la802820u ↗
28. 10.1021/la104664510.1021/la1046645 ↗
29. 10.1039/c2jm33807f10.1039/c2jm33807f ↗
30. 10.1063/1.115002110.1063/1.1150021 ↗
31. 10.1163/156856199X0058710.1163/156856199X00587 ↗
32. 10.1038/nprot.2011.33210.1038/nprot.2011.332 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.micron.2013.04.00510.1016/j.micron.2013.04.005 ↗
34. 10.1006/jcis.1996.466510.1006/jcis.1996.4665 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms248210.1038/ncomms2482 ↗
36. 10.1021/nn304250e10.1021/nn304250e ↗
37. 10.1007/s10853-011-5314-110.1007/s10853-011-5314-1 ↗
38. 10.1021/la902098a10.1021/la902098a ↗
39. Stachewicz U. · 2012 · 47
40. 10.1021/la203396y10.1021/la203396y ↗
41. 10.1021/ma050394k10.1021/ma050394k ↗
42. 10.1021/ma901973t10.1021/ma901973t ↗